nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Gameweek 32 Free Hit Thread

ThunbergsAreGo

Worked well for 31, and with many playing it this week I thought a standalone thread would be good to avoid clogging up the Transfers Thread

First Draft

Ederson - (Hamer)

Tomkins, Lindelof, Valery (Benderek) (Doherty)

Pogba, Hazard, Sterling, Ward Prowse (McNeil)

Batshuayi, Aguero, Kane

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Trimm Trabb

I wanted Zaha and Rashford but was going with SGW Valery as my only sub.

Now I’m thinking of going Batshuayi over Zaha and keeping AWB as bench cover. Annoying though as I’d prefer Zaha over Batman.

ThunbergsAreGo

Getting rid of Kane changes the whole team

Option A

Kepa

Schlupp Azpi Lindelof Dunk Laporte

Sterling Hazard Pogba

Kane Aguero

Option B

Kepa

Schlupp Lindelof Laporte

Sterling Hazard Pogba Alli

Rashford Aguero Jiminez

I think I prefer A but it's feels a bit safe for a DGW

Paully D

I know they operate within a lower budget, but I’m not a fan at all of the FF Scout picks this week.

https://twitter.com/ffscout/status/1111698646070947845?s=21

KevIRL

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/manchester-united-team-news-watford-16051212.amp?__twitter_impression=true

Lindelof not named by MEN here as being in the squad

km79

Martial and Rashford checked in at the Lowry
But
So
Did
Lukaku

Agagahaghahahahahahahaha

http://twitter.com/samuelluckhurst/status/1111730459338330114

extra gravy

Took Kane out and put Rashford back in...

Kepa
Young Schlupp Azpi
D. Silva Sterling Hazard Pogba
Aguero Rashford Batshuayi

Three City attackers or two plus a defender is what it's boiling down to now. Not sure I want double Chelsea defence either.

km79

KevIRL wrote: »

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/manchester-united-team-news-watford-16051212.amp?__twitter_impression=true

Lindelof not named by MEN here as being in the squad

Never even spotted that !

normanoffside

KevIRL wrote: »

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/manchester-united-team-news-watford-16051212.amp?__twitter_impression=true

Lindelof not named by MEN here as being in the squad

Just when I thought I had my WC team!!!

I might go PVA :pac:

extra gravy

Fecksake, tempted to go with neither of Rashford nor Lukaku at this stage.

How Soon Is Now

KevIRL wrote: »

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/manchester-united-team-news-watford-16051212.amp?__twitter_impression=true

Lindelof not named by MEN here as being in the squad

They mention he could join separately though which seems likely.

km79

extra gravy wrote: »

Fecksake, tempted to go with neither of Rashford nor Lukaku at this stage.

Indeed
So do I now tear it all up and go back to feckin Kane !!!!!!!

extra gravy

km79 wrote: »

Indeed
So do I now tear it all up and go back to feckin Kane !!!!!!!

I'm wondering the same... I've exactly enough for this 4-3-3:

Kepa
Laporte Smalling Schlupp Duffy
Sterling Hazard Pogba
Aguero Kane Batshuayi

I don't hate it...

It's getting difficult now with all the permutations and potential price rises tonight...can't fit everyone in that I might decide I want tomorrow morning

ThunbergsAreGo

extra gravy wrote: »

I'm wondering the same... I've exactly enough for this 4-3-3:

Kepa
Laporte Smalling Schlupp Duffy
Sterling Hazard Pogba
Aguero Kane Batshuayi

I don't hate it...

It's getting difficult now with all the permutations and potential price rises tonight...can't fit everyone in that I might decide I want tomorrow morning

This Free Hit is awful. We will have tried so many permutations we are bound to be disappointed

km79

naughtb4 wrote: »

This Free Hit is awful. We will have tried so many permutations we are bound to be disappointed

The worst thing is that we are limited to very few teams so a lotof 50:50 calls for those teams . And when we change one player from one team it usually means changing another from the other teams. So if one or 2 of those calls go the other way it will be rage time

extra gravy

naughtb4 wrote: »

This Free Hit is awful. We will have tried so many permutations we are bound to be disappointed

I read this quickly and thought you meant the team was awful...i was ready to fire the laptop out the window! Time to take a break :pac:

km79

extra gravy wrote: »

I'm wondering the same... I've exactly enough for this 4-3-3:

Kepa
Laporte Smalling Schlupp Duffy
Sterling Hazard Pogba
Aguero Kane Batshuayi

I don't hate it...

