nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

lbc2019

Some of her posts on twitter lately seem to be off the charts.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

rgossip30

Edgware wrote: »

More Shiite than Sunni

You are making fun of Muslims

whippet

How any of her gullible ‘sheeple’ followers can still listen to her after some of the crank that she has retweeted today ... wow ... she would have no problem finding a million articles to support her insinuation that black was actually white

jackboy

Snickers Man wrote: »

You mean like Gaeilgeoirs? Feckers. Get rid of 'em. Off to the Arran Islands with the lot of 'em!! Harrumph!!!

No, I don’t mean like Gaelgeoirs.

Annasopra

I see Gemma is ranting about Unicorn indoctrination again.

TaurenDruid

Apparently Notre Dame was burned down by the state. Or the Freemasons. If it wasn't one, it was definitely the other...

sydthebeat

was it no the unicorn riding muslims?

is_that_so

For Forks Sake wrote: »

She does realise that :
(a) she's an election candidate
(B) election candidates are expected to debate and state their policies
(c) that people can actually see her tweets

???

She doesn't care just as long as it gives her the the oxygen of publicity. A complete no-hoper in any election.

For Forks Sake

is_that_so wrote: »

She doesn't care just as long as it gives her the the oxygen of publicity. A complete no-hoper in any election.

I was more thinking along the lines that in the near to not too distant future she's going to be called out on her nonsense in a public forum. The response should be interesting...

[Deleted User]

Fecking gay transexual unicorns are at it again, turning our nippers gay, she needs help guys :

https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1118266538123984897?s=20

[Deleted User]

is_that_so wrote: »

She doesn't care just as long as it gives her the the oxygen of publicity. A complete no-hoper in any election.

Going by some of the posters on here she will have some votes.

I would say any debate that she might be invited to attend on tv/radio as a candidate might be interesting with a competent host, even just for the reaction afterwards.

Ipso

Fieldog wrote: »

Fecking gay transexual unicorns are at it again, turning our nippers gay, she needs help guys :

https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1118266538123984897?s=20

Definitely got her finger on the pulse of main street.

jackboy

DubInMeath wrote: »

I would say any debate that she might be invited to attend on tv/radio as a candidate might be interesting with a competent host, even just for the reaction afterwards.

It’s highly unlikely that she would be invited on any debate.

batgoat

jackboy wrote: »

It’s highly unlikely that she would be invited on any debate.

They're probably worried about defamation to be fair.

paw patrol

Fieldog wrote: »

Fecking gay transexual unicorns are at it again, turning our nippers gay, she needs help guys :

https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1118266538123984897?s=20

she is right on that point.
There is a huge push for the LGBT agenda targeting kids. It goes way beyond equality.

Suppose no shortage of cool parents who want to deck the kids out in the clothing that gets them twitter scores and Pennys (and the rest) will provide.

batgoat

paw patrol wrote: »

she is right on that point.
There is a huge push for the LGBT agenda targeting kids. It goes way beyond equality.

Suppose no shortage of cool parents who want to deck the kids out in the clothing that gets them twitter scores and Pennys (and the rest) will provide.

Honestly, get over yourself.

CosmicFool

paw patrol wrote: »

she is right on that point.
There is a huge push for the LGBT agenda targeting kids. It goes way beyond equality.

Suppose no shortage of cool parents who want to deck the kids out in the clothing that gets them twitter scores and Pennys (and the rest) will provide.

What an ignorant pr**k you are.

[Deleted User]

Fieldog wrote: »

Fecking gay transexual unicorns are at it again, turning our nippers gay, she needs help guys :

https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1118266538123984897?s=20

If I'm not mistaken my sister had a top similar to the yellow one on the top right of that picture in the late 70s or early 80s.

A person could read into that a massive conspiracy to promote lgbt rights by the global industrial capitalist machine since then, if you're of a mind to, or simply that fashion repeats itself every few years.

Hint it's the latter.

BBFAN

paw patrol wrote: »

she is right on that point.
There is a huge push for the LGBT agenda targeting kids. It goes way beyond equality.

Suppose no shortage of cool parents who want to deck the kids out in the clothing that gets them twitter scores and Pennys (and the rest) will provide.

So scarlet for ya.

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

BBFAN

Since when did kids not love unicorns and rainbows?????

BBFAN

paw patrol wrote: »

she is right on that point.
There is a huge push for the LGBT agenda targeting kids. It goes way beyond equality.

Suppose no shortage of cool parents who want to deck the kids out in the clothing that gets them twitter scores and Pennys (and the rest) will provide.

From someone whose username is a dog cartoon.

Jesus, are you not worried about beastiality??

Faugheen

paw patrol wrote: »

she is right on that point.
There is a huge push for the LGBT agenda targeting kids. It goes way beyond equality.

Suppose no shortage of cool parents who want to deck the kids out in the clothing that gets them twitter scores and Pennys (and the rest) will provide.

Because when growing up as children, we had it enshrined in our minds that being LGBT was something so evil and weird and to hold against someone.

I certainly was homophobic as a teenager because I didn't know any better. It's only when a friend of mine came out that I began to educate myself.

