Atlantic Dawn wrote: » And people wonder why the UK voted for Brexit?
Micky 32 wrote: » I think i’ll hold onto my current 300bhp car for a bit longer then ;-)
NIMAN wrote: » Sounds like one of the many headlines in the Daily Mail for the last 30 years that never happened.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » Just spotted this in tomorrow's Times. Big news for motorists! (click on image to zoom in)http://cf.broadsheet.ie/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/times-19.jpg
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » On the plus side the old stuff should go up in price
Force Carrier wrote: » Delaney looks like he has a tennis ball racket shoved up his hole. There are situations that can arise in driving where it is dangerous to not be able to drive faster than the limit. As such a potentially dangerous feature.
listermint wrote: » Before we all Jump in here and go nuts. What is the imposed limit ? It wouldn't be something like......180kmph would it..
freedominacup wrote: » I've no great problem with it providing it also engages minimum speeds. No more 50kph in an 80kph zone. Can't see that happening at all though.
Working class heroes wrote: » It's an opt out cruise control as opposed to an opt in cruise control.
Edgware wrote: » Can you see Fritz limiting himself to 100 km per hour as he thunders along the Autobahn ?
NSAman wrote: » So Irish motorists will have to pay VRT on all this new technology (which is already available). Irish government charge double tax for safety systems...yes of course it is all about making driving safer.