The Nal wrote: » 18 years later and not one conspirator has been uncovered. Because there werent any.
King Mob wrote: » https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection But again, you are completely ignorant of science. I don't believe your "evidence". No one does. But why? Which part of the floor and roof? Why did it collapse before the "simultaneous" explosions?
Dohnjoe wrote: » Here is a demolitions expert from the largest demolition companies in the world on the subject. Bonus: Richard Gage (911 conspiracy theorist) appears and suggests that explosives could have been planted when the building was built in the 80'shttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIIWbEgESJY A futile exercise for you, but this is for others reading this thread
Cheerful Spring wrote: » You just highlighted why the debunkers brain needs to be studied.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Real evidence. Truthers have a genuine slide belonging to UGS. It was a slide of molybdenum sphere (melted in the dust) The temp to melt molybdenum is 2600 Celsius. I don't care what you believe this evidence is readily available online and talked about.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » It did not collapse before explosions. The explosion boom/echo was heard on video before the Penthouse collapsed,.
King Mob wrote: » His reaction for Gage's bananas notion is perfect.
The Nal wrote: » Amazing that some people think they wired buildings and no one noticed. Mentally ill behaviour.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Who going to notice you watch too many movies? Do you think professionals are just going to walk in with boxes marked with a demolition sign? Yes, they could have gone unnoticed. All the needed was clearance to bypass security the rest is easy.
King Mob wrote: » More projection. It's sad and pathetic. But again, you are completely ignorant about science and you have a child's level of reading comprehension. So rational people simply don't believe your interpretation of complicated scientific topics like the above. You are a child trying to pretend to be a scientist. You are either 12 years old, or you are someone who has never taken a single science class. Yet you pretend to be informed. No one is falling for it. Be honest cheerful, which is it? Ok, so if it collapsed after the explosions, why did it collapse before the rest of the building? You again contradict your own claims because you either don't read what you write or you don't know what words like "simultaneous" mean. Or again, a combination of both.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » This coming from someone who believes in the invisible man. The utter stupidity. Anyone with a good eye could see was just a camera or video artefact. Never mind you claimed steel is not mostly Iron. And we had a long debate about this nonsense.
King Mob wrote: » Lol, and now deflection again. Pathetic. But it's ok. You've shredded any respectability conspiracy theorists here might have. You've done far more damage than any of us "debunkers."
Cheerful Spring wrote: » I just proved your ridiculous claims wrong
Cheerful Spring wrote: » I not just highlighting your stupidity. The invisible man is real according to you:)
Cheerful Spring wrote: » By the way, the debunkers were convinced this was a real person even attacked me for it? They also denied this could be liquid the Firefighters saw flowing in the rubble ( molten steel)
King Mob wrote: » Lol, again with this. No one buys your obviously bull**** explanation of that picture. It's one of your sillier, most hilarious claims, yet you are posting it to an audience of no one as if it is a gotcha. Pathetic.
Dohnjoe wrote: » It's impossible to rig a building that size in secret according to a world leading demolitions expert It took them months to rig a building far smaller than either of the WTC towers Look at the video, they have to cut beams, they have to plant hundreds of charges, miles upon miles of detonation cable, they have to gut the entire building. Not one piece of detonation cord or wire was discovered afterwards
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » He will start with his massive mirror/glass next that somehow magically survived. He has obviously never seen or been close to the twin towers and just scatters idiotic suggestions at a rate of knots.
King Mob wrote: » Lol the crayon drawings are back. That'll make him look sane, adult and respectable.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » When you believe an invisible man and stick man can exist. I had to use crayon drawings for you to notice;)
The Nal wrote: » How did they wire the buildings without anyone noticing - not seeing the wiring or hearing the demolition during wiring - and why were there no bits of wires and charges and so on found?
Cheerful Spring wrote: » You don't need to wire the building, You can set off charges remotely by wireless/radio receiver connection. This a myth that you can only do it one way. The wires would be located behind walls whos going to see them? I already explained to you a company was doing renovations and upgrading elevators for years. Drilling and noise would be heard, it would not be suspicious to someone hearing it. It not like they were in a rush the had months to prepare maybe even year. You don't find explosives after they are used? You verify explosives by taking residue samples and checking the chemistry.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » This is photographic evidence of a lava-like liquid near the steel columns. You deny the evidence.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » You don't need to wire the building, You can set off charges remotely by wireless/radio receiver connection. This a myth that you can only do it one way. The wires would be located behind walls whos going to see them? I already explained to you a company was doing renovations and upgrading elevators for years. Drilling and noise would be heard, it would not be suspicious to someone hearing it. It not like they were in a rush the had months to prepare maybe even year. .
Dohnjoe wrote: » For other readers It's a 911 worker cutting steel with a thermitic lance or acetylene torchhttp://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911/index.php%3Fmodule%3Dpagemaster%26PAGE_user_op%3Dview_printable%26PAGE_id%3D84%26lay_quiet%3D1 Watch the below, skip to 2 minutes in where the steel is being cut, and pause for effect to produce "river of molten steel"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GniL4-sf6X4 The below was presented by truthers as firemen discovering "molten steel" It's a (manipulated) photo of firemen around a light, the original version below Below was presented as "evidence" of molten metal The real image It was burning paper
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Second picture. Where did it come from? Lighting has changed in the second picture.
It's is molten you can see a piece of steel that folded in half? What you even talking saying it just paper?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)
