gandalf wrote: » So translated you cannot back up your assertions. Just like your poster girl then.
Charles Ingles wrote: » I can back up any point I've mad anything you like me to elaborate on?
gandalf wrote: » Now what are you basing your utterances about autism on? Which studies? Which papers? I hope it's not just your general observations from the good old days when your kids went to school?
gandalf wrote: » I asked you this yesterday and you ignored it. A number of others posters asked you similar questions.
Charles Ingles wrote: » That's not what I said my point was the alarming increased rates with no explanation for the rise. I don't buy into the better diagnosis thing, it could be diet it could be vaccines nobody knows, as I stated my children were all vaccinated but people have the right to ask questions and not trust big corporations blindly
batgoat wrote: » There's no increase, people tend to have entered adult life and not have been diagnosed. Dyslexia diagnoses also increased. Plenty of older people with dyslexia who never got diagnosed.
gandalf wrote: » Yes what are you basing this on because that's not facts, that is just your opinion. So there are no facts at all. Thanks for clearing that up.
Charles Ingles wrote: » You can't credible say there is no increase world wide according to the American scientific journal "The prevalence of autism in the United States has risen steadily since researchers first began tracking it in 2000. The rise in the rate has sparked fears of an autism 'epidemic.' But experts say the bulk of the increase stems from a growing awareness of autism and changes to the condition's diagnostic criteria." They explained the rise is better diagnosis , you said there was no rise do which is it ? Also people dismiss personal observations as anecdotes ,but lived experiences are truth I've seen a huge rise with my own eyes
Charles Ingles wrote: » I've just quoted the American scientific journal the fact is there is a rise in autism world wide, I just don't think the explanation is better diagnosis
Charles Ingles wrote: » Have you ever heard of Thalidomide drug the attempted cover up with lies, big pharma can't be trusted. Some people don't want to give their kids certain vaccines that's ok, Autism is on the increase at alarming rates but nobody is allowed to question what is in these vaccines.
Is there no real increase in autism rates, then? Awareness and changing criteria probably account for the bulk of the rise in prevalence, but biological factors might also contribute, says Durkin. For example, having older parents, particularly an older father, may boost the risk of autism. Children born prematurely also are at increased risk of autism, and more premature infants survive now than ever before.
Odhinn wrote: » She's associating with justin barrett now.
Flange/Flanders wrote: » Thalidomide wasnt covered up, the effects were reported within a couple of years.
gandalf wrote: » And I've provided a link to the article it clearly says that the bulk of the increase can clearly be attributed to diagnosis. You're not very good at backing up your opinions with any sort of proof are you.
Charles Ingles wrote: » Do you honestly not think Environmental, dietary or possible medical side effects might be a possible alternative as an explanation for the rise
gandalf wrote: » Show me a credible source for this and I'll consider it, I suspect you can't. I mean you just posted an article as proof for your assertions that actually contradicted them? I think even you can understand why some of us consider your contributions here are without merit if that is the level of backup you can provide.
Charles Ingles wrote: » Well fortunately the future of humanity doesn't hang on the outcome of our conversation, we are just two anonymous people on the internet having a conversation exchanging opinions. I will agree my opinion is based on a hunch or a feeling ,but that's ok too I'm not trying to change anybody's mind just stating an opinion
gandalf wrote: » Btw I'm on a ferry from France so I'll be offline for 20 hours but I look forward to being educated by the lucent and credible proof that Charles ingles is going to post in the meantime when I arrive back in Ireland ðŸ˜
CosmicFool wrote: » Would the increase in Autism be that there's an increase in the population and also better detection of Autism than before? Women are having children later in their lives now so it would cause more complications not just with autism but other issues too
circadian wrote: » Convinced Charles is my father in law.
Charles Ingles wrote: » You know the child birth in later life could be another factor , never thought of that very good point,
Charles Ingles wrote: » I've to bring Mrs ingles to bingo now, I'll be back later to finish off kicking all your backsides in this debate.