zweton wrote: » Hi Folks, Any suggestions for building up the upper leg muscles for running? Just recently started so dont know much but would like to work on it. Thanks in advance.
run_Forrest_run wrote: » unless you're specifically training for high burst sprints you don't need to worry about weights and all that nonsense. .
pconn062 wrote: » As someone mentioned, it depends on the type of running you are doing. Sprinting/middle distance typically requires more explosive strength so weights/gym training are pretty essential. But most long distance runners would benefit from gym work too, even if they don't know it.And ignore everyone who says that all you need to do to build muscle strength for running is run. Running is definitely good for specific muscular strength but if you're just starting out running I would get into the habit of incorporating some gym work into your plan. It provides variety and will reduce your likelihood of getting injured. Hill sprints/reps and a great running specific way of building leg strength too but don't write off strength and conditioning. Start with 3-4 key exercises, get someone to show you how to do them or have a look on youtube, throw on a moderate amount of weight and get started. I personally like: split quats, deadlifts, bench press, and calf raises.
Itziger wrote: » John Treacy says 'hello'!!!
KSU wrote: » You mean the two time world cross country champion with a background in grass and drills growing up as well as moving to a college program under a coach who is described as changing the whole program with his conditioning expertise? The one who was forced to shovel track repeatedly during blizzard conditions in order to be able to train?
Itziger wrote: » Yep.
KSU wrote: » So a man who did tons of conditioning (unconsciously) is the reason you think people shouldn’t do conditioning work?
And ignore everyone who says that all you need to do to build muscle strength for running is run
Lazare wrote: » In fairness he didn't say people shouldn't do conditioning work. He was disagreeing with this comment.. All you need to do to build muscle strength for running is run. That statement doesn't say S&C isn't beneficial.
KSU wrote: » I would disagree personally and believe this mentality is the reason why therapist physio appointment books are full across the country especially come marathon season. Just my 2c
pconn062 wrote: » Things have moved on a lot since John Treacy though. If we are using elites as an example, there are very few top level runners these days not doing gym work. Our own recent medal winners Mark English and Ciara Mageann being two examples. My point though was more about the variety and injury prevention that weight training can provide. It shouldn't be written off with "just run more". Most newbies would benefit from a day in the gym over another 5k jog (or ideally, both!).
28064212 wrote: » I don't disagree per se, but why is there an assumption that the person that doesn't know how to sensibly approach running is going to sensibly approach S&C?
rooneyjm wrote: » With all due respect to the poster I’d imagine his running is not that great. If he has for example 8 free hours a week to train then he should spend those hours running, that’s where they will be best spent if they want to improve as a runner. If they want to have nice quads and calves to look at, then hit the gym by all means. People generally are not good enough at their core sport to justify taking an hour or two out of it to lift weights. As a middle ground they could look at doing some body weight squats, lunges, planks, press ups etc after an easy run.