jimbobaloobob wrote: » €600,000,000 already pledged. It sits uncomfortable with me how quick big organisations are to pledge to restore a building when you think of some of the tragedies and atrocities like Darfur, Aleppo, Ethiopia, Haiti to name just four that we hear all so regular in the news after their disasters.
4ensic15 wrote: » St mel's Cathedral in Longford burned down and there was no great outpouring of grief in ireland or anywhere else. A burned cathedral is just that, a burned cathedral.
batgoat wrote: » If they want to replicate it precisely, it will cost billions. Longford Cathedral is tiny in contrast to it and far less complex a structure. So it's hardly comparing like with like.
B0jangles wrote: » I heard that and thought that has to be a mistranslation, but no, apparently he really thinks it can be done and done well in 5 years. That's sounds insane to me. I would have estimated that it'd take 5 years just to plan the project - to survey the rest of the building for any hidden damage, to identify and source the various materials and experts needed for each element that's been lost. Hopefully the promise will be put down as a heat of the moment thing and he will let it slide. I'd hate for this to turn into a massive rush job just to satisfy a politician's ego and desire to still be in power for the ribbon-cutting ceremony
Thargor wrote: » Paris is massive.
10000maniacs wrote: » And flat. Where are all the skyscrapers?
emilymemily wrote: » Money sent to these countries isnt used in the correct way, think of the billions that has been raised for parts of Africa over the last 20 - 30 years and theyre still poverty stricken countries with starvation, their education system is run by European volunteers that donate thousands to go over and still basic literacy skills are lacking among most of the population. The money gets eaten up by corrupt governments, organizations and charities.
The Rape of Lucretia wrote: » Its sorta Macron's Reichstag fire, and Falklands War, in one.
hmmm wrote: » I don't much like the Reichstag reference because it makes it sound like he engineered this
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Eh, leaving aside charitable donations we here in Ireland are contributing the bones of E750 million per annum to Foreign Aid. But anyway, there are still ads out there looking for more for their charities. I am baffled by that, but I suppose Empires need building.
Roger_007 wrote: » Im a bit suspicious of the motivation behind some of the very large donations which have been promised. If it is just a genuine wish to help rebuild the cathedral, then the donations could have been made anonymously. Otherwise it looks like availing of a golden opportunity to get good publicity.
Richard Hillman wrote: » Hopefully all money from the EU refused. The rebuild should be funded privately only. I have seen far too many iconic structures scarred with EU flags outside.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » I think this will turn out to be another Sagrada Familia. How many years are they restoring that now?
fryup wrote: » am i right in saying visitors were charged for going into ND? if so surely they made enough over the years to pay for this reconstruction?
vargoo wrote: » Money pledged, not given. Is their no insurance?
The French state’s policy is to bear the cost of reconstruction of historical monuments such as Notre-Dame cathedral in the event of disasters.