Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » So it would have been ok to open fire on the idiots marching down oconnell st last week as they were in "uniform"?
FrancieBrady wrote: » It's all very easy to dismiss support for these groups. But I was suprised to hear a security expert on radio this morning say that they have support in Derry in the 1000 people range.
Tomas81 wrote: » Again.... read my posts saoradh aren't republicans they are crims.
Farawayhome wrote: » The British army presence is a problem. They are stoking the tensions. Knowing how they behaved in the past, not only the murders but the intimidation and beatings they handed out, they are not looked upon favourably by any Nationalist but especially by those in Derry. Them throwing their weight around will only increase support for these groups like the New IRA.
Aegir wrote: » Can you not tell the difference between the police and the army? It’s not difficult.
Matt Barrett wrote: » Sounds like a conspiracy theory to me. You're dismissing genuine people with genuine issues because you may not agree with them. I think shooting some young journalist dead, even by mistake, wouldn't be filled under 'sticking it to the man'.
Mortelaro wrote: » You miss my point I'm not saying they'd be stupid to advocate that I said any party My point is the only voters they'd have left is a few hundred of the 'new' IRA crowd because they'd love it They haven't got the memo on democracy yet Sigh,there are about 1 million Brits in NI,so I'd imagine you know,they take offense at the Brits out and enemy forces lingo used by anyone really Its a by the by anyway as my example was to say putting shooting psni to the vote wouldn't win many votes
Tomas81 wrote: » Your relations were asked for money by the IRA?
Farawayhome wrote: » I never said that the PIRA were angels. They did some horrible things. What I'm saying is that they mostly stuck with military targets, the stats back that up. The stats also show that the British side were the terrorists. They targetted innocent people. They killed over 1,000 civilians.
rosser44 wrote: » So about 1% of the population, in a republican stronghold??? Ya, a force to be reckoned with. /s
Seth Brundle wrote: » No no no. The IRA didn't ask them for money. The IRA *told* them that if they didn't pay towards the cause their shop would be burnt down. You tried to suggest that they weren't terrorists. Which they most definitely were!
timthumbni wrote: » Of course violent republicans have a history in Londonderry for shooting 29 year old woman. Joanne Mathers was a 29 year old Protestant woman who the IRA shot dead on someone’s doorstep as she committed the ghastly crime in the eyes of weirdo bloodthirsty republicans of taking a census. She was the mother of a one year old baby. Again perhaps the laughable so called green book or whatever it’s called needs updated. This latest rebranding of the Ira appears to be following the same path of insane violence with bomb and bullet that the provies did a few years back so maybe they are using the old provo textbook. All with the same sad, predictable outcome. Not of anything being united of course but the exact opposite.
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » Genuine issues?? Jesus wept. Have they also got “genuine” aims of bringing back daily bombings, punishment beatings and hundreds of civilians deaths? Or have they “genuine” concerns over who controls the drug trade and other criminal rackets?
BBFAN wrote: » Ah come on Matt, I have the utmost respect for your posts most of the time. But I can also recognise that there is definitely an element out there who will support anything simply because they have no lives. If you listen regularly to radio you'll notice these guys. They are regular callers to every single radio station so they've obviously nothing else to do with their day. It's sad but true that these people are just looking for somewhere to belong, company or attention.
FrancieBrady wrote: » If anyone can exploit the death of an innocent it would be you Tim.
Farawayhome wrote: » So the British army were not there?
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » And if anyone can defend it or make an excuse for it it's you frankie.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I condemned it and I am totally against dissident activity.
batgoat wrote: » An innocent woman was murdered by the New Ira, maybe cop on and stop treating her as collateral damage. The British are not those at fault for what happened. I hope those responsible are put away for a very long time.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » And yet you have been making excuses for them, yeah..... you're totally against it
Tomas81 wrote: » Where did this allegedly happen Seth?
Seth Brundle wrote: » from what I've learned it was far from an isolated incident?
Farawayhome wrote: » There's no one condoning the murder of Lyra! No one wants a return to violence. The presence of the British army is a threat to that. This needs to be questioned. Why are they there?
Seth Brundle wrote: » So you're saying that its not the fault of the criminal who pulled the trigger?
Farawayhome wrote: » Where did you pull that one out of? What I'm questioning is what are the British army doing on the streets of Derry? We all know their disgusting history, no one wants to see the bloodshed caused by them repeated. The march by Saoradh has been questioned, why not this also?
Seth Brundle wrote: » (There's no allegedly about it) Why does it matter where it occurred as from what I've learned it was far from an isolated incident?