wingsof daun wrote: » We should not let our emotions control our thoughts on this terrible event. It should be blatantly obvious that mental illness was the complete driving force here. I highly doubt if it was a woman who done the same thing to her family there would be the same hatred directed towards her. In this twisted modern world, a woman would get more consolation and less hatred if it were her that resorted to murder of her family. It is so easy nowadays to target men, and in America it's a racial hatred of white men that seems to be all too common.
political analyst wrote: » It's already out - he was caught "pleasuring himself" and watching porn on a computer at the school. It's possible that data protection law prevents the authorities from releasing information about Alan Hawe without permission from his parents and brothers.
Trump Is Right wrote: » Mental illness like this, can be so hard to spot in your average everyday person. Society does not want to acknowledge that we have people like Alan Hawe in our communities, silently suffering and struggling to keep themselves from going over the edge. There is a deep outrage even at the suggestion that this was mental illness. But why is that? Whatever condition Alan Hawe was clearly suffering from, should be no direct reflection on any other unrelated mental illness... there are many different types, and thankfully most people suffering from mental illness will never do what this man sadly did. But the longer society tries to brush these types of mental illness under the carpet as some simplistic "act of evil".... the longer it will take to find solutions and help prevent the next Alan Hawe! Simply labelling someone as "evil" does nothing to help the situation (even if that is perhaps a natural human emotional reaction to this tragedy). This sort of line of thinking, is more suited to back in the bad old days of catholic Ireland... where we had "good" and "evil"... and everything else was dismissed as nonsense!
freshpopcorn wrote: » She said since his death she became aware he was wearing Clodaghs underwear and she said that Clodagh in her wildest dreams would have thought of that.
tretorn wrote: » He picked up a hatchet and murdered his defenceless wife with it. He was a very goid hand ball player in his youth so would have been strong enough to over power Clodagh easily, why use a hatchet and a knife, to me this meant rage. He was a monster, there is no other word for such evil and counselling is never going to help her mother and sister recover. He took their lives too.
Hoboo wrote: » Finally an intelligent and informed post. Kudos. Unfortunately the masses really don't understand the complexities of mental health and the diverse and vast range of illnesses, symptoms and outcomes. How a GP is meant to simply spot depression without the patient discussing it is beyond me. He could have been going to the GP for years for anything, and pretending to be fine. I think the family would be better served receiving counselling themselves, not sure they'll get any kind of closure otherwise.
retro:electro wrote: » Like her sister said, he killed her like he hated her. An absolute monster. What makes me sad is the fact she was looking up holidays on the computer at the time, blissfully unaware about what was about to happen as she projects herself into the images in front of her of people sunning themselves and laughing. What a coward he was. And I’m also happy that there was no references to him being a “GAA man” and “a pillar of the community”, more shlte that flooded the media in the aftermath, as if that makes any difference. He was a calculated, controlling and abusive bully who was so up his own fcuking arse he thought his family couldn’t manage without him. He should have killed himself only and done them a favour.
Mrsmum wrote: » I don't think he hated her. I think he didn't see her as important at all, which is more insulting actually. Yes, 2nd bolded just about sums it up.
Mrsmum wrote: » Regarding the mum and sister, really and truly every single detail should be made available to them as they are the victims now. I don't understand who it serves (besides him but he's a murderer and anyway is dead) to keep stuff from them, even if only so they would not perhaps fill a vacuum by concentrating on the wrong details. It mist be insufferable for them to feel there is details of the story of their loved ones deaths that they are being kept in the dark about.
bubblypop wrote: » It's human nature to try to make sense of a tragedy like this. Clodaghs family are searching for an answer they will never get. They will never find out why he did it, because there isn't a reason why. There is no justification & no way to figure it out. So, yes they want details they assume are there that they don't have, they won't answer the question though. He committed unbelievably selfish, violent & heartbreaking murders, the only answer to 'why' is in his head. I feel terribly sorry for her family, & his, they lost everything too, I hope they are all receiving the counselling & help they need.
iamwhoiam wrote: » It took 18 months for the letter to be shown to them ! The letter that was written for their eyes . Now that is disgraceful in my opinion . They are two dignified woman seeking information that might help ease their torment and no one seems to be listening . Shameful behavour
JMNolan wrote: » Mrsmum wrote: » Regarding the mum and sister, really and truly every single detail should be made available to them as they are the victims now. I don't understand who it serves (besides him but he's a murderer and anyway is dead) to keep stuff from them, even if only so they would not perhaps fill a vacuum by concentrating on the wrong details. It mist be insufferable for them to feel there is details of the story of their loved ones deaths that they are being kept in the dark about. In my dealings with the state there are two reasons why they keep information from peopleCover up/protect themselves from scrutiny or legal action Blind bureaucracy