nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Tommy Robinson jailed

[Deleted User]

Apparently according to Lauren Southern, Tommy has been sentenced to 13 months but there is a UK wide embargo on reporting.

Anyone else got any info?

Edit. Not too sure about the authenticity of the embargo. I'm assuming that it's for this https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-arrested-leeds-court-child-grooming-trial-edl-founder-latest-a8368821.html?amp

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Danzy

If it happened to any one else it would see Panorama in crisis and heads rolling.

It is the sort of crap that launched Robinson.

Industrial levels of sexual assault on girls ignored for years because they were white working class girls.

Labour didn't want to risk block votes and they were only lumpen proles anyway, the authorities didn't want to risk being labelled racists by activists, that kills careers and the activists would be their friends children, neighbours, party guests. All too awkward to bother with.

jeremyj1968

GinAndBitter wrote: »

I think it leaves a question mark over some of their exposes they have done in the past, this can't of been the first they were at this type of behaviour.

To see how much John Sweeney was coaching the witness in that really is shocking. It brings the objectivity of every Panorama that he was involved in, in to question. What is particularly sinister is where he says "we can clip that bit out" when the witness mentions something she said that would a) reflect badly on her behaviour and b) might throw a bit of proper context on the interaction. I wonder how many times has he "clipped that bit out in the past"?

Amazing how this has been absolutely buried in the mainstream. This should be a massive news story and the end of John Sweeney's career.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

GinAndBitter wrote: »

You would think panaroma would have had enough on the supposed racist monster that they wouldnt need to go trying to pay people to tell lies.

I think it leaves a question mark over some of their exposes they have done in the past, this can't of been the first they were at this type of behaviour.

You should have realised by now that when you make a statement like that, some awkward git like me is inevitable going to come along and ask the obvious questions:

What specific lies are you referring to? and: what proof do you have that they are actually lies?

GinAndBitter

ricero wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyk4

Panodrama now on Youtube for anyone interested

You would think panaroma would have had enough on the supposed racist monster that they wouldnt need to go trying to pay people to tell lies.

I think it leaves a question mark over some of their exposes they have done in the past, this can't of been the first they were at this type of behaviour.

Danzy

gw80 wrote: »

"Resisting hate, building bridges" no that's not a biased site at all.

They are on the lunatic fringe of that movement.

Have had problems with targeting Jews, homophobia etc

Really don't like Jews.

Not just your normal Labour level of Jew baiting either.

gw80

Billy86 wrote: »

Wait, Google is biased against Tommy Robinson?

"Resisting hate, building bridges" no that's not a biased site at all.

Danzy

gw80 wrote: »

I'm not a big fan of Tommy for my own reasons, but to be fair a lot of those quotes may not be even from Tommy Robinson but fake profiles, and your two links are basically just the same quotes repeated, and those sites are completely biased.

They seem to be fake profiles, different twitter handles to the ones he had that year, which were surprisingly easy to find.

His account being well monitored.

Billy86

gw80 wrote: »

I'm not a big fan of Tommy for my own reasons, but to be fair a lot of those quotes may not be even from Tommy Robinson but fake profiles, and your two links are basically just the same quotes repeated, and those sites are completely biased.

Wait, Google is biased against Tommy Robinson?

[Deleted User]

That documentary is quite good.

gw80

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

A few here

https://resistinghate.org/tommy-robinson-and-his-hate-tweets/

Few more here

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=tommy+robinson+racist+tweets&prmd=niv&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZh-e4x9zgAhVXSBUIHXHJBqwQ_AUoAnoECAwQAg&biw=360&bih=512&dpr=3

I'm not a big fan of Tommy for my own reasons, but to be fair a lot of those quotes may not be even from Tommy Robinson but fake profiles, and your two links are basically just the same quotes repeated, and those sites are completely biased.

Cienciano

Grayson wrote: »

It has a couple of examples here.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tommy-robinson-facebook-ban-instagram-permanent-far-right-edl-racism-a8797451.html

And explains that he was given a warning for his posts in January.

Tommy's MO. Break a rule on purpose. Keep doing it. Gets warned that if he does it again there's consequences. He does it again. Consequences. Tommy whines and claims to be the victim.

RWCNT

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

A few here

https://resistinghate.org/tommy-robinson-and-his-hate-tweets/

Few more here

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=tommy+robinson+racist+tweets&prmd=niv&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZh-e4x9zgAhVXSBUIHXHJBqwQ_AUoAnoECAwQAg&biw=360&bih=512&dpr=3

Those all look to be from twitter though, which he got kicked off about a year ago. Wasnt this meant to be on Fb or insta? Tbf it's possible this was done in a closed group on fb. I've been in groups before where people have got the group/their own profile taken down for sharing porn and whatnot. His fellow professional bollocks Raheem Kassan's profile was taken down and restored as well, with Fb saying it was removed in error because he was an admin in a group which violated ToS, so it's a merchantable explanation for lack of receipts.

Timberrrrrrrr

RWCNT wrote: »

I'm anti-TR and am glad he's been given the boot off social media but to be totally honest I wouldn't expect to see him posting anything that blatant nowadays Most of the far right guys know these days that you can't go around openly saying stuff like that, so you have to pose as a concerned citizen while pedalling a narrative that demonizes whatever your "other" of choice is.

