Slydice wrote: » Just finished. Overall it was alright. Story had holes but wrapped up decent enough. Wendell Pierce (Bunk from The Wire) who played Greer definitely shone through.
TomOnBoard wrote: » This show has nothing to do with Tom Clancy/ Cathy/ Jim Greer as portrayed in Clancy's books. It's just their names have been used to populate a character list with recognisable monikers. There's nothing new or original, and there's loads of outrageous coincidence that beggar belief.
Iang87 wrote: » Quick question. The scenes in Syria etc. Should there be subtitles????? As in every non English speaking scene has no subtitles and they go on for a while
TomOnBoard wrote: » Everything I watched had subs for non-English scenes...
Clareman wrote: » Michael B Jordan is joining series 2 as Clark (source: Vanity)
Agent Coulson wrote: » Not the Amazon series but his own Rainbow Six film series.
NIMAN wrote: » Deciding whether to start this or not. If you check out any of the major TV series in the last 10 years on IMDB they all tend to get above 8/10, which would suggest they are all excellent. This is same. So as someone with not much TV viewing time, I have to be a bit more selective. Should I start this one?
FreudianSlippers wrote: » I only just started it recently, and was not hooked in the first 2 episodes... it really starts to pick up in episode 3 IMO and by episode 5 I was hooked in.
bnt wrote: » After one episode, I'm going to persevere because I'm interested in seeing what they do with the character. Most movie versions have not done him justice - Alec Baldwin was the closest, I thought. Early on I saw a few things that threw me off e.g. Ryan is recovering from a major back injury, yet we see him zooming around downtown Washington DC on a bike. He pulls up to CIA headquarters, which apparently looks like a college from the outside, and walks in to a meeting like he had just stepped out of the shower. Never mind that CIA HQ is in Langley VA, over eight miles away, not downtown DC.
bnt wrote: » He pulls up to CIA headquarters, which apparently looks like a college from the outside
pixelburp wrote: » Yeah, it's far from a profound, weighty show and is probably the closest thing to a conventional US network drama Amazon have produced. Not a criticism mind you: I found it slick and tense, plus that Amazon money meant it was far more globe-trotting and epic in scope than anything you would have got on a traditional network (those French slums felt real, authentic for instance).