BBFAN wrote: » If it is a serious question then the answer is it all depends on the crime. But your later comments kind of make an eejit out of you. When is the last time you heard the perpetrator of a crime described as a redhead from Kerry with freckles??? :D:D:D:D See how you now look silly?
not yet wrote: » Wow !! thanks for pointing that out. I'll reassess all further posts so as not to make that mistake again..
MrFresh wrote: » Just call him a man. He doesn't want to be referred to by his colour. It's not that difficult.
not yet wrote: » Why is this ?
GinAndBitter wrote: » Yous are all afrophobes :pac:https://twitter.com/sinnfeinireland/status/1110585867746328577?s=19
TeaBagMania wrote: » get used to the phrase "13/90" ...
not yet wrote: Why is this ?
pleas advice wrote: » so I googled that, and got 0.14444444444
A hyperbolic reference to the fact that blacks make up only 13% of the US population but commit the vast majority of all violent crime. In reality, young black males (age 13-40) make up about 3% of the population and are responsible for about 57% of all violent crime. 13/90 is an exaggeration used to make a point about the disproportionate rate at which blacks commit violent crime.
BBFAN wrote: » Fair play. It's good to learn from your mistakes.
GinAndBitter wrote: » Only a fùcking idiot would get offended at being referred to by their colour especially by someone of a different colour. Sounds like the taxi man was looking to play the racist card as per usual. I wonder what I'd be called if I was driving a taxi in Lagos.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Scary stuff and for me all but confirms the suspicion that the EU plans to bring a hundred or so million Africans to Europe.
1641 wrote: » How is Comrade Sellner doing ? Have ye been in touch ? (Is "comrade" the right word ? How do Identitarians address each other ?)https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/28/with-links-to-the-christchurch-attacker-what-is-the-identitarian-movement
Boggles wrote: » Wheeliebin30 wrote: » But clearly not Sinn Féins policies. How do you know, are you familiar with there up to date policies? I don't support them myself. But you would agree throwing up any policies from any party that are over 20 years without citing that fact is pretty disingenuous, agreed?
Wheeliebin30 wrote: » But clearly not Sinn Féins policies.
Wheeliebin30 wrote: » I advise listening to Niall Boylan if you want honesty from our radio presenters.
SporadicMan wrote: » The country is ****ed. How can anyone be positive about the future with all this in mind? What the **** are we doing with our immigration policies? What'll the next census figures look like for Irish population?
not yet wrote: » By all accounts Leo wants it 50/50 by 2040
Patrick2010 wrote: » Not in Balbriggan but Tallaght...https://www.dublinlive.ie/news/dublin-news/shocking-video-shows-warring-thugs-16035394
not yet wrote: » By all accounts Leo wants it 50/50 by 2040.
Wheeliebin30 wrote: » I advise listening to Niall Boylan if you want honesty from our radio presenters. Just said there he spoke out and congratulated the gards for stopping a bus yesterday and detaining to African men who had no i.d. A complaint has been put in against him by the immigration council of Ireland and they asked him to take down his tweet. Well he just let rip at them there and told it unlike anyone else has the balls too. Only one worth listening too on radio.
Kivaro wrote: » Curiously, I've seen that exact same response on boards before as if it somehow mitigated Sinn Fein's open border stance. That racism policy has zero to do with their Sinn Fein's stated open border stance. We continue to hear Sinn Fein representatives advocating for open borders. This repeated response is a poor goalpost movement exercise.
Kivaro wrote: » I have the sense that, even as a newreg, that you are an expert in how boards works, so you are aware that you can only thank the whole post and not parts of it. I'm sure that others found the "I'll get my coat , probably see ya'll in a few weeks" funny just like I did. Maybe you should adjust your outrage level a little bit.
MrFresh wrote: » It would seem fairly logical that if a party brings out a new policy document that deals with immigration and don't mention a previous policy, and don't mention it for the next 18 years, it's safe to say it's no longer a policy.