nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

lbc2019

Some of her posts on twitter lately seem to be off the charts.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Edgware

The Nal wrote: »

Shameful stuff from her but to be expected. Shes a twisted evil bitch.

She would have done a great job in the Aras allright. And plenty of gob****es on this site wanted her to get the job

Auntie Semite

As someone who has defended Gemma here, I'm fairly disgusted that she posted this.

Blueshoe

Auntie Semite wrote: »

As someone who has defended Gemma here, I'm fairly disgusted that she posted this.

What did she post?

Auntie Semite

Blueshoe wrote: »

What did she post?

Saying it was a false flag

Ipso

So how many false flags have there been to take away our freedoms? And why do they keep happening if they were meant to have already ben taken away?

Edgware

Auntie Semite wrote: »

As someone who has defended Gemma here, I'm fairly disgusted that she posted this.

Dont be too upset. There will be another anti establishment conspiracy bandwagon along soon you can jump on

The Nal

Ipso wrote: »

So how many false flags have there been to take away our freedoms? And why do they keep happening if they were meant to have already ben taken away?

150 years of false flags going back to the Rothschilds in the 1800s yet.... here we are. With more freedom than ever.

Blueshoe

Auntie Semite wrote: »

Saying it was a false flag

A false flag as in it didn't happen or a false flag as in some outside party is the culprit

Ipso

The Nal wrote: »

150 years of false flags going back to the Rothschilds in the 1800s yet.... here we are. With more freedom than ever.

Yeah, conspiracy theorists make great psychological case studies.
Unfortunately with stuff like this, I don't think outrage (as people make careers out of outraging people they disagree with) or censorship will work.
She needs to be constantly called on her bullsh!t and asked is she a liar or ignorant, along with people who support her.

Ipso

Blueshoe wrote: »

A false flag as in it didn't happen or a false flag as in some outside party is the culprit

Not sure yet, she didn't release the details of her exhaustive hour online investigation.

For Forks Sake

Maurice Yeltsin wrote: »

She is funny. She appeals to a permanently angry rage against the machine freeman on the land type. She is light hearted comic relief and by getting so worked up about her rather than laughing at the content you are truly giving her too much credit.

I'd actually like to see her in the Dail as an independent. For the lolz.

It's that sort of complacency got us landed with Trump and Brexit.

Sir Oxman

B0jangles wrote: »

It is a conscious tactic used by current Neo-Nazis as a recruiting tool - see also the style guide used by open white supremacist Andrew Anglin to guide his followers on how to present themselves and their propoganda in a way that lets them keep repeating their key points while avoiding being too visibly extremist until they've sufficiently indoctrinated their targets.

<snip>

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/daily-stormer-nazi-style-guide_us_5a2ece19e4b0ce3b344492f2

Once you are aware of the tactic it becomes very easy to spot.

100% this occurs here, day in day out.

Blueshoe

Sir Oxman wrote: »

100% this occurs here, day in day out.

The Huffington post though. What's next BuzzFeed?

An Ciarraioch

Blueshoe wrote: »

The Huffington post though. What's next BuzzFeed?

Strangely enough, the latter's political reporting has been incredibly accurate on Brexit.

TomSweeney

Auntie Semite wrote: »

As someone who has defended Gemma here, I'm fairly disgusted that she posted this.

Yeah this was it for me, I didn't like the anti vax bollocks either , but this is a new low, calling it a false flag !!! ffs!!

Hotblack Desiato

donspeekinglesh wrote: »

The same was posted on Facebook, I reported it, but it doesn't violate Facebook's standards.

Fûckin' Hitler himself wouldn't violate Facebook's "standards" :rolleyes:

donspeekinglesh

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Fûckin' Hitler himself wouldn't violate Facebook's "standards" :rolleyes:

My report was updated. She took it down.

Annasopra

Larbre34 wrote: »

I don't think a 'U ok hun?' will cut the mustard this time.

She is actually ill in some manner.

I dont think she is. I think she is genuinely exploiting a gap in the market to make money for herself.

