unkel wrote: » For the record: I'm not advising anyone to install a Zappi in any other way than per the manufacturers spec I'm not installing a Zappi, I'm installing a battery inverter. From installation instructions I have seen online, people extend the provided (unshielded) cable for both clamps with standard unshielded cat 5 cable. That's what I'm going to do as well
unkel wrote: » You should really stop accusing me of having unsafe and dangerous DIY electrics. This is false and malicious. First you did it about my inverter that you claimed would back feed the grid if the grid went down. This is not possible as all inverters have anti-islanding protection built in. Which at the time you didn't seem to understand. And now you suggest I might cause a fire by using unshielded cat 5 cable for my inverter clamps as per the manufacturers' instructions? :rolleyes:
Silent Running wrote: » When I installed my Zappi clamp over a year ago the advice from Myenergi was to use any twisted pair cable. I had some 2 pair phone cable and some Cat 5 in the garage. I used the Cat 5. Just the first pair used (white/blue). It runs alongside the feed cable only for a couple of metres. I've had no issues with this setup. If I was transferring large amounts of important data across the cable I would have used screened cable. The clamp is only a sensor.
KCross wrote: » You dont think the data that that sensor is sending is important? Its not data just for info purposes (i.e. viewing in an app). Its key data to its successful operation to ensure you dont blow a fuse. The Zappi has to be able to sense load changes "instantly" so its monitoring that data 24/7. If it works for you, great. It wouldnt be for me. I'd rather follow their advice. The clamp in the box is screened so its not like its an after thought on their part.
Silent Running wrote: » The first sentence of my post.
stimpson wrote: » I don’t think screened should be absolutely necessary.
stimpson wrote: » Twisted pair is designed so interference on each cable in the pair cancels itself out. It is unlikely to cause an issue. In the event that there is an issue, then I’m sure the Zappi is designed to fail safe and not cause a catastrophic failure.
stimpson wrote: » I don’t think screened should be absolutely necessary. Twisted pair is designed so interference on each cable in the pair cancels itself out. It is unlikely to cause an issue. In addition, Cat6 is capable of carrying 10Gb/s over 55m. I doubt the cable is pushing anywhere close to 1Mb/s so even if there is severe interference it’s probably not enough to prevent a low bandwidth signal. I would be very surprised if there were any issues from this as long as the twists are maintained all the way along the cable. In the event that there is an issue, then I’m sure the Zappi is designed to fail safe and not cause a catastrophic failure.
jimmyging wrote: » Hi all , I am thinking of getting a zappi charger off my garage which is a bit away from the house but the garage only has this sub fuse board (see attached photo). I have been told that I may need a larger supply to the sub board from my main board which would be a royal pain ( internal wall and external wall and then 15 m stretch . Can any of you tell if this supply is sufficient or will I have to chase a 6 or a 10 square wire out to this board . Apologies if this is a little off thread .
Nedved85 wrote: » Just an update - My hub arrived last week, set it up over the weekend, bit of a convoluted/ trial and error job to be honest. They most certainly could improve/simplify the hub setup. Strange thing is I have to wait for the app to be released to actually see stats etc.
KCross wrote: » Unusually, your sub board in the pic has a 63A main fuse which is what you'd have in the main board so thats strange. That would suggest the board has enough capacity but your electrician needs to eyeball the cable feeding this board to ensure it matches that 63A fuse. Your Zappi will need 32A. What electrical devices/points do you have in the garage? Apart from lights and sockets what have you got? Whats that 4th item on the board feeding, the one with the black trip switch? The others just look like lights and sockets.
slave1 wrote: » I'm no electrician but would the electrician have installed a cable "strong" enough to this sub-board to handle the 32a load, I know the board say's 63a but that does not mean it can handle it if say, a 16a cable was used.... Correct me if I'm wrong
jimmyging wrote: » The other option is to take feed directly from the esb box but this voids the grant .. rock and hard place ..!
gunnerfitzy wrote: » I had this problem. I contacted myenergi and they stated that they now include a holster with each Zappi ordered to prevent this. They sent me out a holster free of charge. No issues with water ingress now.
They explained that Version 2 was brought about by changes introduced in January 2019 to the regulations. The changes mean that an a separate earth rod and an RCD with DC earth leakage protection to be part of the installation.
The MyEnergi email was quite informative and if there is interest I could copy some of the details here.
davidod1 wrote: » I contacted MyEnergi and after a couple of emails back and forth I received a very detailed response. They explained that the V1 was no longer available and that a Version 2 was coming in July. They explained that Version 2 was brought about by changes introduced in January 2019 to the regulations. The changes mean that an a separate earth rod and an RCD with DC earth leakage protection to be part of the installation.
KCross wrote: » Did they know you were in Ireland?
davidod1 wrote: » Taking in to consideration the above I was wondering if anyone would see anything wrong with going for the Version 1 and using the existing earth rod but including an RCD. This would be my preferred choice.
The zappi device should be connected to a single-phase 230V or 240V nominal AC supply. The supply should be from a dedicated 32A or 40A circuit breaker. zappi features and integral 30mA Type-A RCD, therefore an RCD protected supply is not required unless local regulations state otherwise.
KCross wrote: » Correct, thats more or less what I said.... "... but your electrician needs to eyeball the cable feeding this board to ensure it matches that 63A fuse."
jimmyging wrote: » Hi again I had electrician out yesterday for a look and feed to garage is nowhere near enough for even a 16A car charger so we have to get a feed from the Meter box or the main fuse board . The main fuse board is tricky to get to and will end up with s very disgruntled OH so.we decided to go with option of taking feed from esb meter box to the sub fuse board in the garage .This is the bit I don’t understand: the electrician said that doing this will make the garage sub fuse board the main fuse board which will actually suit if he’s right as I have plans to put in a solar pv array in the next few months and it would suit to have the main fuse board in the garage . Does that make sense ?
Meter - | Fused RCB or such | - Consumer Unit 1 - | Fused RCB or such | - Consumer Unit 2