Guy:Incognito wrote: » .
DubInMeath wrote: » What's with the lgbt style avatar on your profile by the way?
Charles Ingles wrote: » Guy:Incognito wrote: » No you wont, you'll keep saying different things or asking questions back at people to try bury the question you refused to answer. I only have 1 account btw. I fail to see what would be gained by switching between 2 accounts so you can refuse to answer 2 people instead of 1. Ok so you logged out of Winnie the poo. Grand so , now what question would you like answered?
Guy:Incognito wrote: » No you wont, you'll keep saying different things or asking questions back at people to try bury the question you refused to answer. I only have 1 account btw. I fail to see what would be gained by switching between 2 accounts so you can refuse to answer 2 people instead of 1.
Charles Ingles wrote: » All scandals and cover ups are only exposed by whistle blowing. Placing questions on the public record on the issue of chemtrails would be a start
Larbre34 wrote: » No current public representative, even Mick Wallace et al. would touch that bullshyte. Try asking a public rep to put a question on it, see what reaction you get. And it'd just the reaction it deserves. Jesus I thought the world might actually become more enlightened as we moved through the 21st Century, but I actually worry for humanity now in a post-truth pseudo-science world. Any old kind of dangerous, seditious and irresponsible bollocks is fair game.
Guy:Incognito wrote: » Again, calling out her bull**** and saying why its bull**** is not shutting her down. She can self publish all she wants. Saying shes being shut down doent make it so. The only one doing any shutting down is her when she blocks anyone that questions her. If her opinions hold up, why does she need to block people?
Charles Ingles wrote: » Are you posting from two different accounts?
lbc2019 wrote: » Some of her posts on twitter lately seem to be off the charts.
batgoat wrote: » Most posters are a bit sick of your postings so you'll find loads that consider you to be deflecting.
Charles Ingles wrote: » I agree with you she should not block people who disagree with her and discuss and back up theories, Maybe she feels intimated by the amount of people attacking her who knows. What are you so worked up over her?
ogsjw wrote: » You can't make an OP like this and not post examples, it's illegal.
DubInMeath wrote: » So your aligning yourself with Muslims who feel the same way but hate Muslims that's some mental gymnastics alright. I'd say you'd hate yourself if you got a black eye. What's with the lgbt style avatar on your profile by the way?
Patty Hearst wrote: » I dont recall ever saying I hated Muslims. Thats some real Cathy Newman style reasoning you have. I also have no problem with the LGBT community. What I do have a problem with is Dildo wielding, foul mouthed, hyper sexualised people engaging with children. I suspect you'll find most people feel the same.
Charles Ingles wrote: » My only argument is the lady has the right to opinions I don't agree with her on everything. But my defense of her is only for her right to say whatever she likes. It's the rush to shut her down , deplatform her and call her crazy. A lot of personal attacks on messenger rather than the points she makes. Seems like their is mob waiting in th long grass for her,It the motivation of her critics I wonder about
Patty Hearst wrote: » You can be sure they're tied in some way to PBP, Soc Dems, Sinn Fein and various parasitical NGO orgs. In fact I have a few personal acquaintances who suffer (as those here do) from 'GDS' or 'Gemma Derangement Syndrome' and each of them are tied to one or other of the above. Its a real pity because if they put as much energy into attacking the corrupt elements of the Irish Political sphere we might actually get somewhere in this country. But alas they're fully on board the gravy train and have a taste of that sweet taxpayer moolah and will not give it up. Gemma of course is doing her best to derail that train and this is one reason why they have lapsed into Gemma Derangement Syndrome
CosmicFool wrote: » Your trolling is better than most. Well done.
batgoat wrote: » And unicorns... They're not dildo wielding or anything so clearly you have unique concerns.
Charles Ingles wrote: » My only argument is the lady has the right to opinions I don't agree with her on everything. But my defense of her is only for her right to say whatever she likes. It's the rush to shut her down , deplatform her and call her crazy. A lot of personal attacks on messenger rather than the points she makes. Seems like their is mob waiting in th long grass for her, It the motivation of her critics I wonder about
Patty Hearst wrote: » Ah yes the Unicorns... I'm quite satisfied that I have conclusively proven the use of Unicorn imagery and trans/gender ideology But as a great man once said of a certain caliber of Leftist "As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it.... That's the tragedy of the situation"
Larbre34 wrote: » You know what, she DOESN'T have the right to dangerous, baseless and subversive opinions. You ask why are we so worked up over her? Because she and her ilk prey on the vulnerable, the ignorant and the weakest in society to shore up their vanity projects. They are dangerous.. WHO figures quoted by the head of the Irish College of GPs yesterday - Notified cases of measles in the EU in 2005; five thousand. Cases in 2018? 85 f*cking thousand.... All thanks to dangerous fools like her and the long discredited anti-vaxx "theory" Maybe we can spray a few chemtrails to protect the babies too young to be vaccinated or those with compromised immune systems from the stupid fool parents who would kill them by socialising unvaccinated kids for their own misguided vanity. I swear to f**k it makes my blood boil.
SafeSurfer wrote: » Have you considered that the rise in measles cases in Europe could be a result of the huge influx of people from countries who were never vaccinated rather than as a consequence of a small percentage of anti vaxers?
batgoat wrote: » Unicorns can be used in two different contexts, you are aware of this right? It's also the National animal of Scotland, is that also a part of the plot?
Patty Hearst wrote: » And isn't it strange that many of the same people who decry Anti Vaxers also advocate for the unchecked importation of multitudes of Un Vaccinated people?
DubInMeath wrote: » Nope and no evidence offended to backup your brainwashing theory either.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wf.vanillicon.com/v2/f07ee44b0b39bbb635066da4046d9475.svg)