nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

lbc2019

Some of her posts on twitter lately seem to be off the charts.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

SafeSurfer

ogsjw wrote: »

Can you elaborate on why you feel the contents of my posts appeared 'troll-like'?

Offering amateur medical diagnosis of mental illness, early onset dementia and stating you are not even joking.

batgoat

its_steve116 wrote: »

She's the member of Choice Music Prize-nominated duo Saint Sister that isn't Morgan MacIntyre.

They're the best girl band in the world, better than Little Mix and Fifth Harmony combined.

Now reminded of how good the Twin Peaks season 3 soundtrack is.

Patty Hearst

batgoat wrote: »

Now reminded of how good the Twin Peaks season 3 soundtrack is.

Well at least there's something I can agree with you on..

ogsjw

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Offering amateur medical diagnosis of mental illness, early onset dementia and stating you are not even joking.

Sorry my post triggered you, but a lot of people can spot dementia onset. Suggesting that she may be mentally unwell from the contents of that tweet are perfectly reasonable in my opinion, sorry your feelings were harmed in the process.

PS: Don't read the thread title, that will really upset you.

Birneybau

Charles Ingles wrote: »

Ill leave you all to your debate folks, I'm out.
Charles

Me hole you are

[Deleted User]

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Absence of war in Wicklow perhaps.

Still doesn't explain the 5%

klaaaz

The latest, comparing the young Swedish girl campaigning on climate change to a Nazi propagandist like Goebbels. The girl who some of us may agree or disagree with is certainly no nazi propagandist, it's another new low for Gemma. Attention seeker that wan Gemma is.

BBFAN

Jesus H Christ, it gets worse every minute.

Timberrrrrrrr

She really is a low life!

WinnyThePoo

batgoat wrote: »

its_steve116 wrote: »

She's the member of Choice Music Prize-nominated duo Saint Sister that isn't Morgan MacIntyre.

They're the best girl band in the world, better than Little Mix and Fifth Harmony combined.

Now reminded of how good the Twin Peaks season 3 soundtrack is.

Now season three of twin peaks. That was some screwed up and hilarious stuff.

Maybe what happened to Dale Cooper is what happened to Gemma. Maybe it's not the original Gemma lulz.

ogsjw

SHE HAS PIGTAILS!! NAZI! NAZI!!!!!!!!

pjohnson

klaaaz wrote: »

The latest, comparing the young Swedish girl campaigning on climate change to a Nazi propagandist like Goebbels. The girl who some of us may agree or disagree with is certainly no nazi propagandist, it's another new low for Gemma. Attention seeker that wan Gemma is.

Charles and Patty strangely quiet now again. No more than after calling NZ a false flag. Think they'd be uniting to protect Gemgem.

Annasopra

jeremyj1968 wrote: »

The question of migration does need to be addressed without everybody being afraid of offending someone. It's naive to think that there are not going to be conflicts between the ideologies of the religions were are importing and our own values in the future. Even if you just take the example of what happened in Birmingham the other week.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-1863694/Video-Muslim-parents-protest-lessons-homosexuality-Birmingham-school.html

Pro-migration people would have you believe that everything will be fine, that Muslim and Christians will link arms and start singing hymns together. But once Muslims get a serious foothold in certain communities they are going to start wanting things done their way. Most people who are pro-immigration are also pro-equality, pro-gay marriage rights, pro-LGBT rights, but these are not consistent. If this was a pre-dominantly Christian school against LGBT teachings, this would be heading all the news stories, but it barely got a mention here. Nobody wants to question Muslim beliefs. Everybody ignores it.

I think Gemma goes too hard by saying "Is that what you want - Sharia Law? Is that what you want for your country?" - I think it's not helpful to portray it in armageddon like terms. It's more subtle than that. But questions do need to be asked about exactly, how compatible the beliefs and values of immigrants are with the beliefs and values of the native Irish?

I always find it amazing that some people who never had an interest in womens rights or lgbt rights suddenly find interest in order to express their divisive rhetoric against islam

Annasopra

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Just an observation on this thread. Everyone that holds opinions contrary to the accepted narrative, be they Gemma O Doherty or John Waters is labeled as mad, mentally ill, bonkers, doolally. Trans people were similarly labeled in the not too distant past. Will we ever get to the stage where we can tolerate diversity of opinion even if the opinion is unpopular?

I dont see why hate mongering against Migrants, Refugees, LGBT people, Muslims should be tolerated no.
Christchurch, Utoya and Batley and Spen are the result of all this hate mongering.

SafeSurfer

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

I dont see why hate mongering against Migrants, Refugees, LGBT people, Muslims should be tolerated no.
Christchurch, Utoya and Batley and Spen are the result of all this hate mongering.

