marno21 wrote: » The idea in Ireland of building a proper public transport system and then utilising the surrounding land for appropriately dense residential developments still seems to be far outside the box of thought.
[Deleted User] wrote: » At least they usually have some kind of road infrastructure, no ideal but present. Glanmire doesn't even have capacity to put in a road.
Markcheese wrote: » Most of Glanmire is very close to dunkettle, and there's just about space to put in a public transport corridor to there.. If the will was there, now as to how you'd go from there... Any chance a tram or Brt could share the same space as heavy rail, and continue on into the city?
[Deleted User] wrote: » How would you fit that, without disrupting the road to Mayfield. You can't treat it as if Dunkettle is the only destination. Glanmire shouldn't be a development heavy area
Markcheese wrote: » Well, yes your right, glanmire shouldn't have been developed the way it has been, but it is what it is. Dunkettle isn't a destination, it's a potential link... What do you suggest?
Deleted User wrote: » https://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/tenants-facing-eviction-from-tallaght-complex-take-case-to-rtb-1.3841496?mode=amp&fbclid=IwAR3Tn_k2u93M1CuL39VLFzi3xJpJFTCOMfviXHU5-NzQDC0Q_usliHn0MNM To change tack a second. This is exactly why we have a resistance to renting (aparments especially), in this country. There is no security of home. Cork will face similar without strict laws about tenure and long term letting. Edit: I'm actually really concerned about the retired homeless crisis, which is coming. Given the complete lack of social housing (thanks FG) and lax laws, what are the hundreds of thousands of people going to do, in the private rental sector, once they retire?
kub wrote: » I would be thanking FF more if i were you, when the boom was on the provision of social housing developments dried up.
Deleted User wrote: » Stop putting more there! With the slips going in, it will help dunkettle traffic and relieve Glanmire. Adding more development will be insane though
hans aus dtschl wrote: » I'm not sure we can get away with stopping development of Glanmire now. The best to hope for is an increase in density and an end to the sprawl. Are you talking about the Silversprings slip roads? The works here have been some of the worst I've seen in a long time. Westbound- 80kmh for mainline traffic. The design is effectively "first stop vulnerable users and then make them dash across the slip road". A fully segregated route could/should have just gone under the ramp here. Otherwise just signalise it at the bottom of the ramp. It's a death trap right now. Eastbound- Worse. No provision of any kind whatsoever for vulnerable road users. The design is "motorised traffic only". People are expected to dash across the ramps on this side without even a zebra crossing. If you're talking about the Dunkettle interchange, the new design will likely send more northside traffic via Glanmire unfortunately. The upgraded junction sees the Dublin-Cork traffic travelling vis the little Island Interchange. Which, since it's gridlocked every morning, I would expect people to avoid.
Shedite27 wrote: » I reckon there's something incorrect in pretty much every sentence. The Westbound silversprings is 60km Bottom of the ramp (from Mayfield going west) now has it's own lane so there's no merging to be done anymore. Eastbound now has bike lanes. There's nothing on that side of the road that needs a footpath. The new Dunkettle layout will be quicker to get through (Dublin-Cork direction) as it cuts out the big roundabout, not a hope anyone will go through Glanmire.
timmyjimmy wrote: » There are no bike lanes going east bound. 4 of us cycled along here last Saturday and it is really unclear where a cyclist is supposed to go. It may be the case that a bike lane will be put be put down but it in it's current state, it's an accident waiting to happen.
hans aus dtschl wrote: » It's been increased from 60kmh to 80kmh in the last review, Q3 2018. The 60kmh limit begins under the overpass. There are no lanes or crossings whatsoever Eastbound. Vulnerable users have to cross the ramp. The new Dunkettle layout will be no quicker for anyone going from (for instance) Watergrasshill to Mayfield or Fermoy to Apple. They'll have a choice between an approx. 3km detour through the Little Island traffic and a dumbell interchange or taking the slip road at Watergrasshill or Sarsfield's Court, both of which are shorter and faster for them. Edit: Look, maybe you just didn't read my post correctly, but if you're going to accuse me of being incorrect, please be specific and accurate. What you were saying about the speed limits WAS correct until recently, but there have been changes. See drawings sheets 48 and 49 here, unfortunately I don't have the as-built:http://speedlimits.ie/data/documents/Cork-City-Road-Traffic-Special-Speed-Limits-Maps.pdf
Shedite27 wrote: » Had to look on the way home tonight to make sure I wasn't going mad. The bike lane ends about 50m before the junction and goes up onto the footpath. )
Shedite27 wrote: » Had to look on the way home tonight to make sure I wasn't going mad. The bike lane ends about 50m before the junction and goes up onto the footpath. Again, had a look this evening, the 60km starts after the junction, if all going at the speed limits, I find it very manageable junction these days (far better than before with the merging) I really don't think anyone is going to go through Riverstown and Mayfield rather than going the normal route. The worst part about that journey currently is getting onto the Tunnel roundabout, that'll be skipped now and the cork-bound traffinc moved to 150m left. It's a new junction they're building to turn around at, not the current little island junction. I assume with the plans for Tivoli Docks, the Tivoli flyover will have to have a fairly substancial upgrade, hopefully they'll do it right whenever they do that (access roads will have to be one of the first things they do)
timmyjimmy wrote: » Which junction are we talking about? I drive past here everyday and cycle occasionally. As far as i'm aware, there are no cycling lanes going eastbound. There is a new cycling lane going westbound which starts on the road, mounts the footpath and then comes up to new zebra crossing on the road up to Mayfield.
Shedite27 wrote: » Sorry, mixing up my eastbound and westbound
Markcheese wrote: » A lot of the time, (especially coming up to junctions,like the tivoli east bound ), it'd be better for vehicle speeds to be restricted, and lanes to be wider, so the bikes can get in lane too. The bike lanes that end in a pedestrian crossing, or pass through a busy bus stop are just daft, and arent going to get used by regular commuter cyclists..
hans aus dtschl wrote: » It finally all makes sense! So you're saying it's not so bad now Westbound: OK, it's definitely better for some vulnerable users (pedestrians). But worse for some (anyone moving at cycling pace): It's more dangerous now to continue straight-on because the new alignment has a higher limit and they now need to get into the "overtaking" lane on the dual carriageway. Otherwise, using the new cycleway, they have to stop to wait for a gap in traffic, then cross a painted road with a gradient and two sets of "blind bumps" (tactile pavement). Which, in cleats for instance, would be a nightmare and they'd be well advised to avoid. Neither is ideal. Eastbound, I think you can now see what we're saying: simply more dangerous for vulnerable users than before. No upside whatsoever here.
timmyjimmy wrote: » For the life of me, I can't figure why they are encouraging people to cycle into the city and make it more dangerous for people leaving the city.
timmyjimmy wrote: » It really is some low hanging fruit to alleviate some of the traffic problems in Little Island.