Ramona Shrilling Matchmaking wrote: » It could have been a thread about PT Barnum's three favourite colours, sunglasses indoors, how do you pronounce Swarovski, what do you reckon cows think of horses, adult braces, flat earthers, are skinny jeans a scam, Mayo's curse, boats are mad aren't they lads, and it still wouldn't have made it past 48 hours before turning out the same, to be fair.
Paulie Tortell wrote: » Wow you seem to love insulting people.
Allinall wrote: » Any evidence to support that?
Mad_maxx wrote: » Are feminists looking to radically reform this aspect of family law so as to take a more even attitude towards asset division and care of children? Whatever about what may have motivated those who wrote the laws which today's courts draw from, the reality based on them is surprisingly favourable for feminists Happy accident I guess
Sunny Disposition wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npueY7QpxF0 Now for ye. No one wants to be single.
Charles Ingles wrote: » I've been perfectly respectfull throughout this conversation
kunst nugget wrote: » I believe he originally said 'the social acumen of autistic chimpanzees' How is that offensive to you or your (possibly fictional) autistic family members? Are they also chimpanzees or are you just looking for any possible way to be offended?
Mad_maxx wrote: » Thanks for proving my earlier point
Charles Ingles wrote: » We should be able to have a discussion and even disagree without calling names or being insulted
Mad_maxx wrote: » Also have an autistic sibling
....... wrote: » boo hoo - having to resort to personal insults because you have no valid points to make. oh de wimmins, de wimmins are suppressing me!!
Charles Ingles wrote: » Well you have no right to insult me. I've been perfectly respectfull throughout this conversation I haven't called anybody names or personally insulted them. I have an autistic family member and don't find it amusing to mock their disability
Mad_maxx wrote: » It's what gormless bores ( posing as wise intellectuals) do
Berserker wrote: » What do you mean by a tad restrictive?
Ramona Shrilling Matchmaking wrote: » it still wouldn't have made it past 48 hours before turning out the same, to be fair.
Charles Ingles wrote: » ...I have an autistic family member and don't find it amusing to mock their disability
jimgoose wrote: » I'm not mocking autism, I'm mocking you! :pac:
Charles Ingles wrote: » Nice mocking autism, do you really have to do that to make your point
Stacksofwacks wrote: » I think porn has changed the landscape aswell. I remember not longer than 20 years ago if you a bit of leg or an arm you'd be ready to come in your pants, nowadays you have kids watching hardcore bondage for hours on end and barely a flicker in their knickers..something unhealthy about that
[Deleted User] wrote: » I wonder did anyone - especially the OP who is not just a smart guy but a MOD of the forum of some experience - expect anything else? The moment I read the OP I knew pretty much instantly the thread would be a Men V. Women Crapfest. Only thing that surprised me is it did not happen _faster_ than it actually did
jimgoose wrote: » Another one nobbled by the sweaty neckbeards with the social acumen of an autistic chimpanzee, wondering why girls cross the road when they see them. :pac::pac::pac:
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » I think one of the benefits of having grown up in the 80s was that we didn’t spend almost all our time indoors staring at a computer screen. I can’t help but feel that there is now a generation of overweight young men who lack both the social and hygiene skills to attract a partner and somehow this is the girl’s fault.
kunst nugget wrote: » Thread starts: 'Golly gosh, I didn't expect it to happen to me in my thirties but I think I rather enjoy the single life.' Sixteen hours later: 'FEEEEEMINISTS!!! AAARRRRGHHH!'
Dial Hard wrote: » Are you seriously suggesting that the Irish government, legislature & judiciary haven't been pretty much entirely made up of men for the entire history of this state? Seriously???