marieholmfan wrote: » In fairness she shines a light into areas no one else will talk about. Police corruption. Political corruption. Press corruption.
super_furry wrote: » HEY dude, want to play some videogames? You can use my throbbing flesh coloured joystick!
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » Her nonsensical ramblings and nasty attacks actually do harm to the causes she claims to support.
humberklog wrote: » What a load of meandering, scaremongering guff. If you're fooled by this disingenuous charlatan then you're a dopeyhole.
humberklog wrote: » I listened to her recent YouTube regarding the ACI meeting in Ashbourne. What a load of meandering, scaremongering guff. If you're fooled by this disingenuous charlatan then you're a dopeyhole. Looking like Oswald Mosley did make me laugh. As did her dewy eyed recollection of St. Patrick's Day of yore and hoping we can reclaim it as the reverential day of appreciation it once was (when was that?). The fact that St. Patrick was a foreigner spreading a new religion in Ireland was kinda lost on her Celtic dreamscape lie. What a wagon.
super_furry wrote: » Thing is, there's no shortage of them. No-hopers and shut-ins who are just desperate for someone to blame for their own short-comings.
Birneybau wrote: » It is, and always will be, an opportunity to get hammered. Not much more than that.
Grayson wrote: » It is now but it wasn't always. Pubs were closed on St. Patrick's day. However in the US it was used as an excuse to get drunk. Drinking on St. Paddy's day is actually an american tradition we imported. However now it's started, I'm sure it'll never go away.
francois wrote: » The pubs were closed, however there was the dog show in the RDS which sold alcohol until 1961, which proved inexplicably popular
Grayson wrote: » I'm not falling for that again.
gman2k wrote: » She doesn't speak or present like a person with an actual mental illness. But it's disconcerting for rational people to listen to her "crazy" outpourings. She's a hateful individual, who is doing genuine harm to people she has targeted with her outlandish conspiracies. She is presenting as homophobic, racist, xenophobic etc. before we even get to her anti Vax views, the anti semite Soros /globalist theory....... She's the delusional idiot who put herself forward to be President of this nation, and has ramped up her extreme rightwing bile, so forgive us if we call her crazy.
wingsof daun wrote: » gman2k wrote: » She doesn't speak or present like a person with an actual mental illness. But it's disconcerting for rational people to listen to her "crazy" outpourings. She's a hateful individual, who is doing genuine harm to people she has targeted with her outlandish conspiracies. She is presenting as homophobic, racist, xenophobic etc. before we even get to her anti Vax views, the anti semite Soros /globalist theory....... She's the delusional idiot who put herself forward to be President of this nation, and has ramped up her extreme rightwing bile, so forgive us if we call her crazy. It is easy to give all to these labels and derogatory names to people. Ever think there may be people who do not have our best interest at heart? That they r mad for control and world domination? If people research a bit themselves they might know that she is on the ball on a lot of issues. I see propaganda making people ashamed of their European culture, that is hatred directed towards us but people swallow the propaganda. Multicultural crap in adds. If there were European blooded people in African or middle eastern adverts there would be an outcry. Russians in the USSR fell for propaganda and were nearly genocided, history repeats itself.
one world order wrote: » She's definitely on the ball with a lot of issues. You just have to look at the MSM and see their constant anti Russian propaganda. Sad that we are so easily manipulated by the MSM and swayed by those that control the world.
Larbre34 wrote: Read Bill Browder's book' Red Notice' and decide for yourself about the principles and tactics of the Russian political and judicial architecture.
wingsof daun wrote: Ever think there may be people who do not have our best interest at heart? That they r mad for control and world domination? If people research a bit themselves they might know that she is on the ball on a lot of issues.
Larbre34 wrote: » Read Bill Browder's book' Red Notice' and decide for yourself about the principles and tactics of the Russian political and judicial architecture. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.
one world order wrote: » Is it about a group of families that own the worlds reserve currency, spending money on foreign groups to destabilise countries, getting involved in conflicts with over 50 countries since WW2, invading and bombing countries, sending in the IMF and World Bank to strip the assets of the country and in slave them to debt?
batgoat wrote: » Fun fact, the Rothschild's were a family of significance in the 19th century. Not so much now... Cause I'm pretty sure you believe them to be a part of the evil conspiracy.
batgoat wrote: » Auntie Semite subscribing to a World War 2 conspiracy, I am shocked!
Auntie Semite wrote: » Who said I subscribed to anything? You claimed that the Rothschild family are of no significance, this is plainly untrue. They are an extremely important family in international finance, business, mining, philanthropy, Art, property, this is all easily researched and is all public and above board. Conspiracy has nothing to do with it. Why must you tell untruths when making your point?
Also, the Rothschilds began acquiring their wealth in the 1700s, and since then the family has spawned hundreds of descendants, so there is no longer any centralized Rothschild family wealth. The closest thing to a “Rothschild Family” business in 2016 is the Rothschild Group, a multinational investment banking company, but that firm does not in itself generate nearly enough income to back up claims about the family’s wealth. In 2015, the Rothschild Group’s annual revenue was approximately $500 million. In comparison, the world’s largest company, Walmart, has an annual revenue of nearly $500 billion. It should also be noted that only one member of the Rothschild family is included among Forbes’ 2015 list of the world’s billionaires: Benjamin de Rothschild, who was ranked at number #1121 with a net worth of $1.61 billion.https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rothschild-family-wealth/
batgoat wrote: » Their peak was in the 19th century. Only one member of the family made it onto the Forbes wealthiest people list, he was 1121st place with a a worth of 1.6 billion dollars. That's a lot but insignificant by modern standards and he's unlikely to shift geopolitical affairs. Source for youhttps://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rothschild-family-wealth/ And every time, you claim not to subscribe to a conspiracy but you seem to give all of them plenty of credence. And I was completely accurate in terms of describing them as pretty insignificant.
Auntie Semite wrote: » Whether they peaked in the 19th century is irrelevant, many members of the family today have significant interests in a multitude of billion dollar interests. Even Wikipedia will tell you this. its a plain matter of fact. The reason I chime in is because you and others consistently and arrogantly dismiss the views of others whilst posting or countering with thoroughly inaccurate information yourselves. If you are going to accuse others of holding inaccurate info make sure yours in completely factual otherwise it somewhat diminishes your argument. You could have deconstructed the Rothschild conspiracy with facts but you chose to post inaccurate information yourself.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/b605825002726fa398519aca553ff0db.svg)