It's getting difficult now with all the permutations and potential price rises tonight...can't fit everyone in that I might decide I want tomorrow morning

I put him back in and it means a ridiculous amount of downgrades everywhere else
After changing other striker to quaner , having stephens as 5th mid along with two 3.8 defenders i was STILL 2.2ml in the red. That brought home just how much of a drain it would be bringing him back in..........

ThunbergsAreGo

km79 wrote: »

I put him back in and it means a ridiculous amount of downgrades everywhere else
After changing other striker to quaner , having stephens as 5th mid along with two 3.8 defenders i was STILL 2.2ml in the red. That brought home just how much of a drain it would be bringing him back in..........

Kane means going 5 at the back I think

ThunbergsAreGo

extra gravy wrote: »

I read this quickly and thought you meant the team was awful...i was ready to fire the laptop out the window! Time to take a break :pac:

Haha not at all. I actually checked could I do it when I read it. I really like your team not 100% on Bats though.

Raging I transferred Jimi out when tinkering

km79

naughtb4 wrote: »

Kane means going 5 at the back I think

I can get the exact same 433 team as extragravy with him
I prefer the 343 team i have without him
But Rashford..........

ThunbergsAreGo

km79 wrote: »

I can get the exact same 433 team as extragravy with him
I prefer the 343 team i have without him
But Rashford..........

I will back Azpi to outscore Bats I think.

Some great teams in here, and not along the usual group think some forums can bring.

And yeah I really want Kane AND Rashford

km79

naughtb4 wrote: »

.

Raging I transferred Jimi out when tinkering

Honestly think he may well now still be the best option in that price range
Considering having him and Batman instead of Rashford
Would leave me with 1.3 ITB which feels wrong though
Could always use it to upgrade schlupp to young I suppose but I don't even know if that is an upgrade bar in price!

IrishLad90

I can't let Mane go !!
I need the extra £££ for Kane
But he's gonna stay

ThunbergsAreGo

km79 wrote: »

Honestly think he may well now still be the best option in that price range
Considering having him and Batman instead of Rashford
Would leave me with 1.3 ITB which feels wrong though
Could always use it to upgrade schlupp to young I suppose but I don't even know if that is an upgrade bar in price!

100% agree with that, and as a bonus he is in my main ML rivals team. Though Kane is Kane no matter the game he will play and he is more likely to score than not. He has been out injured and has still outscored Jimi over the season

Chesty08

km79 wrote: »

Rashford is dropping fast and the other 2 are rising
Better stick them both in overnight while I decide

Can you lose Value on free hit??

km79

naughtb4 wrote: »

This Free Hit is awful. We will have tried so many permutations we are bound to be disappointed

It has helped me forget I have Diop and Perreira coming back into my team next week though
It has been nice not having to look at them for 2 weeks

extra gravy

naughtb4 wrote: »

Haha not at all. I actually checked could I do it when I read it. I really like your team not 100% on Bats though.

Raging I transferred Jimi out when tinkering

You could be right re Jimi, I haven't sold him yet so could have him instead of Bats. Plus he'll be in a lot of FH teams too.

Wilberto

Chesty08 wrote: »

Can you lose Value on free hit??

Your original team can lose value on a free hit, yes.

km79

extra gravy wrote: »

You could be right re Jimi, I haven't sold him yet so could have him instead of Bats. Plus he'll be in a lot of FH teams too.

I would keep him
I wish I had not sold him for Wankson last week and lost a load of value

Benimar

One of Hazard or Kane has to leave my team. Hazard is massively owned by FHers so I’ll be destroyed if he scores heavily. However, neither he nor Chelsea are playing great and have blanked in 5 of the last 10 games. There is an easy replacement in David Silva which would give me 3 City attackers.

Kane is a drain on resources and one of his games is Liverpool away. However, he is capable of scoring any time and is on penalties. With the exception of Aguero, there are question marks (injury, rotation or form) around the other strikers..Lukaku, Rashford, Zaha, Batshuayi, Jimenez. Picking one is risky, picking two might be asking for trouble, especially as Kane is as nailed on as you can get.

Need to make a decision tonight.

Lemlin

I have crap team value so my pick so far is:

Foster
Boly, Schlupp, Dunk, Luiz
Hazard, Milivojevic, Sterling, Pogba
Aguero, Kane

3 x bench fodder

That only leaves me .1 in the bank!