orourkeda1977 wrote: » Possibly because the driver was too cheap to use the tunnel.
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » The driver should be locked in jail for 2 months and so should the owner of the company, there's no excuse for this absolute incompetence which costs the economy millions every year in lost productivity. It was a UK registered truck with a trailer from HMT Shipping Ltd.https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D1tEXdIXgAAHbTM.jpg
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » Tunnel is free for trucks.
corner of hells wrote: » His house and neighbours houses should also be burned to the ground , his family forced to work in the salt mines and he should be made watch re runs of the Eurovision forever.
Brian_Graham wrote: » Anyone know how the truck got stuck under Amiens St railway bridge on Friday? It looks to me from the pictures like it's not a straightforward case of the truck being too tall for the bridge. Double deck buses pass under that bridge all the time. The bridge clearance is 4.69m, which is higher than the max legal height for any vehicle (4.65m). I suspect the truck somehow tilted before it hit the bridge. Could be partly caused by the storm? Or a combination of wind and swerving to avoid something? Obviously I don't want anyone saying "x was clearly to blame", we've no way of knowing for sure. But anyone got any theories?
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » The driver should be locked in jail for 2 months and so should the owner of the company, there's no excuse for this absolute incompetence which costs the economy millions every year in lost productivity. It was a UK registered truck with a trailer from HMT Shipping Ltd.https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D1tEXdIXgAAHbTM.jpg:large
tom1ie wrote: » Jaysus. Relax buddy!
expectationlost wrote: » why don't they put up those warning ropes
looksee wrote: » He had too much air in his tyres.