Mad_maxx wrote: » I forgot that stating facts constitutes " hate" these days.
Tucker Hot Bell wrote: » You're talking about it as if it's late 30s/40s - are you very young?
ArchXStanton wrote: » I get more more pleasure out of a good book or fishing than I ever did in any relationship...when I think back at all the little hoops I had to jump through, pissy moods, women with the morals of an alley cat.. it nearly puts years on me
Tucker Hot Bell wrote: » You "have to" agree with that woman hater because of ONE woman you know?! I know several very happy, attractive, easy-going, well adjusted women over 30 also, but no - let's just view women negatively here. Again.
....... wrote: » I see the "blame women on my own bad choices" brigade are out in force!
Tucker Hot Bell wrote: » I know what he means (and I'm sorry to read of your situation which is horrible; I do hate that there are women like that - on a selfish level they really bloody well let the side down) but it's the phrasing - "men are better off single" as if every woman is potentially out to ruin him. Radical feminists shouldn't say men are all potential rapists - and broad strokes shouldn't be acceptable in relation to women either. As if there is no man happy in his relationship. And as if there are no relationships where the woman is the one treated badly.
Deebles McBeebles wrote: » What about single men? Have you found this with them too or is it just women?
Mad_maxx wrote: » I've a son and a daughter, genuinely hope my son is gay as the state is openly prejudiced against straight men and its a celebration according to many
[Deleted User] wrote: » I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
Mad_maxx wrote: » The quarell is with the state, got nothing to do with broad brush generalisations, reality is though that any woman can chose to cripple a male partner financially and will be celebrated for it
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » I certainly enjoyed being single during my 20’s. I would have had a couple of what I would have called long term relationships during that period. Was great to “put it about” and all that but when the time came I felt that it was about time to settle down. Of course by then I was in my 30s and knew that I’d have to be smart. I didn’t want to be pressured into marriage and kids after a year or two so I went for a partner who wasn’t around my own age so as to buy myself some time
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » Spending less time playing World of Warcraft or whatever and more time working on your appearance and dress would give your chances of actually getting somewhere in life.
Berserker wrote: » I know a few and they've great lives. They are the type of people who don't take life too serious, work 9-5 and spend the rest of their time travelling, going to fitness classes etc. Really nice people. Women who focus on their careers and hit a brick wall in their thirties when they realise that they want to have a relationship and family are a different kettle of fish. They tend to be intense people by nature, who want it all now and most men are going to steer clear of that. One of my OH's friends falls into this category. Late thirties now and she's set herself the goal of finding a husband and having kids by the age of 40. She started dating, kicking guys to the curb for silly reasons and the supply chain has dried up now. She a right pain to be round.
....... wrote: » No. Can you give some examples as to how exactly it does? If a man and a woman are married with no children and break up they come out equally. If a man and a woman are married with children and they break up then it is decided who is going to be the main carer for the children with the other person being awarded access or shared custody etc... Maintenance is also agreed. Usually the woman ends up with custody (but not always), but whoever does then also stays in the family home - which makes sense for the children. Is this what you perceive as the state siding with the woman?
Paulie Tortell wrote: » What does getting somewhere in life mean? We all die in the end so people should do what they enjoy doing.
Mad_maxx wrote: » Just wanted clarification as to your earlier post, I'm fully clear now, thanks
Charles Ingles wrote: » Happens a lot , seen it lots of time feminism
Tucker Hot Bell wrote: » Saying men are better off single, yes - it's a bit woman hating because it implies all women are potentially out to ruin men.
Mad_maxx wrote: » That's your interpretation, my quarell is with the laws of the land but the law as it stands discriminates against men in the event of break-up
Dial Hard wrote: » When my marriage ended (at his behest, I might point out) I walked away and left my ex with the house, the contents, the dogs and his extremely lucrative army pension. Whoooo, me and the state really screwed him sideways there, didn't we???! Genuine question: have you ever actually been through a divorce?
TomasMacR wrote: » well that was stupid.
Mad_maxx wrote: » So you made a choice, I didn't say that the state forces women to get all that they can but it's there if they wish and the state will facilitate
ancapailldorcha wrote: » So, I'm a little into my thirties now and still single. What I didn't expect was to actually be enjoying it. I'm able to pretty much do as I please. I can pursue my own interests, travel when and where I want and do sod all when I want. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't say no to meeting someone but I figure I should try and enjoy single life while it lasts.
Dial Hard wrote: » Yes, I did make a choice but you are posting as if the State is forcibly stripping men of their financial assets regardless of circumstance, nuance or the wishes of either party when that is quite simply not the case and never has been.