nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

lbc2019

Some of her posts on twitter lately seem to be off the charts.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

DS86DS

Gemma O'Doherty interview with John Waters on Cultural Marxism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQXBRj_kKLg

The Nal

Thankfully her "huge" numbers of viewers for these lunatic livestreams are pathetically small. 0.04% of the population.

TaurenDruid

lbc2019 wrote: »

Whats people's problems with 5G?

5G is essentially WiFi? I wouldn't presume to know what's in the mind of Gemma (and her website doesn't actually go into detail on anything to presumably head off actual debate) but I'd guess it's a combination of "they'll use it to track you everywhere" and "the WiFi radiation will give us all autism if we haven't already got it from the vaccines!"

It's funny, when Irish Water were still trying to meter houses, we had an anti-water charges campaigner call to the door with a petition and a list of 20 reasons why we should oppose charges and meters being installed. Now, I've no problem at all with opposition to water charges, but sprinkled through the sensible and logical reasons were gems such as:

* "Smart meters will not work in the event of an EMP." I asked the campaigner if they knew what an EMP was. They didn't.

* "Radio waves from the smart meters are a form of radiation and may cause cancer." I asked if they had a smartphone, or WiFi in their house. They had both...

The Nal

5G is not wifi or 5Ghz.

5G refers to a cellular standard. ie data on your phone when youre out and about.

5Ghz (gigahertz) is a frequency on your wireless router. Most wifi and bluetooth operate on 2.4Ghz or 5Ghz. Think of it like a radio station frequency.

5G is just marketing speak for the 5th generation of cellular standard which has nothing to do with wifi operating on 5Ghz.

Gemma and the crazies are (apparently) worried that its going to fry our brains via cell tower radiation but we've had towers since 2G, for 30 years.

Shes a complete idiot.

humberklog

So she's putting forward a thesis that communists infiltrated that Catholic church in the 20's-30's and they started the sexual abuse in order to destabilise the organisation from within?

That's as far as I got.

Hotblack Desiato

humberklog wrote: »

So she's putting forward a thesis that communists infiltrated that Catholic church in the 20's-30's and they started the sexual abuse in order to destabilise the organisation from within?

That's as far as I got.

Well Pope Francis says that Satan did it, so who's crazier?

ohnonotgmail

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Well Pope Francis says that Satan did it, so who's crazier?

wow, you really do ask the hardest questions.

KikiLaRue

humberklog wrote: »

So she's putting forward a thesis that communists infiltrated that Catholic church in the 20's-30's and they started the sexual abuse in order to destabilise the organisation from within?

That's as far as I got.

Same.

Her live streams are crazy long - almost two hours. I'd imagine a lot of them are people who dip in for a minute or two like that.

humberklog

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Well Pope Francis says that Satan did it, so who's crazier?

I've posted previously that I don't think Gemma is crazy. I don't know anything about the Pope, don't care to either.

Grayson

lbc2019 wrote: »

Whats people's problems with 5G?

personally my problem is how long I'll have to wait for the rollout. And even then some how I'll be guaranteed to be living in the one spot where I won't get reception.

mzungu

DS86DS wrote: »

Gemma O'Doherty interview with John Waters on Cultural Marxism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQXBRj_kKLg

Two spoofers talking about a conspiracy theory?

Life is way to short to indulge that kind of nonsense.

The Nal

KikiLaRue wrote: »

Same.

Her live streams are crazy long - almost two hours. I'd imagine a lot of them are people who dip in for a minute or two like that.

Thats what conspiracy nutters do. With an absence of fact or proof they chuck large volumes at things hoping some of it sticks or hope it'll muddy the waters a bit.

ArmaniJeanss

The Nal wrote: »

Gemma and the crazies are (apparently) worried that its going to fry our brains via cell tower radiation but we've had towers since 2G, for 30 years.

Shes a complete idiot.

Worth pointing out to any youngsters here that back around 1993-1996 mobile phone masts was a big issue, the sort of thing where Prime Time would open with an industry expert up against some concerned citizen who wanted masts stopped until science had proven that they were 100% safe.
And usually accompanied by vox pops where people threatened to tear them down if they were put up within 500metres of schools, and didn't want them spoiling the look of their village.
So nothing really changes, it was probably the same attitude to electric poles 80 years ago.

The Nal

ArmaniJeanss wrote: »

Worth pointing out to any youngsters here that back around 1993-1996 mobile phone masts was a big issue, the sort of thing where Prime Time would open with an industry expert up against some concerned citizen who wanted masts stopped until science had proven that they were 100% safe.
And usually accompanied by vox pops where people threatened to tear them down if they were put up within 500metres of schools, and didn't want them spoiling the look of their village.
So nothing really changes, it was probably the same attitude to electric poles 80 years ago.

Yep remember the "Veronica Guerin" had 96 tumours in her ear when she died" nonsense?

Ipso

The Nal wrote: »

Yep remember the "Veronica Guerin" had 96 tumours in her ear when she died" nonsense?

Were the tumours small or the ears big?

Annasopra

The Nal wrote: »

Thankfully her "huge" numbers of viewers for these lunatic livestreams are pathetically small. 0.04% of the population.

Ah theres a lot of bots and crazy Americans there too

The Nal

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Ah theres a lot of bots and crazy Americans there too

Yeah if you look at her social media followers youll see a lot with zero content andfollowers.

Shes a national embarrassment.

Annasopra

I see Gemma deliberately lied again about the ISIS woman. How do people still fall for her absolute bull shï ttery

PopePalpatine

It's called "confirmation bias", the same reason you get drive-by posters dumping an hours-long video about how the west is doomed.

Ipso

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

I see Gemma deliberately lied again about the ISIS woman. How do people still fall for her absolute bull shï ttery

Or as George Costanza says, it’s not a lie if you believe it.
Hanlon’s razor.

lbc2019

So today she conflates a traffic accident with an attack by Isis in Sweden

An Ciarraioch

Her manifesto:

http://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1104843427261362176

The Nal

"prepare for Irexit".

lol

Can't wait to see the paltry attendance in Ashbourne later.

Pherekydes

The Nal wrote: »

"prepare for Irexit".

lol

Can't wait to see the paltry attendance in Ashbourne later.

It will be positively Trumpian. 30000 people crammed into a ballroom fit for 200 people.

Ipso

An Ciarraioch wrote: »

Her manifesto:

http://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1104843427261362176

At least it’s bi-partisan: right wing paranoia and left wing hippyism/anti corporation.

TaurenDruid

G'OD: "And I say that we should have a MEDIC-LED health service!"

*applause*

G'OD: "Turf out all the managers from the HSE!"

*rapturous applause*

G'OD: "Ban the vaccines and big pharma!"

Voice from the back: "But Gemma - it's actually medics that say vaccines save lives?!"

G'OD: "We'll TURF OUT those medics and get new ones!"

Pherekydes

An Ciarraioch wrote: »

Her manifesto:

http://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1104843427261362176

I wonder will #3 apply to her and her cronies when they take over? :rolleyes:

Ipso

Pherekydes wrote: »

I wonder will #3 apply to her and her cronies when they take over? :rolleyes:

Less of that or number 11 won’t apply to you.

SoundsRight

The red carpet we're rolling out for a Jihadi bride is like something Gemma would be accused of making up.

Arthur Daley

I was fairly sure item number 4 once mentionned 'end evictions'. Anyway, today it speaks of limiting evictions. Which is a step in the right direction. Because a world with no evictions (or threat of evictions) would be a world without private property, and in the end game it's a world of communism.