paw patrol wrote: » I don't think that is the what the OP is saying and you are twisting things. It's possible to have fully sympathy and support Sean Cox , which any right-thinking person should have and to also ask why in society certain cases get pushed hard while others are forgotten about. Sean Cox isn't a unique case but (thankfully for him) he has much more support than others in the same situation. I don't begrudge him that and I hope he recovers but we can and should be able to ask questions too. It's not obscene to ask these questions. Odd that you and others would think this as if we must all stay on script.
CarlosHarpic wrote: » Thanks. By the reaction of most on this thread you would think i was attacking the man. .
Guy:Incognito wrote: » Youve completely ignored the counter points though. There are the same type of events up and down the country constantly. Just on a smaller scale.
CarlosHarpic wrote: » I haven't ignored them because i generally agree with them. I never said anything against the events or fund raising. It's wonderful. But it only happened because of where it happened. ' .
CarlosHarpic wrote: » Thanks. By the reaction of most on this thread you would think i was attacking the man. These Liveline weponised sanctimonious types who completely twisted my statement around are the same types who think the McCanns are inspirational parents because they saw a photo of the child in an Everton jersey and they can 'relate' to that. Remember how the Irish went into a frenzy over the poor girls in Soham murdered about 15 years ago? The ONLY reason the Holly and Jessica story was huge in this country was because of the photo of the girls wearing Man United jerseys. Again the masses' relate' rather than have genuine compassion. No human tragedy is more important than another. But absolutely platitudes are on a sliding scale.
CarlosHarpic wrote: I haven't ignored them because i generally agree with them. I never said anything against the events or fund raising. It's wonderful. But it only happened because of where it happened. Most 'care' because its pop cultural and not due to compassion. Again the person who brought up Maddy McCann made a valid point. It's media hype that controls the masses 'empathy' .
orourkeda1977 wrote: » No. How can they? If people want to beat up opposing fans you cant blame the club on its own.
expectationlost wrote: » they could not play Roma until they really crack down on their violent supporters.
CarlosHarpic wrote: » I feel genuinely sorry for the man and his family and i wish them the best. But there are victims and families destroyed by violent crime every day and they are forgotten because it wasn't connected to the world of British soccer. If you get random attacked and suffer severe injuries pray that it's outside a British soccer ground because otherwise you're on your own and no will give a ****. Again, no disrespect to Mr Cox and his family, I just find people's attitude to this rather strange. I wish him a full recovery. What was done to him was disgusting but it goes on all the time in society.
chicorytip wrote: » I am not clear - and I doubt many are - as to the exact nature and extent of Mr. Cox's injuries. Has he suffered major irreparable brain damage? If not, then what is his long term prognosis? Could he recover to the extent of being able to live some semblance of a normal life without full time medical care? I would be interested to hear detailed answers to these questions before deciding whether or not make a donation toward his benefit. I would apply the same criteria for any similar type of case and am not casting any aspersions on the Cox family.
Ursus Horribilis wrote: » It's a shame that his family need to fund raise in the first place. There's not much of a safety net in this country if you suffer something catastrophic like he did. It's shocking that he has to leave the rehabilitation centre because his time is up.
CarlosHarpic wrote: » I haven't ignored them because i generally agree with them. I never said anything against the events or fund raising. It's wonderful. But it only happened because of where it happened. Most 'care' because its pop cultural and not due to compassion. Again the person who brought up Maddy McCann made a valid point. It's media hype that controls the masses 'empathy' .
chicorytip wrote: » what is his long term prognosis?
BBFAN wrote: » I was explaining to my son the other night that he had to leave the rehab place at the end of June and he couldn't believe it but that's the reality. There's a huge waiting list for that place. We need at least 3 more around the country.
Ursus Horribilis wrote: I thought the original post that started this thread was bad but this comment above is one of the worst things I've read on boards for a while. Is the evidence that's out there really not good enough for you?
Ursus Horribilis wrote: » I thought the original post that started this thread was bad but this comment above is one of the worst things I've read on boards for a while. Is the evidence that's out there really not good enough for you?