Deleted User wrote: » Humour is subjective I suppose. I don't find it that funny.
sirmanga wrote: » Trump 2020, lads! The future is bright, the future is orange! Just wish we had someone with his balls in this spineless country.
Danzy wrote: » Wrong to close off a working class perspective just because one disagrees with it. Pretending it was inciting violence is just an excuse.
Danzy wrote: » Wrong to close off a working class perspective just because one disagrees with it.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » No pretending required. He was inciting violence. Which is against FB policy. And he was previously warned about his posts but decided to keep breaking that policy regardless. What should FB have done? Do you think they should have allowed him to incite hatred and violence?
Grayson wrote: » On twitter all the right wingers are going nuts saying that facebook lets terrorist accounts exist but close tommy/stephen. Show them a link that says facebook is deleting thousands of accounts and they switch the topic to "yeah, but has be broken the law" It doesn't actually matter what facts are, people like that only care about how they feel. Pointing out facts should make most people step back and question what they were saying, but it doesn't.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » They all relate to specific posts of tommys. Or do you think that FB just made them up? Do you think that he did not post the things that FB mentioned?
ancapailldorcha wrote: » It's not a working class perspective. Yaxley-Lennon has nothing in common with the working class.
Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » 'Can't win a debate about Tommy Robinson or the virtues of the right? I know! I'll bring up Trump!' Just when I thought "the right wants to live their lives" was going to be the stupidest thing I'd read today...
rgossip30 wrote: » I am just curious as to what specific posts are offensive .Can you show a link ?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Well i cant show them to you as Tommy deleted them. That is not an issue for FB as they can still see them. Though i bet you're not actually curious at all and would dismiss them if i could show them to you. You dont care if he said them or not.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Yeah, tommy is a great lad. Not in the least bit far right.
Snake Plisken wrote: » Provide a screen shot where Tommy said those things like a good lad, I look forward to you and the Boards Antifa crew posting the screen grabs thanks in advance!
Call Me Jimmy wrote: » The police missed them, panorama missed them, his enemies missed them which includes activist organisations whose sole purpose is to expose and fight against 'hate', islamophobia etc. and who would have known all you had to do was go to his facebook page with 1 million + subscribers to find evidence of crimes that could have gotten him not only banned but put in jail. The crime had so many victims that not one of them saw it.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » FB didnt miss them. and it is them that makes the rules for what appears on their site.
Grayson wrote: » It has a couple of examples here.https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tommy-robinson-facebook-ban-instagram-permanent-far-right-edl-racism-a8797451.html And explains that he was given a warning for his posts in January.
Call Me Jimmy wrote: » So you don't find it strange I guess.
Snake Plisken wrote: » So it's basically a large multinational known for fabricating lies to governments and selling user information, against Robinson so excuse me if I want to see proof of the alleged posts he made.
Call Me Jimmy wrote: So you don't find it strange I guess.
Deleted User wrote: » Don't feed the troll buddy. I got caught up earlier too. You'll just end up being called a racist
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Yeah because posting stuff like that would be totally out of character for tommy.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » what is it i am supposed to find strange?