Ryath wrote: » Looks small on the 17"s alright. They have a pack for ~€1300 that give's you 18" alloys, LED headlights and tinted windows. I only saw one listed on carzone with it though. Test drove the 1.0 St line it wasn't bad up to near 100 but needs to be worked. Liked the interior and it handles well. Would at least need to be able to get the 1.5 to consider it though. Being offered way less on trade in and the 5.9% pcp rate would added a bit over €4k to the cost to change was making it a definite non runner. Megane 1.3 130bhp I test drove was much better especially above 100 and it didn't have be worked anyway as hard. Neither are a patch on though VAG 1.5tsi even in 130bhp version in the Leon I drove it was much livelier. Can only get the 150bhp in the Leon with the automatic but couldn't find any of them to test drive. Only got to test a manual 150bhp in a Golf and it was good improvement. Only 1.5 DSG I could find to test was a T ROC. Hate the high seating position and wallowy handling but the engine left a very good impression on me.
Toyotafanboi wrote: » BOSTIK wrote: » Thought passing this milestone justified a post. Not bad for a petrol yoke.https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/attachment.php?attachmentid=475127&stc=1&d=1552244978 Looks like a Toyota gauge cluster, Avensis Mk1 or Carina? Not a bother to it!
BOSTIK wrote: » Thought passing this milestone justified a post. Not bad for a petrol yoke.https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/attachment.php?attachmentid=475127&stc=1&d=1552244978
Toyotafanboi wrote: » Looks like a Toyota gauge cluster, Avensis Mk1 or Carina? Not a bother to it!
CIP4 wrote: » Yes but like you shouldn’t have to spray a car that’s a month old with 4K km on it because of stone chips. That aside they said stone chips aren’t their problem.
GustavoFring wrote: » Wheels are too small on any I've seen bar one which had some aftermarket tat on it but looked better than the standard ones.
James Bond Junior wrote: » And it is FUGLY.
tcawley29 wrote: » Could he not insist on getting a warranty paint job too?
CIP4 wrote: » Drove a relations new model 191 ST-Line focus 1.0 ecoboost actually liked it more than I thought I would to drive the engine feels ok for 3 cylinder you can get the acceleration out of it but you do have to work it. Build quality is not hectic though paint is seriously soft covered in stone chips after a month and he would deliberately be careful keeping back from trucks etc. The panels are very light and bend with any kind of pressure. Then the worse part is it has serious suspension creaks and noises when driving it’s going in to get new modified drop links and ball joints with 6k km on it known issue apparently. So seems Ford have some serious creases to iron out on this new model.
Marcusm wrote: » I didn’t mean to suggest you couldn’t read the sign; meant that they might have filled all tanks with the same fuel.
CIP4 wrote: » No it’s on the radio and all special deal for this weekend only obviously only in stations that sell miles and miles plus fuel. Plus I am intelligent enough to be able to read miles plus vs miles off the sign and hose to realise they are different and not two of the same miles fuel :pac:
colm_mcm wrote: » Doesn’t the standard fuel claim to take you up to 3% further than standard petrol, so this Miles Plus is only up to 3% better than their own regular fuel? They say it’s better and gives more power because it cleans your engine, not because the fuel is more powerful. Snake oil.
Marcusm wrote: » Are they really selling it at the same price or do both hoses fill at the same price because they are both delivering Miles not Milesplus? I was chatting to a Topaz delivery driver and he said very few of the Dublin based stations (where I would expect to find the greatest number of wasteful customers, myself included) were getting deliveries of Milesplus.
CIP4 wrote: » Certain Topaz petrol stations are selling miles plus petrol and diesel for the same price as regular fuel. Got some this morning however the car was fairly full already so only got 20 litres in so the benefits will be diluted down but have a long drive this afternoon so will see if I notice any difference in fuel consumption or engine performance.
ShadowHearth wrote: » I can't really agree when it comes to System/classic bricks. As an adult, I spent about 2k+ eu on Lego and as you can imagine I built a few sets. They did added a lot of new parts, which open up more building shapes. You still have all old parts in circulation too. What I do hate about new sets: too many stickers. Very rarely printed bricks are used. What I am not fan off, is the new Technic sets. They are really cool sets when built, but they are not as fun to build, like normal Lego. In most cases you just keep putting pins and bars together and only feel the shape come together in the end. On top of that, it's very hard to build your own stuff with Technic. You need to plan it out in advance, where's with normal bricks, you can just slap stuff together and see where it will get you. That's why I asked for this mustang set over Technic porches etc.
colm_mcm wrote: » Can of worms here, I loved Lego as a child, but the way they’ve gone now with specific bits makes them a bit like a **** self-build model car to me. I just don’t get it. Not a criticism of that car, but more of Lego in general. My son is around Lego age now, age he’s got a few of the small sets already, but they seem more restrictive than the ones that were out when I was his age.