Agent Coulson wrote: » In just under 10 years since Sheamus made is debut on the main roster (June '09) Irish wrestlers have has some decade in the WWE. The groundbreaking Sheamus, 1 X King of Ring. 1 X Royal Rumble winner. 1 X Money in the Bank winner. 2 X US Champion. 5 X Tag champion 1 X RAW & 4 X Smackdown. 1 X World Heavyweight Champion. 3 X WWE Champion. Finn Balor, 2 X Intercontinental champion. 1 X Universal Champion. Becky Lynch, 1 X Womens Royal Rumble. 3 X Smackdown Women's Champion. 1 X Raw Women's Champion. 1 X headliner of Wrestlemania.
Necro wrote: » Ah yeah I couldn't stay out of it myself. But AH certainly isn't a place to post a feel good thread on basically anything tbh. That it's being discussed is in itself an achievement imo. I pay no heed to the haters, I got the same smart arse stuff from my mates this morning as usual after Mania.
Mr.Nice Guy wrote: I tend to avoid After Hours for the reasons already mentioned but having read the thread it's a glimpse into what the wider general public does think about wrestling. There was a time when I think it would be viewed with less hostility.
TimesArrow wrote: There’s a thread over on the After Hours section congratulating Finn and Becky on WM and most of the comments are as you’d expect from people who just like to crap all over wrestling. I’ve heard it all personally for over years and generally keep my fandom to myself
nazmoalex wrote: » Starting a wrestling thread on After Hours is like lighting a match at a gastroenteritis convention.
TimesArrow wrote: » There’s a thread over on the After Hours section congratulating Finn and Becky on WM and most of the comments are as you’d expect from people who just like to crap all over wrestling. I’ve heard it all personally for over years and generally keep my fandom to myself
leggo wrote: » I mean...in the same sense you're 'allowed' make unsolicited comments to random people you come across in the street and everyday life too. You're 'allowed' in that nobody can stop you, but doing so still makes you a bit of a knob.
leggo wrote: I'm sure if someone dissected your own physical appearance within an inch of its life for no particular reason, the fact that they were 'allowed' to do so would be little comfort to you.
leggo wrote: » . But you're basing all of your assumptions there, by your own admission, on one picture you saw of her at the HOF. You've literally zero idea of the motivation behind any work you think she has had done. So basically you've made up a story in your head to justify commenting on another person's physical appearance and are dressing it up as concern for their wellbeing without a shred of evidence.
Frank O. Pinion wrote: » Yeah? And? People are allowed to comment on those decisions.
The White Wolf wrote: » Yeah they are of course. But she's a young woman who is increasingly beginning to look like some of the horror shows twice her age in Hollywood desperately trying to hold onto their looks. It's sad to me that she thinks she has to do that. But she's not the only one either on their books that is at it. That is my bigger concern and makes me wonder what kind of atmosphere they are fostering.
riffmongous wrote: » The concern would be to what extent it's really their decision
leggo wrote: » Fandom is weird sometimes. Wrestlers are allowed make their own decisions on what to do with their own bodies.
leggo wrote: » Wrestlers are allowed make their own decisions on what to do with their own bodies.
The White Wolf wrote: » Just looking at some of the HoF pictures....for a supposed women's revolution I've never seen more plastic on display. What on earth is Charlotte playing at?
Itssoeasy wrote: » They did and I don’t know but Billie Kay and big E are potentially more than friends. Also is there anything cesaro isn’t good at ?
Lithium93_ wrote: » So they did something different on UpUpDownDown recently by going bowling.
gerrybbadd wrote: » What is the logic for running wwe network ads on... The wwe network?