I wouldn't put it past TR to get hammered and post something like that then delete it straight away, but I am surprised nobody could manage to grab a screenshot. I thought he'd been kicked for something else in all honesty and would have presumed fb insta et al would have had more than enough ammunition to do so just from his esual carryon.

A few here

https://resistinghate.org/tommy-robinson-and-his-hate-tweets/

Few more here

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=tommy+robinson+racist+tweets&prmd=niv&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZh-e4x9zgAhVXSBUIHXHJBqwQ_AUoAnoECAwQAg&biw=360&bih=512&dpr=3

RWCNT

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Yeah because posting stuff like that would be totally out of character for tommy.

I'm anti-TR and am glad he's been given the boot off social media but to be totally honest I wouldn't expect to see him posting anything that blatant nowadays Most of the far right guys know these days that you can't go around openly saying stuff like that, so you have to pose as a concerned citizen while pedalling a narrative that demonizes whatever your "other" of choice is.

I wouldn't put it past TR to get hammered and post something like that then delete it straight away, but I am surprised nobody could manage to grab a screenshot. I thought he'd been kicked for something else in all honesty and would have presumed fb insta et al would have had more than enough ammunition to do so just from his esual carryon.

ricero

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNd2bvLvyk4

Panodrama now on Youtube for anyone interested

Danzy

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Yeah but now he is not their problem any more.

If he posted the hate speech and incitement to violence that they claim he did they were right.

Well we'll just have to go along then presume they are right.

ohnonotgmail

Danzy wrote: »

That is exactly what Facebook just did.

Yeah but now he is not their problem any more.

Danzy wrote: »

Just because they are class allies for the Left doesn't mean that they were right.

If he posted the hate speech and incitement to violence that they claim he did they were right.

Danzy

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

You mean give him another excuse to claim persecution and grift from his followers for his legal expenses?

That is exactly what Facebook just did.

Just because they are class allies for the Left doesn't mean that they were right.

Snake Plisken

https://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz/status/1100460038622232576?s=19

ohnonotgmail

Call Me Jimmy wrote: »

That a man who's case is in front of the attorney general, in a country where online police surviellance is substantial, who is an enemy of the almost every journalist and anti-islamophobia group is getting away with criminality broadcast to millions of people.

You mean give him another excuse to claim persecution and grift from his followers for his legal expenses?

Danzy

Snake Plisken wrote: »

Any screenshots pal? You and the many thousands who hate him surely must have some proof?

Corporate capital has the modern Left by the bollox from anarchism to social democrats

Of all those following and monitoring Robinson, easily thousands out of his million followers, no one saw nothing. Including the police, hope not Hate, uaf etc etc.

The cry from the activists is trust capital, trust big business, ignore that lumped people, join the leafy suburb revolution, that is the modern Left.

Politics as a lifestyle.

[Deleted User]

ohnonotgmail wrote:

can you point to the post where i called you a racist?

The implication was there to see.

Your implication that I would find it acceptable for people to urge beheadings of the followers of the Koran would indicate that way.

The fact that you purposely misquoted me to make it look like I said things I didn't.

Scroll back up there. Im on a phone at the minute so it's hard to multiquote.

But anyhoo, as enjoyable as it was, I was just trying to save someone else the trouble.

Call Me Jimmy

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

what is it i am supposed to find strange?

That a man who's case is in front of the attorney general, in a country where online police surviellance is substantial, who is an enemy of the almost every journalist and anti-islamophobia group is getting away with criminality broadcast to millions of people.

Snake Plisken

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Yeah because posting stuff like that would be totally out of character for tommy.

Any screenshots pal? You and the many thousands who hate him surely must have some proof?

ohnonotgmail

Deleted User wrote: »

Don't feed the troll buddy. I got caught up earlier too. You'll just end up being called a racist

can you point to the post where i called you a racist?

[Deleted User]

Call Me Jimmy wrote:

So you don't find it strange I guess.

Don't feed the troll buddy. I got caught up earlier too. You'll just end up being called a racist

ohnonotgmail

Snake Plisken wrote: »

So it's basically a large multinational known for fabricating lies to governments and selling user information, against Robinson so excuse me if I want to see proof of the alleged posts he made.

Yeah because posting stuff like that would be totally out of character for tommy.

ohnonotgmail

Call Me Jimmy wrote: »

So you don't find it strange I guess.

what is it i am supposed to find strange?

Snake Plisken

Grayson wrote: »

It has a couple of examples here.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tommy-robinson-facebook-ban-instagram-permanent-far-right-edl-racism-a8797451.html

And explains that he was given a warning for his posts in January.

So it's basically a large multinational known for fabricating lies to governments and selling user information, against Robinson so excuse me if I want to see proof of the alleged posts he made.

Grayson

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

Well i cant show them to you as Tommy deleted them. That is not an issue for FB as they can still see them. Though i bet you're not actually curious at all and would dismiss them if i could show them to you. You dont care if he said them or not.

It has a couple of examples here.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tommy-robinson-facebook-ban-instagram-permanent-far-right-edl-racism-a8797451.html

And explains that he was given a warning for his posts in January.