Infini wrote: » Hopefully he doesn't get elected, he seems to be an idiot that got a bit popular because he called out something as it is nothing more. Isn't worth electing headbangers to these thing's they end up screwing people over because they're too stupid and incompetent to do the job in the end.
Peter Casey, the former presidential election candidate, has called for “freeloaders” in Ireland’s direct provision system to be “put back on the plane” and urged the government not to “dilute” Brand Ireland by “inviting . . . people who just want to take advantage of our generosity, and our good nature”.
Jamie2k9 wrote: » https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/casey-turns-his-guns-on-freeloader-immigrants-2b8wpvlgp Finally somebody admits it, people sponging of the taxpayer for 7 years or more in DP.
Jamie2k9 wrote: » https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/casey-turns-his-guns-on-freeloader-immigrants-2b8wpvlgp Finially somebody admits it, people sponging of the taxpayer for 7 years or more in DP.
franciebrady wrote: Still betting on him coming out with some controversial remark about immigration and the great unleashed taking to the Tweet machine again.
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » I'm not sure what his policies are but he has the right opinion about travellers and Johnny foreigner. Hell get my vote.
gandalf wrote: » So you don't know what he stands for but you're committing your vote to him. What an asset to society you are :rolleyes:
gandalf wrote: So you don't know what he stands for but you're committing your vote to him. What an asset to society you are
eagle eye wrote: » You obviously don't understand rural Ireland, there are loads if people who will vote like this. If you stand on a platform of being against travellers getting everything, foreign Dole spongers, social housing and then you are for bog cutting and more hospital beds you are doing it right to get elected.
Danzy wrote: » The vast majority of votes ever cast are in that manner.
Danzy wrote: » The vast majority of votes ever cast are in that manner. He'll get an awful lot of votes as well because those most against him tend to be the types from the modern Priest class. Many will look at it being a positive to be disliked by them.
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » I suppose you're intimately familiar with every candidate you've ever voted for then. I identify with Peter Casey. He's not afraid to tell the truth. That's all I need to know about him. The polical classes are terrified of him because he calls it as it is.
dxhound2005 wrote: You may also need to know that he tried to join Fianna Fail.
dxhound2005 wrote: » Not my vote, and I don't know how you could come up with this.
dxhound2005 wrote: » You may also need to know that he tried to join Fianna Fail.
alchemist33 wrote: » Since he's in my constituency, I'll start paying attention now. That's not a policy, it's a rant. How about he looks at the mechanism whereby it takes years to decide on refugee status and show us his ideas on that? Or would that just be admitting it's a little more complicated than "inviting freeloaders"?
Faugheen wrote: » People who talk about Casey ‘telling the truth’... What’s he going to do about it? It’s all well and good having someone who represents your views but with no actual policy to tackle it what’s the point? He’s an absolute chancer. He was throwing **** at a wall and hoping something would stick.
alchemist33 wrote: Since he's in my constituency, I'll start paying attention now. That's not a policy, it's a rant. How about he looks at the mechanism whereby it takes years to decide on refugee status and show us his ideas on that? Or would that just be admitting it's a little more complicated than "inviting freeloaders"?
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » Hell do more than the current crop of useless ****ers in Brussels. Hopefully he uses his platform to solve rural burglaries and ends direct provision. There are 4 people of voting age in my house. All voting casey no. 1
is_that_so wrote: Strasbourg not Brussels. And they don't solve any of this. I'd abstain and save those 4 votes for the GE because we know he'll be back again for that.
Faugheen wrote: » What will he do? What are his policies to tackle travellers and Johnny Foreigners? I can tell you with 100% guarantee that he will do f*ck all, but he’ll keep himself popular by ‘telling the truth’. How can he tackle rural burglaries and direct provision in Europe? You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. Those laws are made here. You’re voting for him because underneath it all, you don’t like foreigners or travellers. You know deep down he’ll do nothing about it but you’ll vote for him anyway.
eagle eye wrote: » Which politician have you voted for who has provided in-depth knowledge on things?
