Richard Hillman wrote: » Hopefully all money from the EU refused. The rebuild should be funded privately only. I have seen far too many iconic structures scarred with EU flags outside.
Mrcaramelchoc wrote: » Its amazing the rich French people are falling over themselves to donate money to fix a building.but poverty and homelessness are rife there to.i don't see the rich running to their aid.its a **** ing building.
rossie1977 wrote: » All in same area at La Defense Tour Montparnasse stands completely alone at 689 foot
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » The money that is being fired around is disturbing I'm sure the peasants felt the same way when they started building it
jimbobaloobob wrote: » I agree, i was only making the point to highlight how quickly media picks up on the rescue or revival of a western tragedy as opposed to a conflict area of the world.
kowloon wrote: »
Pretzill wrote: » An awful lot of money goes to charitable causes - a lot falls into the wrong hands and people still continue to suffer - I don't have a problem with the elite wanting to help restore this iconic building - the apple logo in stained glass may be a step too far though.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » You should start a thread on those atrocities when they happen and pledge some money.
Roger_007 wrote: » The 'forbidden fruit' features in many pieces of religious art, even with a bite,(byte), missing? It would be easy to slip it into a panel of a stained glass window. Speaking of windows, has Bill Gates promised anything yet?
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » . They have that money because they dont give to charity.
gozunda wrote: » Nah he's probably to busy investing in his business of fake meat to sell to the masses so he can make his next fortune. Some day instead of 'steaks' we will all be eating 'fakes' and paying some mega corporation for the privilege. All smoke and mirrors for sure.
smurgen wrote: » The amount of conspiracy theory crap coming out over this is just unbelievable.what the he'll is wrong with people.also trump is an idiot.andanyone suggesting helicopters is thick too.a dump of water would lead to a fast change in temperature for the stone masonry . Stone can crack or even explode if the go from hot to cold too fast.tge French firemen played a blinder.
smurgen wrote: » anyone suggesting helicopters is thick too.a dump of water would lead to a fast change in temperature for the stone masonry
smurgen wrote: » anyone suggesting helicopters is thick too.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » What burned and wasn’t reinstated? What new buildings went up? Every building that survives the guts of a thousands years will have some restoration work done.
gctest50 wrote: » The release of water, foam etc from a helicopter can be very controllable like this : So you can ram this insult :
zell12 wrote: » Interesting to see that ~1,000 people dead in the recent Cyclone Idai is viewed as less important than a building on fire.
rossie1977 wrote: » Smaller sure but the interior of Longford was completely destroyed which isn't the case with Notre Dame. I think 5 years that it can reopen to the public is an achievable timeline. Obviously you don't need the roof to be fully completed before reopening. La Sagrada Familia is undergoing construction for last 100+ years and it's open to the public