nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours 2019

dfx-

Continuing on from here:

https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=109615422#post109615422

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

8-10

TitianGerm wrote: »

So anyone guess the team tonight?

I'm thinking it'll be the usual back 5. Then Fabby and Lalana in the middle (not sure who the third will be but most likely Henderson). And then the usual three up front.

What I'd like to see is maybe Fabby and Gini deep with Mane, Bobby, original in front and the Mo up top.

I think Lovren, Lallana and Fabinho come in for Matip, Henderson and Milner

The White Wolf

Harry Palmr wrote: »

.

Their hate is a good thing - it means we're back.

Anyone recall the Liverpool relegation party Facebook pages and the heartfelt comments of not wanting us to end like Leeds and that it won't be the same without us?

Yeah, I'll take the fume and hate and outrage all day every day.

Harry Palmr

I hate this lot so much it’s a joke , I’m living in Kent a lot of my mates are glory hunting Rags , but they have actually become tolerable compared to this lot!

martyos121

charolais0153 wrote:

Friday night footnall. Didn't even realise. Lovely start to the weekend

Unless we lose. Then it's just two extra days of misery.

charolais0153

Friday night footnall. Didn't even realise. Lovely start to the weekend

Gbear

We've Porto, Chelsea, Porto coming up over the next couple of weeks, so I think we might see a small shuffle tonight up front/attacking mid, and Henderson held back for those games.

I'd imagine at least one of Origi, Lallana, Shaqiri or Keita will start. I think they're all fit again.
Southampton's attack is one of the poorest in the league, but their defence is in and around most of the other mid table sides and a lot better than the worst defences in the league, so I really would like to see a bit of initiative shown in our selection.

I'd imagine Gomez won't start but he might get some game time later on if we're either in a comfortable position, or looking to bring on an extra defender to see the game out.

TitianGerm

Crash Bang Wall wrote: »

I suspect Milner wont play, as he will be LB on Tuesday.
.

That's why I left Milner out.

Crash Bang Wall

I suspect Milner wont play, as he will be LB on Tuesday.

I suspect Fab Lallana and either Henderson or Gini in MF.

Usual back 5 and front three.

Fitz*

I think Fabinho is nailed on as the holder tonight. Then it's between Henderson or Gini for the middle spot and then Lallana or Milner for the attacking slot tonight. Keita more than likely won't start and Shaqiri won't see game time either.

The Milner / Lallana spot I do think actually will be more attacking tonight too, and not reserved like the Spurs game - think more like Watford at home where Milner was really high

Gonna Say Fabinho / Gini / Lallana myself.

yourdeadwright

BullBlackNova wrote: »

I'd go with that - Fab, Hendo and Lallana in the middle and the rest as usual.

Would love Gomez and Ox on the bench but I won't be too greedy.

I have half a nagging feeling that Origi will start. Based on absolutely nothing.

Id go with the same team you have,

BullBlackNova

TitianGerm wrote: »

So anyone guess the team tonight?

I'm thinking it'll be the usual back 5. Then Fabby and Lalana in the middle (not sure who the third will be but most likely Henderson). And then the usual three up front.

What I'd like to see is maybe Fabby and Gini deep with Mane, Bobby, original in front and the Mo up top.

I'd go with that - Fab, Hendo and Lallana in the middle and the rest as usual.

Would love Gomez and Ox on the bench but I won't be too greedy.

I have half a nagging feeling that Origi will start. Based on absolutely nothing.

TitianGerm

So anyone guess the team tonight?

I'm thinking it'll be the usual back 5. Then Fabby and Lalana in the middle (not sure who the third will be but most likely Henderson). And then the usual three up front.

What I'd like to see is maybe Fabby and Gini deep with Mane, Bobby, original in front and the Mo up top.

[Deleted User]

Charlie19 wrote: »

Yes but the original point was about seeing so many balls of the same colour dropping in a row. The way I was caught was something like 9 or 10 so I then start increasing by bet each spin, thinking that the opposite colour was bound to fall and after nearly 20 spins I was cleared out.

..........

If the bolded piece was actual fact then there wouldn't be a casino in the world as they'd go bust after a few hours

yourdeadwright

Muahahaha wrote: »

Didn't know that Ralph Hassenhuttel and Klopp did their UEFA coaching badges together, they go back years. Very similar footballing philosophies too so I'm expecting an open game tonight.

