one world order wrote: » Forbes?? Really, you can count their wealth on a public list. Did it also happen to mention their share of the US federal reserve?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » a family where the richest person is outside the top 1000 is not running the world.
batgoat wrote: » Auntie Semite, it was perfectly accurate and you have disproven nothing. You get very aggressive when you're really not winning your argument. Well at least you're blatantly honest about the fact you subscribe to Nazi era conspiracies.
Auntie Semite wrote: » Again I did not say anything about running the world. Maybe you should pay more attention.
batgoat wrote: » You're totally trying to push that claim, you posted a picture of one of them with Prince Charles as if it signified something. :rolleyes:
Auntie Semite wrote: » It showed that they are an important family. As I said already, you can easily dismiss the conspiracy claims without making inaccurate statements.
batgoat wrote: » Fun fact, the Rothschild's were a family of significance in the 19th century. Not so much now... Cause I'm pretty sure you believe them to be a part of the evil conspiracy.
wingsof daun wrote: » It is easy to give all to these labels and derogatory names to people. Ever think there may be people who do not have our best interest at heart? That they r mad for control and world domination? If people research a bit themselves they might know that she is on the ball on a lot of issues. I see propaganda making people ashamed of their European culture, that is hatred directed towards us but people swallow the propaganda. Multicultural crap in adds. If there were European blooded people in African or middle eastern adverts there would be an outcry. Russians in the USSR fell for propaganda and were nearly genocided, history repeats itself.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » The propaganda is coming from The GO'D Squad. Her allies in Irexit even created fake candidates in Kerry
Auntie Semite wrote: » Whether they peaked in the 19th century is irrelevant, many members of the family today have significant interests in a multitude of billion dollar interests. Even Wikipedia will tell you this. its a plain matter of fact. Edit ..I see the family is considered to be worth 400 billion, most people would regard that as significant. The reason I chime in is because you and others consistently and arrogantly dismiss the views of others whilst posting or countering with thoroughly inaccurate information yourselves. If you are going to accuse others of holding inaccurate info make sure yours is completely factual otherwise it somewhat diminishes your argument. You could have deconstructed the Rothschild conspiracy with facts but you chose to post inaccurate information yourself. Don't bother attempting to get into a long argument about what constitutes 'significant' I'm not interested
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Ah so basically you want to throw out your off the wall outlandish conspiracy theories and you want nobody to respond to you
batgoat wrote: » He's not pushing Rotschild conspiracies... He just believes that they are in some way noteworthy in the present century.... Those guys from Limerick who run Stripe are way more substantial in terms of significance. :pac:
batgoat wrote: » Erm this is the post you responded to. You responded with a photo of one of the Rotschilds with Prince Charles as if it signified political influence. Combined with your username and tendency to love conspiracies, it would indicate that you seem to think that there's something there in the conspiracy. In the 19th Century, the Rotschilds were consolidated wealth, now most of the wealth has been distributed and diluted as a direct result. It's inheritance so mainly a load of millionaires. But nobody of any major note. So yep, insignificant.
Auntie Semite wrote: » https://www.ft.com/content/4812320a-4566-11e9-b168-96a37d002cd3 From today in the Financial Times Most people would regard a group who owns 98% of a private bank with close to 150 Billion in assets under management as 'significant' Maybe you don't...lucky you.
Auntie Semite wrote: » You see guys, you have a habit of jumping on the slightest misstep, the smallest inaccuracy, or mis-typed sentence and then dismissing a persons entire argument based on that. You might forgive me if I do the same.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » link doesnt work
TaurenDruid wrote: » But when you repeatedly misstep, spout inaccuracies and mis-type sentences - and "just mention" outlandish conspiracy theories that you're just referencing, "no, not actually something I believe in, I'm just mentioning it...", and keep on doing it... well, yeah, some of us have you pegged...
Auntie Semite wrote: » The only context in which I mentioned the conspiracy theory, was to dismiss it myself.
Auntie Semite wrote: » You're also doing her the service of keeping her on the front page of AH. I would imagine there are far more lurkers here than posters, many of them will check her channel out of curiosity and find they agree with her on many issues.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » And many will see that she is being robustly challenged and exposed for the blatant black propagandist that she is.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Only if they are idiots.
