Meursault wrote: » That would actually be awesome. It’s a big ugly eyesore, as is. I don’t think it would cost too much to give it a lick of paint. If they went with a huge “This is Cork” message, all the better
Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo wrote: » I'd like for R&H Hall to be painted completely red, with a big 'This is Cork' written on all the sides of it. Or maybe the Cork crest put on it and white background.
marno21 wrote: » Sisk appointed for Crows Nest student accommodation developmenthttps://twitter.com/CISireland/status/1098929264269946880
Tomtom364 wrote: » I predict either a) Delay b) Budget blown or c) Both.
SleetAndSnow wrote: » But this is SISK, Not BAM
Tomtom364 wrote: » *Cough* PUC *Cough*
TheChizler wrote: » When someone on the govering body gets handed a major part of the contract we can start making that comparison...
marno21 wrote: » Sisk appointed for Crows Nest student accommodation development
who_me wrote: » That area is going to be very built-up in the next few years. The development above has 3 10 floor towers and one shorter (8 maybe?). The Coca Cola site development - if built - is even bigger, and the County Hall in between.
AugustusMinimus wrote: » As it’s student apartments you’d imagine I wouldn’t attract much extra traffic thankfully.
who_me wrote: » Hah, not too sure any more. Last time I was out in CIT things had changed dramatically since I studied there. The student carpark is huge - back in my day hardly anyone I knew there had a car.
Curb Your Enthusiasm wrote: » Yep. I'm currently studying there and loads drive, mostly due to the fact that the 205 is rubbish and completely unreliable. You'd be waiting 40+ mins somedays for a supposed 15-min frequency service, and 4 buses turn up together in a convoy. Such a shame because it adds massively to the already bad traffic jams there each morning and evening.
Cork City Planning wrote: Permission for alterations to 4 no. residential over ground floor blocks containing 216 no. 'Build-to-Rent' units as permitted under TP 17/37763 as part of the redevelopment of a site at Horgan's Quay, Railway Street, Lower Glanmire Road, Cork as a mixed use development. The proposed alterations include modifications to the internal and external configuration of the permitted residential development to provide for a single conventional apartment building ranging in height from 7 to 10m floors over ground floor and which is an increase in height from the 6 to 10 floors over ground floor permitted. At ground floor level, changes will include the relocation of the cre to the corner of Railway Street and Alfred Street and an increase in its size from 189m2 to 206m2, reduction in the area afforded to ancillary ESB Station, switch rooms, meter rooms, and ancillary service areas to accommodate an increase in facilities management and ancillary amenities for the residents of 400m2, reorganisation, relocation and increase in area of the 5 no. retail units from 1,139m2 to 1,265m2. The alterations to the ground floor also make provision for a decrease in the number of parking spaces and for the increase and relocation of bicycle parking. At upper levels it is proposed to amalgamate the 4 no. residential blocks into a single apartment building and internal alterations will result in an increase of 86 no. apartments to a total of 302 apartments. Alterations to the Old Railway Station (Station Master's Building) includes its refurbishment, partial demolition and change of use to provide for ancillary amenities for the residents of the residential building. The proposed development consists of the carrying out of works to a protected structure (PS178) Old Railway Station (Station Master's Building).
Apogee wrote: » Cork City Planning wrote: Permission for alterations to 4 no. residential over ground floor blocks containing 216 no. 'Build-to-Rent' units as permitted under TP 17/37763 as part of the redevelopment of a site at Horgan's Quay, Railway Street, Lower Glanmire Road, Cork as a mixed use development. The proposed alterations include modifications to the internal and external configuration of the permitted residential development to provide for a single conventional apartment building ranging in height from 7 to 10m floors over ground floor and which is an increase in height from the 6 to 10 floors over ground floor permitted. At ground floor level, changes will include the relocation of the cre to the corner of Railway Street and Alfred Street and an increase in its size from 189m2 to 206m2, reduction in the area afforded to ancillary ESB Station, switch rooms, meter rooms, and ancillary service areas to accommodate an increase in facilities management and ancillary amenities for the residents of 400m2, reorganisation, relocation and increase in area of the 5 no. retail units from 1,139m2 to 1,265m2. The alterations to the ground floor also make provision for a decrease in the number of parking spaces and for the increase and relocation of bicycle parking. At upper levels it is proposed to amalgamate the 4 no. residential blocks into a single apartment building and internal alterations will result in an increase of 86 no. apartments to a total of 302 apartments. Alterations to the Old Railway Station (Station Master's Building) includes its refurbishment, partial demolition and change of use to provide for ancillary amenities for the residents of the residential building. The proposed development consists of the carrying out of works to a protected structure (PS178) Old Railway Station (Station Master's Building). http://planning.corkcity.ie/AppFileRefDetails/1938265/0
Rhys Essien wrote: » @snotboogie Hopefully this whole block will sell in the new year and add to the list of major developments.https://www.myhome.ie/commercial/brochure/moores-hotel-morrisons-quay-cork-city-cork/4275730
questionmark? wrote: » I think many of them actually believe that Glanmire is rural. Can't accept they don't live in a village any more.
opus wrote: » That development seems to have been refused permission very quickly given how slowly the wheels turn for others.Midleton's Ballinacurra development refused planning
opus wrote: » Spotted the 'Sale Agreed' sign on the block today, looking forward to seeing what gets built there. Given the state of the old Moores Hotel, it's unlikely to be worse!
questionmark? wrote: » 86 extra apartments to 302 total, increase in size for retail units, decrease in parking, increase in bike parking. All sounds good and suitable for that site.