Annasopra

Auntie Semite wrote: »

As someone who has defended Gemma here, I'm fairly disgusted that she posted this.

To be honest you should be ashamed for having defended her in the first place. It's not like this is her first vile hateful tweet.

Annasopra

wingsof daun wrote: »

Hold on, calling it a "false flag" is not necessarily hate-mongering. Can anyone prove it WASN'T? She does not deny that 49 people died. A false flag does not need to have actors. A group with an agenda can recruit someone to murder, but the group behind the atrocity remain hidden and can wash their hands. It will now be more difficult to criticize or question the merits of multiculturalism in the land down under.
Cool off on the hatred of O'Doherty. She is a woman, so, can't be a great leader because feelings and emotions are too prominent. If she wants a revolution a man should lead it. You lot want to censor her with your beloved hate-speech laws like anti-muslim or anti-semitism laws, thereby giving a potentially evil cabal total unaccountability for their actions. That is if such a powerful, subversive cabal exists or if it was to come into being.

Nah. She's an extremist hate monger and You're a naive deluded mysogynist.

pjohnson

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

To be honest you should be ashamed for having defended her in the first place. It's not like this is her first vile hateful tweet.

Tbf those who defended her before probably arent that outraged now

Achasanai

wingsof daun wrote: »

Hold on, calling it a "false flag" is not necessarily hate-mongering. Can anyone prove it WASN'T?

You can't prove a negative. And anyway, the onus is on O'Doherty to prove her theory, not the other way around.

Mongfinder General

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

The ladies swoon at that sort of talk, they need a real man such as yerself to tell them what's what. :rolleyes:

I think he wants to give her a damn good seeing too. I think she went bat **** crazy when her husband died.

Some of the stuff on her page lately is nuts. 5G conspiracy, anti vax, etc. she has a massive hard on for John Waters. Her reaction to yesterday's events probably puts her in the loonie tunes bracket of politics.

one world order

She was correct about the MSM using these attacks to turn people against each other. It wasn't long ago when the US and Britain were funding extremist groups in Iraq and Syria which grew into ISIS. As the MSM continues use these attacks to divide people, we will be distracted from the plans of our luciferian worshipping controllers.

pjohnson

one world order wrote: »

She was correct about the MSM using these attacks to turn people against each other. It wasn't long ago when the US and Britain were funding extremist groups in Iraq and Syria which grew into ISIS. As the MSM continues use these attacks to divide people, we will be distracted from the plans of our luciferian worshipping controllers.

Now this is more like it from Gemma fans! Semite and Tom and co. ye can come back now One World Order gave ye the get out of jail conspiracy theory ye needed!

gman2k

one world order wrote:

She was correct about the MSM using these attacks to turn people against each other. It wasn't long ago when the US and Britain were funding extremist groups in Iraq and Syria which grew into ISIS. As the MSM continues use these attacks to divide people, we will be distracted from the plans of our luciferian worshipping controllers.

There is a bridge somewhere missing it's troll

Annasopra

one world order wrote: »

She was correct about the MSM using these attacks to turn people against each other. It wasn't long ago when the US and Britain were funding extremist groups in Iraq and Syria which grew into ISIS. As the MSM continues use these attacks to divide people, we will be distracted from the plans of our luciferian worshipping controllers.

Kalergi plan
Un pact
Globalist cabal
Cultural marxists
Unicorns
LGBT paedophiles
False flags
Soros traitors
5G Wind Turbines
Vaccines cause autism

Have we hit bullsh it bingo yet. Are we there yet? Any more to add?

super_furry

one world order wrote: »

She was correct about the MSM using these attacks to turn people against each other. It wasn't long ago when the US and Britain were funding extremist groups in Iraq and Syria which grew into ISIS. As the MSM continues use these attacks to divide people, we will be distracted from the plans of our luciferian worshipping controllers.

Is that you Gemma? Only other person I've ever seen use the word Luciferian.....

francois

gman2k wrote: »

There is a bridge somewhere missing it's troll

Don't feed it

The Nal

Is there a mod deleting posts in this thread?