Agent_47 wrote: » Just remember, a voucher like Bikes4work up to the full value of €1,000 is not the same as €1,000 in cash. a number of bikeshops tell me they get charged 10% by Bikes4work when redeeming the voucher, so you are effectively losing €100 leverage in transactions over €1,000. You effectively have €900. I had hoped to get 10% off the bike but find I can only get 10% off the cash element above the voucher value.
CramCycle wrote: » Its a bug bare of mine as my current employer uses them, but they actually shunt all of the work they claim to save them back onto them and the employee. You are basically losing 10% of the value of your bike for absolutely no benefit whatsoever. I think it has also been pointed out if you were a pedant about the letter of the law, they are not a bike shop, and they are selling vouchers, so technically, they are facilitating fraud, albeit not against the spirit of the law.
JonnyMarbles wrote: » I don't understand? How do you lose 10% buying power with bike to work?
Fighting Tao wrote: » It’s the admin fee that the voucher company takes. So your company pays the voucher company €1000. You give the voucher to the bike shop. When the bike shop redeems it they only get €900.
JonnyMarbles wrote: » It's more like, the people buying without the bike to work need to get 10% off or else they're getting overcharged.
Mickiemcfist wrote: » Or people using cash get more for their 1000 than those who use B2W.
plodder wrote: » One thing to look out for with the likes of Halfords is they might run a sale promotion with a discount off many bikes. You go into the store and see the bike you want has the discount, but then when you actually try to buy it, they tell you the promotion doesn't apply with bikes4work vouchers. That happened to me and I already had the voucher organised with their name on it, so had to suck it up with the higher price. Wasn't a huge difference really, but it's worth checking details like this before you commit yourself.
Hurrache wrote: » I think it's more so the employer wanting the easiest solution so they outsource all the related work.
CramCycle wrote: » But there is the thing, its actually not less work for the accountant. For big firms, who have accountants, this should be a doddle. For the Civil and Public service, same thing. Small companies will have smaller staff numbers, so other than putting some restrictions, it should again be easier to do themselves. I've seen the paperwork they make you fill out for the voucher schemes, you essentially do all the work for them and they take 100quid for the privilege.
chillywilly wrote: » I’m a bit confused, hopefully someone can clarify. I recent got a bike through the scheme. The invoice was for €924 in total which my employee paid. I got my pay slip this month and it looks like €77 was deducted (I.e 924 over 12 months. Am I right in saying this is incorrect? Surely the deduction should include the tax saving or am I missing something?
C3PO wrote: » I know for sure that the company I work for would not offer CTW without the services of a "Voucher Company"! I think the point you are possibly missing is that in most larger companies the scheme will be run by HR rather than Finance and HR, certainly where I work, will always look for the easiest (for them) solution!
David6330 wrote: » I was wondering if I could just get the standard equipment such as panniers, helmet, cycling jacket etc. through the scheme? I already have a bike and not looking to upgrade it.
mirrormatrix wrote: » Unless you found someone to do some pretty creative invoicing for you
CramCycle wrote: » The funny thing is though, it is, as far as I can tell, not easier, in fact, its possibly more work through the voucher company but like all great Snake oil salesman, they make you think its easier, its certainly alot more work for HR from what I can see.
D13exile wrote: » Bought my current bike (Trek Domane with Tiagra groupset) under the BTW scheme in September 2014. While I've kept my bike in good nick, it has done considerable mileage and I'd like to upgrade to a better groupset and possible disc brakes. Am I eligible now to get another bike under BTW or do I have to wait until September this year?
LollipopJimmy wrote: » It's for accounting purposes as far as I can see - one4all or whoever would be set up as a vendor. It's a load of pox because the bike shop loose a fortune