Eod100 wrote: » Bit of an explainer here on merger for anyone interested:https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/scarlets-ospreys-merger-everything-you-15924170
awec wrote: » The Pro14 should absolutely refuse to allow them to adopt this 2+2 nonsense. They should not be allowed to enter their 2 glorified A teams into a league that is already overflowing with sub standard teams.
Cookiemunster wrote: » The talk of Ospreys and Scarlets being both in favour of and behind idea of the merger doesn't really tally comments of the outgoing Ospreys chairman.
awec wrote: » This is completely different. The Ospreys were a brand new team, at a new level for the sport. What is happening now is expecting Ospreys to start supporting a team that quite literally have been their rivals for 16 years. It's like expecting Leinster fans to start supporting Munster, with Munster fans accepting the team being renamed to the Munster Blues.
CatFromHue wrote: » stop moaning about people moaning molloyjh
thomond2006 wrote: » Again, more hyperbole. Overflowing: How many teams are included within this grouping? I look at the tables and I only see three teams that are completely off the pace (Zebre, Kings and Dragons). Is 3 out of 14 overflowing?
molloyjh wrote: » Exactly. The P14 has more teams in the European QFs than any other league while at the same being objectively the most competitive league of the 3 too. And this is an attempt to improve the fortunes of the sides in it.
molloyjh wrote: » I have to be honest, I’m getting really sick of listening to people bitch and moan about the league and then go on to bitch and moan about every attempt to improve it, all the while never proposing solutions themselves. The situation in Wales was completely unsustainable, so what else where they supposed to do!? Do any of those people complaining have any ideas at all, or do they just want to crap all over everything? And people talk about Welsh moaning!?
awec wrote: » Every team doesn’t play every other team home and away, so this idea that cause a few teams hover mid table they are somehow worthwhile is a fallacy. The cheetahs are mince. The blues are mince.
AdamD wrote: » Didn't the Blues win the Challenge Cup last year? And 5 of the 8 Champions cup quarter finalists this year are Pro 14? The league is far from as bad as you make out. People over rate the English and French leagues massively.
awec wrote: » Ospreys Rugby have just released a statement saying they agree with their recently resigned chairman that this process is a farce and that they will not merge with the Scarlets, citing their history and their contributions to the national team. Good on them. Sanity might prevail if they stand their ground.
thomond2006 wrote: » What is sanity in this? The status quo isn't working either.
thomond2006 wrote: » How do you define mince? The Cheetahs made the playoffs last year. You're not making sense. What is sanity in this? The status quo isn't working either and the Ospreys' statement confirms this also.
troyzer wrote: » Yeah, it's bad enough with sub standard Leinster A teams like Ulster and Connacht.
CatFromHue wrote: » yeah 3 teams at that standard is too much, they're 21% of the league, and you have Treviso teetering on the edge of that group as well. that group is teams you expect to win very easily against and they're points difference backs that up, it's -228, -264, and -304 respectively. Newcastle in the English league are the worst team but their pd is only -103, granted they've played 2 less games. having 1 or even 2 no hoppers in the league is ok, but 3 pushing 4 with the potential for 5 is not good. not good at all.
awec wrote: » The sanity of not messing with the two most successful regions, while leaving the runt of the litter untouched. If you're drawing up a list of things in Welsh rugby that need to disappear, the Dragons have to be at the top of the list. They are a joke.
stephen_n wrote: » Ospreys are no better than Dragons anymore, they aren’t going to get any better without increased funding. That’s not going to happen, so they are going to stay sh1te.
aloooof wrote: » I think this is pretty inaccurate tbh. Ospreys currently have more than double the points Dragons do. Since the 2011/12 season when they won the Pro12, they've contested 2 semi-finals. Dragons haven't been outside the bottom 4 in all that time and haven't finished ahead of Ospreys. Then there's also the contribution to Wales, as awec mentioned. I've no idea what the solution is but it's just not correct to same they're no better than Dragons.
Jump_In_Jack wrote: » Just pointing out that there are only 12 teams in the English league. So even with 3 bad teams out of 14, Pro14 still has more good teams.