Kivaro wrote: » Likewise, I'm put off by the Muslim call to prayer that will be broadcasted nationally on TV and radio to the whole country of New Zealand on Friday. My view as an atheist is that I do not want to hear any call to prayer; irrespective of the faith. And I'm sure that there are many Kiwi's with similar sentiments.
Boggles wrote: » There are people all over the world being killed and persecuted for their religion. The feud cited by Breitbart has to do with land and natural resources. Knock yourself out.https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nigeria-christians-muslims/
Wibbs wrote: » Semiautomatic hunting/sport rifle, chambered for a range of rounds, more accurate than an "assault rifle", yet won't be circumscribed by the new legislation.
Deleted User wrote: » It's a very multi faceted feud
Boggles wrote: » Exactly, that's why no one should really take the likes of Breitbart seriously, they are absolute pond scum.
Zorya wrote: » BTW, sorry I cannot engage regarding the gun issue. Guns, football, cars - with all these my brain helplessly freezes and I go completely bovine.
Deleted User wrote: » Just because Breitbard lean a different way than you lean
Wibbs wrote: » Basically with this new gun law in NZ in many cases if a firearm has a lovely wooden stock, nice carving on the grips a bonus, it'll be OK, if it's jet black with a plastic stock and looks "military" it won't be, even if it's the exact same firearm. Semiautomatic "sports/hunting" rifles OK, semiautomatic "military style" not OK. That's before we get to collectible vintage firearms, including those that were used by militaries in the past. Chances are high they'll be OK too. From my reading of the proposed new laws anyway.
Boggles wrote: » Fact checking and multiple sources? Surely that's a good thing, do you not do the same?
Deleted User wrote: » Not sure what you mean by just taking that part of my post. I said that I wouldn't class Breitbart as pond scum just because they report news in a way that doesn't suit your views.
Hector Savage wrote: » Get used to that call, it will be heard a lot more in the west as the years go by.
Boggles wrote: » You mean not accurately and with a fairly bat shít agenda? I just gave you a glaring example with a full explanation. It's up to you where ever you fill your brain. Gone off topic, so we will leave it there.
BabyCheeses wrote: » I hear there’s an Australian guy that came up with a solution that might be of interest to you.
Danzy wrote: » That and wearing the head scarf are over doing it. Making it a circus of self indulgence and virtue.
Zorya wrote: » I think we all feel similarly short-changed by what goes by ''news'' these days
[Deleted User] wrote: » pretty poor taste. I don't think it's unreasonable to feel uncomfortable by the call to prayer. When I was in Morocco, I disliked hearing it immensely. But that is the way in Morocco so I expected it and respected it. It is certainly not something I would like to hear ringing out in my neighbourhood.
Boggles wrote: » I don't, it's never been easier to fact check claims. People just don't bother their arsés because it doesn't suit their agendas or they are just lazy and gullible and they'll believe anything that is written on the side of a bus.
PopePalpatine wrote: » If only those stuck-up females would give up their fantasies of having a career and breed with alpha studs like yourself.
BabyCheeses wrote: » Oh I’m in poor taste, sorry. Let’s go back to defending the website aimed at people who defend this shooting.
Boggles wrote: » None of that is actually true. They are limiting calibre and magazines sizes, among other things. It doesn't matter what they look like./t will be limited to .22 calibre with a max 10 round magazine.
Hector Savage wrote: » I am married We have 2 kids. My wife just got her PhD and is very independent - has never asked me for a penny and makes more $$ than I do. But keep shooting and missing spectacularly...
Zorya wrote: » Everyone except you, right?
BabyCheeses wrote: » Sorry folks. I went a bit too far. I need to be more vague like you are. Nobody here supports the shooter, but did he do anything wrong?
