Joeface wrote: » Yeah, werent these cars meant be slower ..
Mitch Connor wrote: » So, just how worried should Merc/Hamilton fans be? They don't seem to be anywhere near the pace of others. Sure, testing is testing but still.... Merc look mid pack at the moment.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Yes but they cars would have gotten faster if the rules didn't change. And how have the tyre compounds changed? Plus wasn't last year's test mostly done during really low temperatures? I think it even showed during the test last year.
Cool_CM wrote: » Currently sipping on a can of Rich Energy waiting to go on a pitwalk. It's basically red bull!
Joeface wrote: » El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Yes but they cars would have gotten faster if the rules didn't change. And how have the tyre compounds changed? Plus wasn't last year's test mostly done during really low temperatures? I think it even showed during the test last year. Im looking at the Poll time form the SP GP last year 1:16.173 ...they are not far off that . Leclerc Ferrari 1m16.231s just now
pjohnson wrote: » The engine is obviously not being pushed but given the huge aero package changes between the first and second round of tests they themselves dont seem very happy.
Mitch Connor wrote: » Surely those massive changes would have been pre-planned - they can't have had enough time between the tests to review findings, design aero upgrades, test aero upgrades, build and deliver them? Whatever about their pace, I would have thought the car design in general terms for both tests would have been decided well in advance
pjohnson wrote: » I think they may have either been between two minds on some configuartions (or just mightnt have had some parts ready for last week) so may have planned on running the varied designs but its still not suggesting confidence such large differences.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: Cant be said often enough.
chicorytip wrote: » Nobody can seriously claim that this will not compromise his speed and overall performance.
Inviere wrote: » Anyone remember the fduct days? Blasting up Eau Rouge with one hand on the steering wheel? He'll be fine.
Inviere wrote: » chicorytip wrote: » Nobody can seriously claim that this will not compromise his speed and overall performance. Anyone remember the fduct days? Blasting up Eau Rouge with one hand on the steering wheel? He'll be fine.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » True but nobody would recommend going around a hairpin with one hand on the wheel either. It remains to be seen whether he'll be fine or not.
eviltimeban wrote: » It'd be great if Hamilton actually had to work for his championship this year...
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » True but nobody would recommend going around a hairpin with one hand on the wheel either.
It remains to be seen whether he'll be fine or not.
ppn wrote: » https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.why-mercedes-brought-such-a-heavily-revised-car-to-test-2.1LtnfYtp4oLgQVEXOCw4DH.html
mickdw wrote: » How do you get hold of paddock passes? Can they be bought cheaply for testing? 50 quid here if you can get in background of sky coverage drinking a can of rich energy!
Cool_CM wrote: » Ted is back anyway
Cool_CM wrote: » mickdw wrote: » How do you get hold of paddock passes? Can they be bought cheaply for testing? 50 quid here if you can get in background of sky coverage drinking a can of rich energy! Got 2 cans of Rich Energy and in the background of Craig Slater's report, but not at the same time. 1:06 in with the tricolour in the tricolour in the back lefthttps://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/11598703/f1-testing-day-three-second-test-ferrari-set-fastest-times-of-winter