janfebmar wrote: » Because they hit the journalist. You never condemned "the lads" when they hit the police, their intended target.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You have my condemnation of this latest in a long line of acts, .
El_Bee wrote: » Do we not have antifa over here that would beat theses guys up?
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Rent a Crowd, mostly from NI I am guessing. They would not march in Derry, so they come South for the craic, a few days after an awful murder of a young journalist. Words fail me. But I agree, let them march and deny them the oxygen of publicity if they were banned.
Aegir wrote: » That is exactly what you are doing. Partition has been dealt with. It is an accepted fact all across this island that partition exists and that is the majority in the north wanted to change it, then it will be changed. It’s people like you, making excuses like this, that gives the young thugs justification for their actions.
FrancieBrady wrote: » No. The harsh reality here is as it has always been. There will be no peace in Ireland until we deal with partition. .
source wrote: » While I don't agree with them and hate that the North is hurtling back towards its old ways. I believe fundamentally in Bunreacht na hÉireann, and it is clear that they have the right to match like they did even if any right minded person agrees that it is not only in poor taste, but downright dangerous to give them a platform. "Bunreacht wrote: 6 1° the state guarantees liberty for the exercise of the following rights, subject to public order and morality: i. the right of the citizens to express freely their convictions and opinions. the education public opinion being, however, a matter of such grave import to the common good, the state shall endeavour to ensure that organs of public opinion, such as the radio, the press, the cinema, while preserving their rightful liberty of expression, including criticism of Government policy, shall not be used to undermine public order or morality or the authority of the state. the publication or utterance of seditious or indecent matter is an offence which shall be punishable in accordance with law. ii. the right of the citizens to assemble peaceably and without arms. Provision may be made by law to prevent or control meetings which are determined in accordance with law to be calculated to cause a breach of the peace or to be a danger or nuisance to the general public and to prevent or control meetings in the vicinity of either house of the oireachtas. iii. The right of the citizens to form associations and unions. laws, however, may be enacted for the regulation and control in the public interest of the exercise of the foregoing right. They were committing an offence under Section 264 of the Defence Act. Why weren't they arrested and taken away?
"Bunreacht wrote: 6 1° the state guarantees liberty for the exercise of the following rights, subject to public order and morality: i. the right of the citizens to express freely their convictions and opinions. the education public opinion being, however, a matter of such grave import to the common good, the state shall endeavour to ensure that organs of public opinion, such as the radio, the press, the cinema, while preserving their rightful liberty of expression, including criticism of Government policy, shall not be used to undermine public order or morality or the authority of the state. the publication or utterance of seditious or indecent matter is an offence which shall be punishable in accordance with law. ii. the right of the citizens to assemble peaceably and without arms. Provision may be made by law to prevent or control meetings which are determined in accordance with law to be calculated to cause a breach of the peace or to be a danger or nuisance to the general public and to prevent or control meetings in the vicinity of either house of the oireachtas. iii. The right of the citizens to form associations and unions. laws, however, may be enacted for the regulation and control in the public interest of the exercise of the foregoing right.
Coillte_Bhoy wrote: » If some of these marchers were 'martyred', see the reaction from Dubs then, eh?
Stovepipe wrote: » Within sight of the Border, being refused service by a mechanic when he heard my accent and saw the Southern plates on my car. I had to take the car up the road to another car mechanic, who was a Catholic. When I explained to him that the other guy had refused to sort me out, he laughed and said that the other guy musn't like money, given the sheer amount of Southern cars that passed that way. I've also had the "park it around the back" advice more than once. I was also refused service in a shop once, in a very Loyalist area, until I asked for directions to a well-known local's establishment and then they were suddenly helpful.....folks is strange ;-)
RobMc59 wrote: » But more importantly will it change the minds of the gob****es who did it?
RobMc59 wrote: » You do support the GFA but I doubt very much the neanderthals who shot that poor girl give a hoot for the GFA-we all argue and bicker about border polls,banners and brexit but this is different-these people marching in paramilitary uniform so soon after the tragic killing in Derry is an insult to the memory of that poor girl and certainly isn't anyone else's fault.
FrancieBrady wrote: » No. The harsh reality here is as it has always been. There will be no peace in Ireland until we deal with partition. And that is not to condone or excuse what happened. I fully support the GFA, which is the process that will deal with it one day.
Richard Hillman wrote: » These guys are of the same persuasion as ANTIFA.
ToddyDoody wrote: » I suppose the UVF have to hold a march now in Belfast?
FrancieBrady wrote: » There will be no peace in Ireland until we deal with partition.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You can be sure the death of an Irish journalist in Ireland won't change any minds in Westminster nor the level of care.
Anteayer wrote: » One of the single biggest problems is the DUP never signed up to the GFA and the idiots currently driving the the Tory Party, most of whom wouldn’t know how to find NI on a map, have put them into a power broking position and a confidence and supply arrangement. All this dismissal of NI border issues by senior Tories is unbelievably dangerous. From what I can see the DUP basically saw Brexit as an opportunity to undo the GFA and ensure there was less interference from the “south”. While there's clearly a strong majority in Westminster in favour of the GFA and I think May takes it very seriously, there's been a vocal minority who have been ranting and raving about how it's obsolete and so on and when you add in the jingoism in the tabloids and utterly uninformed online discussions etc etc it really doesn't help. Unfortunately, you've a heady mix of the same old .... stirrers and jingoistic nonsense and it's feeding into a rhetoric on the dissident republican side who have been looking for any excuse. The Northern Ireland Assembly needs to be running right now and it's fairly clear that's not going to happen while the DUP feel they've huge power in London. It May had any cop on she'd just deal with the LGBT rights issues, Irish language rights and abortion issue on a UK wide level, thus removing the excuses to keep blocking the assembly. I don't think the Tories fully realise that they're using a hornets nest as a political football.
FrancieBrady wrote: » It was always going to be the case that it would take a tragedy like this to waken people up to what has been growing since the GFA. Far too many people with the power and the responsibility to keep the process moving once again ignored the signs and the warning from those who knew what was happening. The guys marching down O'Connell street are not the ones we should be worrying about, it is those on both sides who don't believe that the GFA is the answer. And who can argue with them, when you see the state of the GFA now. Varadkar and May need to take action and take it very soon. Sitting around condemning is not good enough.
bilston wrote: » What have you experienced in Northern Ireland?