So it’s ok to hate people who hold obnoxious opinions and you get to decide whether opinions are obnoxious or not and in turn who it is acceptable to hate?

Annasopra

Charles Ingles wrote: »

I agree with you she should not block people who disagree with her and discuss and back up theories,
Maybe she feels intimated by the amount of people attacking her who knows.
What are you so worked up over her?

Do you agree with her bullying people like Fiona O'Leary and sending hundreds of solictors letters out to anyone who questions her online?

Annasopra

Patty Hearst wrote: »

Ah yes the Unicorns...

I'm quite satisfied that I have conclusively proven the use of Unicorn imagery and trans/gender ideology

But as a great man once said of a certain caliber of Leftist

"As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it.... That's the tragedy of the situation"

Jaysus. A few pictures is proof of a grand conspiracy. Hilarious shyte.

Annasopra

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Absence of war in Wicklow perhaps.

I thought ISIS occupied the Wicklow Mountains according to Gemma?

Annasopra

SafeSurfer wrote: »

So it’s ok to hate people who hold obnoxious opinions and you get to decide whether opinions are obnoxious or not and in turn who it is acceptable to hate?

I didnt say I hate anyone or that I decide anything.

This isnt merely about opinion. It is about spreading extreme hateful propaganda. Gemma is an extreme hatemonger.

I am saying Gemma and her supporters spread extreme hate against Migrants, Refugees, LGBT people, Muslims. And I am saying Christchurch, Utoya and Batley and Spen are the clear result of the type of extreme hate mongering Gemma spreads.

Lets face it people talk about Radicalising Muslims but Gemma and her ilk are also extreme hate mongering radicalising forces too.

super_furry

I see Gemma's going after the Irish nurses now, claiming that they're puppets of George Soros.

Meanwhile in San Diego we see the eventual consequence of those kind anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/28/john-earnest-san-diego-shooting-suspect-posted-open-letter-online

[Deleted User]

SafeSurfer wrote: »

So it’s ok to hate people who hold obnoxious opinions and you get to decide whether opinions are obnoxious or not and in turn who it is acceptable to hate?

Do you think those opinions are obnoxious and promote hate?

batgoat

SafeSurfer wrote: »

So it’s ok to hate people who hold obnoxious opinions and you get to decide whether opinions are obnoxious or not and in turn who it is acceptable to hate?

Her remarks on terror attacks are beyond obnoxious, she took advantage of them to push conspiracies and increase her profile in the process. I don't hate Gemma, I just think she has behaved atrociously and is an incredibly nasty person. That's based on her actions. Next thing you'll be saying that people are being mean to Alex Jones...

jeremyj1968

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

I always find it amazing that some people who never had an interest in womens rights or lgbt rights suddenly find interest in order to express their divisive rhetoric against islam

When the yes vote was being promoted by the media in the last two referenda, anybody who voted NO was battered around the head with terms like homophobe and misogynist. I just expect people from religions that ARE are actually homophobic and misogynistic to be held to the same standard. But very obvious exceptions are made.

[Deleted User]

jeremyj1968 wrote: »

When the yes vote was being promoted by the media in the last two referenda, anybody who voted NO was battered around the head with terms like homophobe and misogynist. I just expect people from religions that ARE are actually homophobic and misogynistic to be held to the same standard. But very obvious exceptions are made.

The Catholic church and those that support them are both homophobic and misogynistic something that they have in common with most religions, unless your claiming that their not.

[Deleted User]

jeremyj1968 wrote: »

When the yes vote was being promoted by the media in the last two referenda, anybody who voted NO was battered around the head with terms like homophobe and misogynist..

In my experience, the only people who were battered around the head with terms like homophobe and misogynist were homophobes and misogynist. Respectful disagreement was met with respectful criticism, by and large.

jackboy

DubInMeath wrote: »

The Catholic church and those that support them are both homophobic and misogynistic something that they have in common with most religions, unless your claiming that their not.

Yes but the Catholic Church don’t execute gay people.

Timberrrrrrrr

jackboy wrote: »

Yes but the Catholic Church don’t execute gay people.

Neither does islam, islamic extremists do! But then we have christian extremists who kill people because of thier beliefs too.

jackboy

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Neither does islam, islamic extremists do! But then we have christian extremists who kill people because of thier beliefs too.

The scale is orders of magnitude different. But, you know that.

Timberrrrrrrr

jackboy wrote: »

The scale is orders of magnitude different. But, you know that.

Ah so christian terrorists are not as bad as islamic terrorists because they don't kill as many innocent people :rolleyes:

jackboy

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Ah so christian terrorists are not as bad as islamic terrorists because they don't kill as many innocent people :rolleyes:

Are you taking the piss. Obviously I meant that the number of Islamic terrorists are orders of magnitude greater than the numbers of Christian terrorists.