ohnonotgmail wrote: » Funny the number of low post count recent joiners that support gemma
Joeytheparrot wrote: » O'Doherty harassed and bullied O'Leary
batgoat wrote: » She really is an autism advocate, she exposed a group that were effectively poisoning children with bleach. Gemma is well aware of the fact that she has plenty of followers who will do some pretty questionable harassment of Fiona. Your love for all things Gemma and making Fiona out to be the bad person is pretty cringe.
skepticalme wrote: » No she's not an autism advocate. She is obsessed with MMS and thinks any parent of an autistic child doing anything to help them is on a par with MMS. She is against any help for autistic people. I don't care what you think. Fiona is known as someone to avoid apart from her idiot followers.
GinAndBitter wrote: » The both of them are absolute crazies, have a look at O'Learys Twitter from today, that's not the behaviour of a normal human being. The two of them should be disappeared.
gman2k wrote: » Any day a meeting of fascists is cancelled due to pressure from normal decent people is a good day.This argument about free speech is bollocks. Fcuk Fascists.
batgoat wrote: » Just did a quick google on 'Dr Suzanne Humphries', ah so she's one of the loons who claims vaccine cause autism. She also seems to advocate vitamin c as some bizarre treatment of autism.... But Fiona is the one with the problem...
Patty Hearst wrote: » Why would you say that about O'Doherty? I don't agree with her on a number of issues but calling her 'Absolute Crazy' is a bit far?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Not a freedom of speech issue. A venue just doesnt want her business.
skepticalme wrote: » Coolera House is being bombarded with tweets from the same few people as Cork meetings. They took down their facebook page before it was announced. Probably were warned about the reviews from this lot that would be posted on their page, like Imperial and Maritime in Cork.
Gemmented O’Dotty
Patty Hearst wrote: » This is absolute Bullsh1t and you know it. The business have been inundated with threats to slander them online (trip advisor), boycott, threats to ruin their business. The 'progressive' Brownshirts
batgoat wrote: » Gemma hasn't stated anything that isn't based in conspiracies for about a year at this stage.... She's a complete loon who spreads propaganda.
batgoat wrote: » One is entitled to give poor reviews, to boycott and this is all exercising freedom of speech. In general, I think people are calling them and saying that they're incredibly to disappointed to hear that the venue is hosting an anti-semetic,racist conspiracy theorist.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Widespread corruption in Govt...she is correct Mass Immigration and the detrimental effects it will have on society...she is correct. Pushing of Gender identity nonsense on Children...she is correct. Proposing to teach about pornography to primary school children...she is correct. Govt pandering to ISIS members and neglecting their duty to protect the citizens in Ireland...she is correct. Corrupt, fake news govt shill media...absolutely correct. Absolute Worthlessness and indeed the foot soldiers of hyper capitalism People Before Profit...she is correct
batgoat wrote: » One is entitled to give poor reviews,.
blackwhite wrote: » It’s a rural pub whose entire business is based of their immediate locality for regulars and for events. Visitors are a tiny element of business for them. I don’t think I’ve ever set foot in the place and not known every person in there. If you think Michael Woods gives two flying f*cks about trip advisor then you clearly haven’t a clue about the place. Gemma targets venues like this where she hopes the proprietor won’t be aware of the sort of lowlife scum that are attracted to Gemma like flies to sh*te. Once the owners are made aware of what sort of people Gemma is going to attract then they choose not to take her business.
Maurice Yeltsin wrote: » People are entitled to leave bad reviews of a business they've never used? I suppose since the commies who oppose Gemma think that a business built on a lifetime of hard graft and self sacrifice should be seized by the state, that this vile opinion isn't too surprising.
Patty Hearst wrote: » He clearly said on twitter (before the bombardment) that he knew about ACI and Gemma and did not agree with everything she said but believed in Free Speech. But The 21st Century Brownshirts put an end to that.
batgoat wrote: » Gonna respond in numbered order... 1. Generally relates them to conspiracies so actual relevant points disappear 2. Her mass migration crap, the majority of the time relies on propaganda by far right groups/outlets. 3. She's a bit of a transphobe, as are you. Shocker. 4. Her porn crap was trying to create hysteria. Another shocker 5. This is a matter of opinion again. 6. 99% around fake news conspiracies 7. Nonsense, not a fan of people before profit but I haven't seen her highlight anything of note. So it's more like she's validating your existing opinions and how she's going about it, simply does not matter to you.
blackwhite wrote: » I know Michael personally. He wasn’t aware of half the evil sh1te Gemma and her nasty band of acolytes were espousing. When made aware of the sort of scum that follows & supports her he didn’t want that sort of person coming in (and possibly seeing it as a place to revisit again)
Patty Hearst wrote: » The existing opinions of an exponentially increasing amount of people all over Europe as you will find out soon.
batgoat wrote: » I actually do think it's okay to specify in a review that you have an issue with the people that they allow to host in their venue. You haven't illustrated anything that isn't respecting freedom of speech as it's literally using it. Don't even know what the second paragraph relates to. So just an insane rant or what? It's perfectly possible that they simply concluded that it's bad press and not the type of group you wish to associate with. Get over it Patty.
Patty Hearst wrote: » 'Made aware' of what? made aware of the highly biased opinions of (Brownshirt) people who think anyone to the left of them is a Nazi. Anyway I hope Gemma continues to book hotels because ultimately the business owners of Ireland will start to wonder if they should be bullied into submission by a group of raggedy arsed miscreants.
Jackman25 wrote: » Nasty and unnecessary thing to do to a rural business.
batgoat wrote: » People can have ****ty views, does not make Gemma any less of a loon or make your own views any more legitimate. In reality the number of people who Gemma actually appeals to in Ireland is relatively small.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wf.vanillicon.com/v2/f07ee44b0b39bbb635066da4046d9475.svg)
