Wibbs wrote: » Maybe you should actually try reading....So it seems you can have a semiautomatic hunting/sport rifle in different calibers
BabyCheeses wrote: » Sorry folks. I went a bit too far. I need to be more vague like you are. Nobody here supports the shooter, but did he do anything wrong?
Sardonicat wrote: » He shot men women and children at point blank range. Do you think he did anything wrong?
BabyCheeses wrote: » I do. I’m not the one trying to talk about any other killing. I’m not the one defending websites that promote the shooters ideology.
Hector Savage wrote: » Did he do anything wrong ? Are you serious? , has anyone even remotely hinted that they think what he did wasn't a vile vile cowardly act! F*ck him, and f*ck his manifesto - and f*ck people still watching the video and fb hosting it - it's what the c*nt wants! I am surprised I need to be clear on my stance here. That doesn't mean I agree with some media outlets blaming all white Australians or broadcasting the call to prayer in an otherwise secular country.
BabyCheeses wrote: » Sardonicat wrote: » He shot men women and children at point blank range. Do you think he did anything wrong? I do. I’m not the one trying to talk about any other killing. I’m not the one defending websites that promote the shooters ideology.
Wibbs wrote: » BabyCheeses wrote: » Sorry folks. I went a bit too far. I need to be more vague like you are. Nobody here supports the shooter, but did he do anything wrong? Keep digging...
Sardonicat wrote: » Perhaps you should be clear as to who you are addressing your posts to.
WinnyThePoo wrote: » Ah W. I believe he's referencing the large cohort of numpties that gurgle out tropes on this very forum that can found in that manifesto.
BabyCheeses wrote: » Sardonicat wrote: » Perhaps you should be clear as to who you are addressing your posts to. They know themselves. They get overly defensive when you skip past their bull****.
Boggles wrote: » Where does it say that?
BabyCheeses wrote: » To be fair. If the same thing happened here, and it turned out to be you. I wouldn’t be surprised. You repeat the same stuff. Complaining about Muslims is your entire personality. I’m not saying you would do it, but you definitely interact with someone who would and should probably have an eye kept on.
Hector Savage wrote: » Who did this and what website ? Can you link me and ill see if I have a different interpretation ...
Deleted User wrote: » I find that it would be foolish to take any news source as gospel these days. Breitbart have an agenda, in much the same way as any other news agency. The BBC, CNN, Fox et al are all different cheeks of the same ****ty arse. Just because Breitbard lean a different way than you lean, doesn't make them pond scum. CNN, MSNBC and other outlets that would be more along your way of thinking are equally egregious when it comes to unbiased reporting
Wibbs wrote: » What semi-automatic firearms are affected by today’s changes? Two types of firearms are now defined as MSSAs: A semi-automatic firearm capable of being used with a detachable magazine which holds more than five cartridges A semi-automatic shotgun capable of being used with a detachable magazine which holds more than five cartridges. Semi-automatic .22 calibre rimfire firearms with a magazine which holds no more than 10 rounds Semi-automatic and pump action shotguns with a non-detachable tubular magazine which holds no more than five rounds No mention of caliber restrictions. So a semiautomatic firearm chambered for say .308 with a five round magazine is still legal. A lever action chambered for the same round doesn't get a mention. Ditto for bolt action. No mention of pump or lever action firearms other than shotguns. It's all focused on one type because "semiautomatic" are the "dangerous" weapons. Clueless.
"Six days after this attack, we are announcing a ban on all military style semi-automatics (MSSA) and assault rifles in New Zealand,"...Related parts used to convert these guns into MSSAs are also being banned, along with all high-capacity magazines
BabyCheeses wrote: » Zorya I think. Might have mixed up the names. They were talking about Nigeria. Breitbart. I’m sure it’s just a normal center website to you. All the comments are from people who are just concerned about mass immigration.
BabyCheeses wrote: » Hector Savage wrote: » Who did this and what website ? Can you link me and ill see if I have a different interpretation ... Zorya I think. Might have mixed up the names. They were talking about Nigeria. Breitbart. I’m sure it’s just a normal center website to you. All the comments are from people who are just concerned about mass immigration.
Wibbs wrote: » Holy fucking christ, you've a neck as hard as a jockey's bollocks to make such a shabby accusation and character assignation like that.
Deleted User wrote: » They are classifying as MSSA any semi-auto rifle capable of being used with a detachable >5 round magazine. (except .22 or smaller rimfire) And similarly any semi-auto shotgun capable of being used with a detachable >5 round magazine. Because of the term capable, my interpretation is that almost anything large calibre usable with a detachable magazine is now banned. Only old-fashioned semi-auto rifles with integral tube magazines (5 rounds or less) are still allowed.https://www.police.govt.nz/advice/firearms-and-safety/changes-firearms (link to actual order here)
Certain semi-automatic firearms declared to be military style semi-automatic firearms For the purposes of the Arms Act 1983, the following firearms are declared to be military style semi-automatic firearms: (a) a semi-automatic firearm that is capable of being used in combination with a detachable magazine (other than one designed to hold 0.22-inch or less rimfire cartridges) that is capable of holding more than 5 cartridges: (b) a semi-automatic firearm that is a shotgun and that is capable of being used in combination with a detachable magazine that is capable of holding more than 5 cartridges.
BabyCheeses wrote: » To be fair. If the same thing happened here, and it turned out to be you. I wouldn’t be surprised. You repeat the same stuff. Complaining about Muslims is your entire personality. I’m not saying you would do it, but you definitely interact with someone who would and should probably have an eye kept on..
Zorya wrote: » I saw the story on the Christian Post
Hector Savage wrote: » Still sniping even after I made my position clear. I don't trust Breitbart, they would be too far to the right - even for an evil nazi like me ... :rolleyes:
Boggles wrote: » Oh yeah, that bastion of sanity.
tuxy wrote: » No, there is only one place that he could go legally and that is extradition to Australia. Massive headache legally and would make New Zealand look bad for not taking care of its responsibility. I don't know if Australia could punish him for a crime that happened elsewhere. He would be safe in solitary, the chances of staff causing him harm would be very slim.
Hector Savage wrote: » Sardonicat wrote: » Perhaps you should be clear as to who you are addressing your posts to. Wow! Just. F*cking W0W!!
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dcbc16ebc222633fce50824c4b8e3c07.svg)
