Charles Ingles wrote: » Why are you all so concerned about shutting her down.if you don't agree with her why follow her in Twitter Facebook asking her questions. Just leave her to her opinions why so worked up about this. I like her she is a breath of fresh air
WinnyThePoo wrote: » She's a quak who is taking advantage of some very very gullible people. She represents the dumbing down of society. I'll give her that.
Patty Hearst wrote: » She also tweeted this, looks like its from a primary school. Hold on..I thought the whole Unicorn/LGBT school thing was all a big conspiracy theory?
Charles Ingles wrote: » Or the awakening of society, maybe she is right, hence the rush to silence her
Patty Hearst wrote: » Not only is she a joker, she's quite the charmer too.. Lovely person
eviltwin wrote: » Just because a certain group use an image doesn't mean everyone using that image is part of the same group The rainbow is a gay symbol so does that follow that every depiction of a rainbow is being used in the same way?
Charles Ingles wrote: » WinnyThePoo wrote: » She's a quak who is taking advantage of some very very gullible people. She represents the dumbing down of society. I'll give her that. Or the awakening of society, maybe she is right, hence the rush to silence her
Patty Hearst wrote: » The point here is that the Unicorn is used as a symbol of LGBT..which it is. There's any amount of evidence to prove this. Many on here and elsewhere rubbish this claim when its demonstrably true. Taking that into account, a short stroll through any of Dunnes, Next, Tescos or any shop which carries childrens clothes, stationary, toys etc will illustrate that the unicorn symbol is absolutely everywhere.
batgoat wrote: » And this is relevant to the discussion? It's what Gemma said. The user could make hard-core porn. Still would not be relevant.
Charles Ingles wrote: » In my opinion Chemtrails = yes Autism liked to vacation= yes ATM robberies= yes being allowed to happen
Charles Ingles wrote: » Traitors in government= check Global elite = check Increased crime with immigration = check Where was she wrong?
pjohnson wrote: » Because as with the anti-vax eejits there are people tooo stupid for their own good and will believe anything she says. Its the same reason people put things out of the reach of children. Protect then from harming themselves
Charles Ingles wrote: » In my opinion Chemtrails = yes Bleach curing autism = no Autism liked to vacation= yes Pennys t shirt = don't know ATM robberies= yes being allowed to happen Don't know about swamp monster things
batgoat wrote: » You're very gullible...
Charles Ingles wrote: » Have you ever heard of Thalidomide drug the attempted cover up with lies, big pharma can't be trusted. Some people don't want to give their kids certain vaccines that's ok, Autism is on the increase at alarming rates but nobody is allowed to question what is in these vaccines.
super_furry wrote: » And there we have the crux of it. You're one of those 'vaccines cause autism' headbangers. Despite all the evidence being to the contrary, you are somehow more intelligent than the entire medical profession, who are secretly all in league with the lizard people anyway.
Charles Ingles wrote: » Amazing all the people who want to shut down debate or different opinions. Then they label people Nazis just because they don't agree with them. A lot of what Gemma says 100% correct. The more they attack her the closer she must be to the truth
Charles Ingles wrote: » Some people don't want to give their kids certain vaccines that's ok,
Charles Ingles wrote: » Would you offer an opinion for the rise in autism? I think it's to di with diet/ pesticides , maybe some cases could be linked to vaccines or maybe not. But debating an issue doesn't make me a "headbanger"
Charles Ingles wrote: » Have you ever heard of Thalidomide drug the attempted cover up with lies, big pharma can't be trusted.
Some people don't want to give their kids certain vaccines that's ok,
Autism is on the increase at alarming rates but nobody is allowed to question what is in these vaccines.
dan1895 wrote: » No it is far from ok. There has been over 200% increase in measles recently. How is that ok?
mzungu wrote: » There are no more or less people with autism now than there was before. The difference is we are better at diagnosing now than before. A few decades ago those with ASD would have been labelled "difficult" and after that they were forgotten about. Just to add, areas with high and low vaccination uptake have the same rates of ASD. So it's not the vaccinations.
Charles Ingles wrote: » Autism liked to vacation= yes
Olivia, my eldest daughter, caught measles when she was seven years old. As the illness took its usual course I can remember reading to her often in bed and not feeling particularly alarmed about it. Then one morning, when she was well on the road to recovery, I was sitting on her bed showing her how to fashion little animals out of coloured pipe-cleaners, and when it came to her turn to make one herself, I noticed that her fingers and her mind were not working together and she couldn't do anything. "Are you feeling all right?" I asked her. "I feel all sleepy," she said. In an hour, she was unconscious. In twelve hours she was dead. The measles had turned into a terrible thing called measles encephalitis and there was nothing the doctors could do to save her. That was twenty-four years ago in 1962, but even now, if a child with measles happens to develop the same deadly reaction from measles as Olivia did, there would still be nothing the doctors could do to help her. On the other hand, there is today something that parents can do to make sure that this sort of tragedy does not happen to a child of theirs. They can insist that their child is immunised against measles. I was unable to do that for Olivia in 1962 because in those days a reliable measles vaccine had not been discovered. Today a good and safe vaccine is available to every family and all you have to do is to ask your doctor to administer it. It is not yet generally accepted that measles can be a dangerous illness. Believe me, it is. In my opinion parents who now refuse to have their children immunised are putting the lives of those children at risk. In America, where measles immunisation is compulsory, measles like smallpox, has been virtually wiped out. Here in Britain, because so many parents refuse, either out of obstinacy or ignorance or fear, to allow their children to be immunised, we still have a hundred thousand cases of measles every year. Out of those, more than 10,000 will suffer side effects of one kind or another. At least 10,000 will develop ear or chest infections. About 20 will die. LET THAT SINK IN. Every year around 20 children will die in Britain from measles. So what about the risks that your children will run from being immunised? They are almost non-existent. Listen to this. In a district of around 300,000 people, there will be only one child every 250 years who will develop serious side effects from measles immunisation! That is about a million to one chance. I should think there would be more chance of your child choking to death on a chocolate bar than of becoming seriously ill from a measles immunisation. So what on earth are you worrying about? It really is almost a crime to allow your child to go unimmunised. The ideal time to have it done is at 13 months, but it is never too late. All school-children who have not yet had a measles immunisation should beg their parents to arrange for them to have one as soon as possible. Incidentally, I dedicated two of my books to Olivia, the first was 'James and the Giant Peach'. That was when she was still alive. The second was 'The BFG', dedicated to her memory after she had died from measles. You will see her name at the beginning of each of these books. And I know how happy she would be if only she could know that her death had helped to save a good deal of illness and death among other children.
