Van.Bosch wrote: » If I was them I would have taken the full hit at Shannon and cancelled a route there entirely. Not popular but the hub is where the future is.
Tenger wrote: » If Hartford is getting A321LR from August 2nd I’m guessing delivery now due 4-5 days before hand? We should see assembly site photos in late June/early July.
JCX BXC wrote: » Try harder.
irishkopite93 wrote: » Is the RJ painted in full livery bad news for Stobarts hope of renewing their franchise agreement? Or do they even want to renew it?
alancostello wrote: » I don't see how these two are supposed to be connected? Are you suggesting that CityJet are going to be taking over the Regional ops?
irishkopite93 wrote: » https://m.independent.ie/business/irish/stobart-gets-set-to-face-aer-lingus-challengers-37007399.html It has been suggested that they'll be challenging for the contract. I'm just curious if there's a reason the RJ got the new livery ahead of the ATR's? Is there any plan to schedule the ATR's for painting? Or is it an early indication that city jet have in fact been successful in their challenge for the regional ops?
L1011 wrote: » It's not an early indication of anything. The LCY deal is unconnected. It got the livery as it wasn't in a proper colour scheme at all. Many of the ATRs are too new to be approaching their first repaint yet either. A WX bid for the full franchise agreement would involve new aircraft - the RJ is an oddity for its limited route alone
irishkopite93 wrote: » Is there a reason Stobart didn't push for the LCY route? The ATR is capable of steep approach and I think they previously did LCY in the AerArann days? Also they have E190s if it was a case of AerLingus preferring a jet on the route. And despite the age of the ATR's surely there'll be a timeframe for them to get the re-brand?
California Dreamer wrote: » STK also operate for BACF using one of the E-190's.
Van.Bosch wrote: » Regardless of A320/321/330 or ATR, im surprised at how slow the re brand is taking. I get that it takes a long time etc and you need to take the aircraft out of service but would have thought there would be more done by now.
kevinandrew wrote: » The overall rebrand has moved at considerable pace, digital, airport signage and printed work but the repaint has indeed been very slow, just five repaints in two months. I don't know how much hanger space IAC have or how many aircraft they can do at a time but the British Airways retrojets may have taken up some of their time. Summer is around the corner so they'd want to pick up the pace.
vectorvictor wrote: » Repainting will be done to the same schedule as would have been the case without a rebrand. They won't be repainting any aircraft before due "just because". If an aircraft is due a repaint in 3 months or 3 years then that's when it will get it. This is why the rebrand/refresh cost "only" €2m
Nijmegen wrote: » Isn’t the Lufthansa livery rollout slated to take something mad like 8 years.
Shn99 wrote: » Will be done by 2023
cson wrote: » AA are still rolling with some aircraft in their classic livery (MD-88s for the most part),
Van.Bosch wrote: » Is the second Avro still at FCO getting repainted?
Captain_Crash wrote: » Only the MD’s are in the old livery, none are being painted as they’re all getting retired by next year. One 737 in the old silver but is being kept as a “heritage” jet!
cson wrote: » They actually have a lot of aircraft in retro livery;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_fleet Flew on the US Airways one recently.
Phil.x wrote: » Are all of the A330 aircrafts painted in the new livery now?