I gotta say I really like Ralph ,
I think with a half decent summer the Saints will push top 10 with him ,

Muahahaha

Didn't know that Ralph Hassenhuttel and Klopp did their UEFA coaching badges together, they go back years. Very similar footballing philosophies too so I'm expecting an open game tonight.

radiata

ballyargus wrote: »

you're betting on five distinct instances. For all five to occur correctly is the same as an accumulator. Any individual instance is 18/37

Who gives a fcuk, back to soccer

ballyargus

ShamoBuc wrote: »

No, same odds.
18 red slots, 18 black slots, 1 green( 2 green in the States)
Odds of it being red are 18/37.
Odd of it being black are 18/37
It doesn't matter if it lands Red or Black, the next spin will gave the exact same odds, each and every time.

you're betting on five distinct instances. For all five to occur correctly is the same as an accumulator. Any individual instance is 18/37

Agent Coulson

Gomez is fit to return to the game tonight.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2019/04/04/jurgen-klopp-delights-diverse-personalities-liverpools-record/

Agent Coulson

~Rebel~ wrote: »

Not quite bad I think, but he missed games a bit on and off earlier in the season, and then missed the bones of 2 months recently. Came back in their last game I think though. I presume he can't play against us though, since it's technically a one-year loan before they're obligated to buy at season's end, right?

Ye pretty sure he can't play against us because of the loan deal.

The lad really can't catch a break with injures.

~Rebel~

Agent Coulson wrote: »

What happened Ings after his great start to the season?

Did he get another bad injury?

Not quite bad I think, but he missed games a bit on and off earlier in the season, and then missed the bones of 2 months recently. Came back in their last game I think though. I presume he can't play against us though, since it's technically a one-year loan before they're obligated to buy at season's end, right?

Agent Coulson

What happened Ings after his great start to the season?

Did he get another bad injury?

~Rebel~

Back to the football, and i'm honestly worried about tomorrow. Still not terribly confident in our away form, and Southampton have taken points off Chelsea, Arsenal, Man Utd, Spurs already this season, mostly of those while at home.

We should win of course, but between their home form, and our away form, it's not a given. I'll feel a lot better about things if we can get this one in the bag.

~Rebel~

Charlie19 wrote: »

Yes but the original point was about seeing so many balls of the same colour dropping in a row. The way I was caught was something like 9 or 10 so I then start increasing by bet each spin, thinking that the opposite colour was bound to fall and after nearly 20 spins I was cleared out.

Think I'll just stay well clear of any roulette tables.

ha, yeah, that's the logical fallacy of it all. It just feels like it should be more likely for the next one to be a different colour after a run of results - but in actuality, it's still always equal odds every spin for it to be either colour, regardless of sequence.

Charlie19

Yes but the original point was about seeing so many balls of the same colour dropping in a row. The way I was caught was something like 9 or 10 so I then start increasing by bet each spin, thinking that the opposite colour was bound to fall and after nearly 20 spins I was cleared out.

Think I'll just stay well clear of any roulette tables.

ShamoBuc

Charlie19 wrote: »

I don't get this, obviously the chances of hitting even 5 reds in row is lower than hitting 4 reds and 1 black.

No, same odds.
18 red slots, 18 black slots, 1 green( 2 green in the States)
Odds of it being red are 18/37.
Odd of it being black are 18/37
It doesn't matter if it lands Red or Black, the next spin will gave the exact same odds, each and every time.

~Rebel~

Charlie19 wrote: »

Is that because the odds are based only on a single spin of the wheel?

I don't get this, obviously the chances of hitting even 5 reds in row is lower than hitting 4 reds and 1 black.

Not if you're actually picking which 4 reds and 1 black.

Predicting RRRRR is exactly the same odds as predicting RRBRR.

Each selection is always 50/50 (ignoring the 'house' plate for simplicity), and the wheel has no memory. So on the 5th, or 10th, or millionth spin it's totally irrelevent what sequence came before, it's still always 50/50 for each selection.

Charlie19

5starpool wrote: »

The odds of any exact sequence of a particular length is the same as the odds of another different exact sequence of the sane length.

One might look more plausible than the other, but the odds are the same.

Is that because the odds are based only on a single spin of the wheel?

I don't get this, obviously the chances of hitting even 5 reds in row is lower than hitting 4 reds and 1 black.

~Rebel~

Charlie19 wrote: »

How could the odds be the exact same?

Because the odds on every single spin are exactly the same. So if you're predicting any sequence at all, beit BBBBB or BRBRB, the maths are the same. For every unique spin, it's utterly irrelevant to the odds whether the previous spin was an R or a B. The odds get higher based on the number of predictions you're making rather than what the sequence itself is.

Charlie19

Isaiah Slimy Canvas wrote: »

Lovren needs to teach Salah some shooting skills after watching that video!

Why?

You're not hitting the target when the ball strikes the bar:D

5starpool

Charlie19 wrote: »

How could the odds be the exact same?

The odds of any exact sequence of a particular length is the same as the odds of another different exact sequence of the sane length.

One might look more plausible than the other, but the odds are the same.