Why is teaching kids about LGBT such a bitter pill to swallow?

kunst nugget

Faugheen wrote: »

paw patrol wrote: »

she is right on that point.
There is a huge push for the LGBT agenda targeting kids. It goes way beyond equality.

Suppose no shortage of cool parents who want to deck the kids out in the clothing that gets them twitter scores and Pennys (and the rest) will provide.

Because when growing up as children, we had it enshrined in our minds that being LGBT was something so evil and weird and to hold against someone.

I certainly was homophobic as a teenager because I didn't know any better. It's only when a friend of mine came out that I began to educate myself.

Why is teaching kids about LGBT such a bitter pill to swallow?

I've honestly never bought a unicorn top for my daughter to be a cool parent and indoctrinate her in the ways of the gays. She likes unicorns. That's all there is to it.

Annasopra

Faugheen wrote: »

Because when growing up as children, we had it enshrined in our minds that being LGBT was something so evil and weird and to hold against someone.

I certainly was homophobic as a teenager because I didn't know any better. It's only when a friend of mine came out that I began to educate myself.

Why is teaching kids about LGBT such a bitter pill to swallow?

Gemmas agenda needs to feed off having groups to hate. Simple.

Thats all there is to Gemma really. Hatemongering.

theguzman

Faugheen wrote: »

Because when growing up as children, we had it enshrined in our minds that being LGBT was something so evil and weird and to hold against someone.

I certainly was homophobic as a teenager because I didn't know any better. It's only when a friend of mine came out that I began to educate myself.

Why is teaching kids about LGBT such a bitter pill to swallow?

There is one thing to teach about respect and to understand about homosexuality etc, it is another entirely different ballgame to indoctrinate and effectively brainwash, sending children for gender reassignment surgery when they are having phases etc.

It is beyond sick and now there is a growing trend of pedophiles creeping out of the woodwork to latch onto the LGBT community and somehow self legitimise their own sick mindset. The vast vast majority of gay people are totally appalled by this and it is giving them all a bad rep.

Annasopra

theguzman wrote: »

There is one thing to teach about respect and to understand about homosexuality etc, it is another entirely different ballgame to indoctrinate and effectively brainwash, sending children for gender reassignment surgery when they are having phases etc.

It is beyond sick and now there is a growing trend of pedophiles creeping out of the woodwork to latch onto the LGBT community and somehow self legitimise their own sick mindset. The vast vast majority of gay people are totally appalled by this and it is giving them all a bad rep.

Nope. Its homophobic transphobic commentary like this that attempts to give us a bad name by linking us to child abuse. Thats the sick mindset.

Oh and children do not have gender reassignment surgery. Please stop posting fake news.

TaurenDruid

theguzman wrote: »

There is one thing to teach about respect and to understand about homosexuality etc, it is another entirely different ballgame to indoctrinate and effectively brainwash, sending children for gender reassignment surgery when they are having phases etc.

It is beyond sick and now there is a growing trend of pedophiles creeping out of the woodwork to latch onto the LGBT community and somehow self legitimise their own sick mindset. The vast vast majority of gay people are totally appalled by this and it is giving them all a bad rep.

The only place this is happening is in your imagination. And Gemma's.

For Forks Sake

theguzman wrote: »

There is one thing to teach about respect and to understand about homosexuality etc, it is another entirely different ballgame to indoctrinate and effectively brainwash, sending children for gender reassignment surgery when they are having phases etc.

It is beyond sick and now there is a growing trend of pedophiles creeping out of the woodwork to latch onto the LGBT community and somehow self legitimise their own sick mindset. The vast vast majority of gay people are totally appalled by this and it is giving them all a bad rep.

tumblr_lqtld84WlI1qeaf7s.gif?w=280&h=210&fit=crop

one world order

Faugheen wrote: »

Because when growing up as children, we had it enshrined in our minds that being LGBT was something so evil and weird and to hold against someone.

I certainly was homophobic as a teenager because I didn't know any better. It's only when a friend of mine came out that I began to educate myself.

Why is teaching kids about LGBT such a bitter pill to swallow?

Because homosexuality is a sin, same as adultery or stealing or lying. It is not how humans were created or meant to be. There is now a serious agenda by the luciferian worshipping illuminati to push homosexuality as normal behaviour which is being pushed in the classrooms, workplaces and mass produced mainstream media.

Mod user banned

whippet

one world order wrote: »

Because homosexuality is a sin, same as adultery or stealing or lying. It is not how humans were created or meant to be. There is now a serious agenda by the luciferian worshipping illuminati to push homosexuality as normal behaviour which is being pushed in the classrooms, workplaces and mass produced mainstream media.

Who says its a sin? A made up cloud based man with a beard ?

theguzman

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Nope. Its homophobic transphobic commentary like this that attempts to give us a bad name by linking us to child abuse. Thats the sick mindset.

Oh and children do not have gender reassignment surgery. Please stop posting fake news.

Yes they do and it is being facilitated and a 16 year old is a child and giving children Hormones to change their bodies? It is a case of Medical Science being rode roughshod over to enforce an agenda and they allowing it for fear of being labelled transphobic etc. In the UK parents have been threatened with having their children removed from their care if they did not agree to the gender transition.