Kellygirl wrote: You’ll need a plan to keep yourself during the week too with a little less running ahead of you.
ReeReeG wrote: » Weds 3rd Apr Back up to Marlay for the last of the big sessions on this plan! Being a really wet and miserable evening, I almost had the park to myself and only saw one dog - the dream. 2 miles warm-up, followed by 5 x 5 mins @ CV (7.50 - 8.00 target pace), 2.5 min recoveries. Split paces: 7.50, 7.27, 7.33, 7.23, 7.22. Did them in the field in front of the big house, and I could tell when I was going too fast as I had to do just a bit more than the 1k lap. I did try stay disciplined but I suppose I also had it in the back of my mind that I can afford slightly faster given my last 10k, but these are still too fast for that I reckon. Enjoyable session though. 2 miles again to cool down.
ReeReeG wrote: » Abandoned my hard parkrun idea for the 2k time trial as per the plan (and after the advice on the grads thread). Marlay again, and just went in time for the group warm-up. Decided to do the first 3k at moderate-ish pace so the leap in pace for the last 2k wouldn't feel so extreme. The 2k should have been run at about 6.50 pace according to the calculator, but I just couldn't hold it. I could blame the forest section with the drag but honestly I just couldn't bring myself to push that bit more. 2k total time about 8.47. C'est la vie. Think I slowed on the last straight too instead of picking it up.
ReeReeG wrote: » Yeah, I need to figure out how to watch Netflix without the urge to snack constantly
ariana` wrote: » If you figure this out please do share with me Tesco sweet and salty popcorn is my latest guilty pleasure, even better with a bag of Maltesers thrown in on top
ReeReeG wrote: » Following this, I'm thinking of entering the Tullamore HM at end of August, which is 12 weeks later. I wouldn't mind trying one of the HM plans from Faster Road Racing, mostly out of curiosity than anything. What are peoples experiences with this plan if they've ever tried it?
skyblue46 wrote: » On the races you are doing and what week of what plan to jump back into....trust your judgement. You know you're looking at 2 sessions and a longish run each week. If you race then drop a session or the long run depending on the length of the race. Races are the fun part, if painful, so no point in missing out on them.
Huzzah! wrote: » Hi I've followed the lowest mileage half plan from FRR twice. I think my log started at some point during my second spin. I found MurphD's log helpful as he had followed it as well. It, in hindsight, might have been a bit of a jump for me and I struggled with the VO2 Max sessions - more the second time I did it than the first, for some reason, but I got through the plan both times well enough and got some decent PBs - maybe 3 minutes the first time and slightly less the second. I also managed PBs at 10 and 5k in the tune-up races that form part of the plan.Things I liked about the plan: 1. endurance runs were a lot of fun. I loved how strong I felt during them and they gave me confidence. 2. Two tune-up races in the cycle - most went well and I got some cheeky PBs along the way, one or two didn't. 3. The faster finish long runs (LT finish) - these were tough but great when they worked out. Nice to tie into a parkrun if you can manage it. 4. For me, the plan was really tough around maybe weeks 3-6 but then it got easier after that. It was nice the second time around knowing there was some respite to come. 5. I like "book" plans because you get a decent understanding of what you're trying to achieve in each session. 6. One or two of the long runs exceed the half distance, which I really liked.What I didn't like: 1. VO2 Max runs but that's more about the type of runner I am than the plan itself I should have reduced the reps to time based given my pace at the time. 2. It's only 4 days at the start and then it's only 5. I say "only" because it means you're doing a lot of big days when my preference is to train for 6 days but at lower distances and still achieve the same weekly mileage total. There's an 18k run at some point midweek which was mildly torturous after a long day in the office. 3. There's only one race-pace run and it's only 3k and it's at the end and it was really difficult both times, which dented my confidence. It was for this reason that I started to use Hanson plans. All in all, I'd probably use the plan again. I felt stronger during my Hanson goal races but maybe a better all rounder after Pfitz. That may well be down to how I chose my goal times, though.
Murph_D wrote: FRR and Hanson are as similar as they are different - both are based on the same general principles that most approaches have evolved towards: speed, tempo and long sessions, with easy/recovery runs making up the rest. The approach around pacing is very different - Hanson is long on specific race pace, Pfitzinger (as Huzzah! notes) has hardly any HMP at all. On balance, I personally favour Hanson, although I had broadly similar results with each plan, decent PBs knocking 3-4 mins off. I think Hanson makes you stronger, slightly, but that’s very subjective. The Pfitzinger plans have a bit more variety in the run variations, but theres not much in it.
Wubble Wubble wrote: Good luck tomorrow V. You've probably decided this already, but if you're not in the National 10k, I recommend starting in the 35-45 min pen. You're more than capable of going sub-45. Tomorrow will prove it.
Mr. Guappa wrote: Best of luck tomorrow V. You've put together a really excellent block of training and I really hope you knock it out of the park tomorrow.