RobMc59 wrote: » But more importantly will it change the minds of the gob****es who did it?
FrancieBrady wrote: » There will be no peace in Ireland until we deal with partition.
El_Bee wrote: » Do we not have antifa over here that would beat theses guys up?
ToddyDoody wrote: » I suppose the UVF have to hold a march now in Belfast?
Richard Hillman wrote: » These guys are of the same persuasion as ANTIFA.
FrancieBrady wrote: » No. The harsh reality here is as it has always been. There will be no peace in Ireland until we deal with partition. And that is not to condone or excuse what happened. I fully support the GFA, which is the process that will deal with it one day.
Coillte_Bhoy wrote: » If some of these marchers were 'martyred', see the reaction from Dubs then, eh?
Stovepipe wrote: » Within sight of the Border, being refused service by a mechanic when he heard my accent and saw the Southern plates on my car. I had to take the car up the road to another car mechanic, who was a Catholic. When I explained to him that the other guy had refused to sort me out, he laughed and said that the other guy musn't like money, given the sheer amount of Southern cars that passed that way. I've also had the "park it around the back" advice more than once. I was also refused service in a shop once, in a very Loyalist area, until I asked for directions to a well-known local's establishment and then they were suddenly helpful.....folks is strange ;-)
RobMc59 wrote: » You do support the GFA but I doubt very much the neanderthals who shot that poor girl give a hoot for the GFA-we all argue and bicker about border polls,banners and brexit but this is different-these people marching in paramilitary uniform so soon after the tragic killing in Derry is an insult to the memory of that poor girl and certainly isn't anyone else's fault.
source wrote: » While I don't agree with them and hate that the North is hurtling back towards its old ways. I believe fundamentally in Bunreacht na hÉireann, and it is clear that they have the right to match like they did even if any right minded person agrees that it is not only in poor taste, but downright dangerous to give them a platform. "Bunreacht wrote: 6 1° the state guarantees liberty for the exercise of the following rights, subject to public order and morality: i. the right of the citizens to express freely their convictions and opinions. the education public opinion being, however, a matter of such grave import to the common good, the state shall endeavour to ensure that organs of public opinion, such as the radio, the press, the cinema, while preserving their rightful liberty of expression, including criticism of Government policy, shall not be used to undermine public order or morality or the authority of the state. the publication or utterance of seditious or indecent matter is an offence which shall be punishable in accordance with law. ii. the right of the citizens to assemble peaceably and without arms. Provision may be made by law to prevent or control meetings which are determined in accordance with law to be calculated to cause a breach of the peace or to be a danger or nuisance to the general public and to prevent or control meetings in the vicinity of either house of the oireachtas. iii. The right of the citizens to form associations and unions. laws, however, may be enacted for the regulation and control in the public interest of the exercise of the foregoing right. They were committing an offence under Section 264 of the Defence Act. Why weren't they arrested and taken away?
"Bunreacht wrote: 6 1° the state guarantees liberty for the exercise of the following rights, subject to public order and morality: i. the right of the citizens to express freely their convictions and opinions. the education public opinion being, however, a matter of such grave import to the common good, the state shall endeavour to ensure that organs of public opinion, such as the radio, the press, the cinema, while preserving their rightful liberty of expression, including criticism of Government policy, shall not be used to undermine public order or morality or the authority of the state. the publication or utterance of seditious or indecent matter is an offence which shall be punishable in accordance with law. ii. the right of the citizens to assemble peaceably and without arms. Provision may be made by law to prevent or control meetings which are determined in accordance with law to be calculated to cause a breach of the peace or to be a danger or nuisance to the general public and to prevent or control meetings in the vicinity of either house of the oireachtas. iii. The right of the citizens to form associations and unions. laws, however, may be enacted for the regulation and control in the public interest of the exercise of the foregoing right.
FrancieBrady wrote: » No. The harsh reality here is as it has always been. There will be no peace in Ireland until we deal with partition. .
Aegir wrote: » That is exactly what you are doing. Partition has been dealt with. It is an accepted fact all across this island that partition exists and that is the majority in the north wanted to change it, then it will be changed. It’s people like you, making excuses like this, that gives the young thugs justification for their actions.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Rent a Crowd, mostly from NI I am guessing. They would not march in Derry, so they come South for the craic, a few days after an awful murder of a young journalist. Words fail me. But I agree, let them march and deny them the oxygen of publicity if they were banned.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You have my condemnation of this latest in a long line of acts, .
janfebmar wrote: » Because they hit the journalist. You never condemned "the lads" when they hit the police, their intended target.
AudreyHepburn wrote: » Those who marched and those who support them should be ashamed of themselves. The protest in itself may have appeared peaceful but the aim of and reasons behind it are anything but. Saoradh, like the IRA and the UVF (or any other paramilitary outfit you care to name) are criminals and thugs, nothing more. It worries me that people are willing to turn a blind eye to the real meaning behind this and marches like it; intimidation.
mikeym wrote: » They cant dress up in Army gear up North so they come down here and march down O Connell street. Leave them play soldiers
Zaph wrote: » Even if there had been no trouble in Derry and Lyra McKee hadn't been killed, those people shouldn't have been allowed anywhere near the streets of Dublin. For them to march at a time like this shows exactly how little they actually care about anyone who doesn't share their ideals.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I have condemned this act already - whosoever was the target. Read the main thread.
janfebmar wrote: » But you never condemned attacks on the police.
Feisar wrote: » My only issue is if one decides who or who not is allowed to march yer heading down a dark road. Sometimes we have to give scum their way for the greater good.