punisher5112 wrote: » It could do with a bell sounding all the time.
punisher5112 wrote: » Eh the Luas ran a signal. The bus had a green light.
Alf Veedersane wrote: » Well, apart from the crash with the bus on O'Connell St but the driver was acquitted on direction of the judge due to a degree of conflict in evidence
Gulliver wrote: » Is there any breakdown of where the unfortunate pedestrians were from? I'm just wondering if it was tourists or non-locals who weren't familiar with the system who got killed.
Paulzx wrote: » What's the problem with the Luas signalling systems? I'm not aware of one incident involving the Luas where the tram itself broke a signal
punisher5112 wrote: » Not high pitched but like a cat bell.... Just enough for the rodents.... I mean people... To hear
iamwhoiam wrote: » That would be seriously annoying for all people living close enough to the Luas to hear it .
Tow wrote: » Back when it was initially finished. They admitted (well their engineers) that digging out the embankment rather then building a bridge at Beachwood was a mistake.
Tow wrote: » Back when it was initially finished. They admitted (well their engineers) that digging out the embankment rather then building a bridge at Beachwood was a mistake. The Green Line's original plans had a cycle way/walkway along the Harcourt Street Line section. This was never implemented as the two tracks were laid (far apart) to allow for the metro upgrade, which did not leave enough room. But now that the metro upgrade is not going ahead, a special cycle way is going to be built along roads running largely parallel to the track. Joint up think at it's best!
Tow wrote: » But now that the metro upgrade is not going ahead, a special cycle way is going to be built along roads running largely parallel to the track. Joint up think at it's best!
antoinolachtnai wrote: » You can say the Luas wasn't responsible for these other incidents in some legal sense, but the system certainly did result in new risks to road-users.
wakka12 wrote: » Only 6 pedestrians have been killed in 15 years, so less than one every two years with over 41.8 million passengers riding it safely annually (or almost 100 million people riding it safely every two years vs one person dying), and of course most deaths and accidents are through the fault of the pedestrian themselves anyway The design is fine and as good or better than most tram systems world wide
murpho999 wrote: » Are you really saying that people don't see a 60 meter tram because of clouds in the sky? If they were looking at the clouds they wouldn't see the tram either. Ridiculous argument.
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » Good point. It blends in with the dull city streets, plus the skies are grey over Dublin 3 quarters of the yr. A new paint scheme could definitely reduce incidents.
Johnny Dogs wrote: » The biggest design flaw was having two Luas lines in a relatively small city that didn't hook up imo.
magic_murph wrote: » Do you think there are design flaws with the luas and the signaling systems etc considering the amount of accident and actual deaths that have been linked with it.
Boom_Bap wrote: » Badly designed? It looks like The Terminators mickey!