GingerLily wrote: » You're the one assuming things from my post. Teenage boys CAN be sensitive? I didn't say he would be, I just advised the OP to be careful? I don't think your advice is constructive at all
Deleted User wrote: » and i only pointed out that having been a teenage lad meself, its not something that would have in any way bugged me. hardly an attack on anyone now.
yabadabado wrote: » OP how about you actually ask the lad if hed like to be involved and what role. When I was his age I'd have zero interest being involved with the crap that goes on regards nonstop table of a wedding.
Sorry about that wrote: » Except it’s not just “a wedding”. His Mam is committing to a man who’s not his Dad, for the rest of her life. Just because he might not show it, it’s going to be a huge deal for him. OP, please don’t casually ask him if he’d like to do something; it’s your job to have an important role chosen for him because he’s your son. No doubt the other people involved were asked properly. It’s only manners to do the same for him.
Pawwed Rig wrote: » He could be the ring bearer. We had my nephew do that as he was upset that he had no role. We talked up the importance of it and even trusted him to mind the rings the night before and bring them to the ceremony.
yabadabado wrote: » You nor I have no idea if its a huge deal for him.Ask him if he would like to be involved,no need to treat him like a baby,he's 15 not a 6 year old. Sit him down and have a proper conversation about it and see is he comfortable having a role to play or would he rather not.Why just choose an important role for him without actually asking him first,no one else would be treated like that. Show him you know he is mature enough to make his own decision.
Duffryman wrote: » A 15-year-old girl in such a situation may well be very disappointed if she doesn’t get a role of some sort. A 15-year-old boy may very well not care at all. Don’t think I’d have been pushed myself about all that sort of pomp and ceremony when I was that age either.
GarIT wrote: » If I was marrying someone that had a teenage+ kid of the same gender as me they would be best man or maid of honour. I wouldn't consider marrying someone if that wasn't the case for my daughter, she's MOH or there is no wedding. .
Pawwed Rig wrote: » Because all boys think the same? It could also be the case that he says he doesn't care but actually does. Offer him a role OP. If he wants to do it great. If not then great too.
GingerLily wrote: » Why jump down the throats of other advice though? Seems unnecessary? I agree the OP should ask her son, but I think being a groomsman should be his decision!
Deleted User wrote: » worth noting that the OP doesn't even really suggest theres a conflict here so mich as a budget constraint, so we're all just arguing a projected position!
Cedric Immense Injury wrote: » I would completely disagree. The best man should be the person who the groom wants it to be, this should imo be a life long friend or a brother etc. someone who knows them over the years and who can tell a few stories etc. Someone who has known them years and shared life experiences over the years etc. I see no reason to have a teenage boy as anything but a junior groomsman or a teenage girl as anything but a junior bridesmaid. Sure they can’t even go on the stag or hen, or organise the stag or hen etc so it’s totally over the top to “demand it” as you would. These sort of forced obligations are a terrible idea.
GarIT wrote: » As I said in my last paragraph, I wouldn't marry someone who didn't want it to be my child. As you say "Someone who knows them over the years...", for example a child who they would have lived with for a few years and that they would have been putting effort into having a step-parent/step-child relationship with. Things can sound very different when you say them differently. "a teenage boy" vs "the child who is becomoing my son on that day". I don't see why they can organise it, everything doesn't have to revolve around drink. I don't think it would ever come to demanding it, I wouldn't get that far with someone who wasn't putting significantly more effort into building a relationship with my child than they are with me.
NashD wrote: » Yes and No... absolutely I would never have dreamed of trying to veto any of my husbands choices - but if I had a son and he wasn't even considering him as a groomsman that would be a gamechanger for me. I think it sends a message of the role the groom sees the boy playing in his life.
tretorn wrote: » Groomsman is the grooms choice and its usually someone from his side of the family. Would you be happy if he wanted a daughter of his to be your bridesmaid.
Tombo2001 wrote: » Right - so if I am hearing you right; your message to OP is - bring it up with your husband to be, if he doesnt like it - then thats (in your opinion) a game changer. All bets are off. V helpful at this point in proceedings.....
Hi, Just to give an update. Our original wedding was cancelled 3 times (Covid) so we ended up doing a very small hotel ceromany and my son walked me up the isle and was my witness. He loved it and so did I. By the way, the smaller the better for a wedding, we felt like we had more fun on the day and a lot less stress!
Thanks for all the replies.