Messi19 wrote: » Seen that. Was looking for the whole ep. Thanks anyway
TheChrisD wrote: » r/uktvland (run by u/cherzo) might have it soon Otherwise, we're completely out of luck until VM decide to get the latest series and eventually get around to showing it.
Purple Mountain wrote: » You know the thread here about someone unusual you fancy? Well.. Mark Labbett is mine!
pleas advice wrote: » anyone notice an increase of questions regarding women lately, its almost like theres an agenda behind it. You'd notice it on University Challenge sometimes (where there was a definite push for it), and I started noticing it on Pointless aswell, questions that were obviously included to fill a quota... but there was one tonight on the chase which took the biscuit, something along the lines of 'name the family of aviation pioneers, whose sister Katherine sometimes helped'
"They are trying very hard to strike a better balance between questions that refer to men and questions that refer to women," she says. She acknowledges this is hard because men have traditionally had the freedom to achieve more, and their achievements are more well known. Alan Connor - question editor on Richard Osman's House of Games - agrees. "When you write a question you turn to the reference books and they tend to privilege the stuff that men have done," he says.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Did ye see todays show? The Dark Destroyer lost on the last question because he answered 6 instead of 6 million!
Tom Mann Centuria wrote: » Did he try, or was he doing a Shaun special? I like him, but he does take a dive periodically.
pleas advice wrote: » maybe he didn't hear the question fully, I know I didnt. anyway, what are the chances of, in a colony of 1,000,000 ants, not one of them being missing a leg?
Deleted User wrote: » The thing that annoys me about the chase is the descriptions of the chasers, or how inaccurate they are. Constant references to Paul Sinha being smug when he's quite the opposite. Mark Le Bett is, or was at least very smug. So is the governess. That and the constant references to how "hot" the vixen is. It feels very forced. If Rachel Riley was on would they be constantly reminding people she is hot?
Deleted User wrote: » That and the constant references to how "hot" the vixen is. It feels very forced. If Rachel Riley was on would they be constantly reminding people she is hot?
Go Harvey Go wrote: » The Sinnerman has been diagnosed with Parkinson's. https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-48640653 All the very best to him in the months and years to come.
pavb2 wrote: » That lad Danny was excellent yesterday 20 all by himself lost by 2 seconds if any of the other contestants had got back they would have won by virtue of the extra point. He’s one of the best If not the best contestant I’ve seen. The chaser did have some easy questions though the one about the Sopranos and the “radio soap opera” is always going to be the Archershttps://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1243574/The-Chase-ITV-viewers-stunned-lone-contestant-huge-score-ITV-video I do recall a London chap though who was very quick had a nickname. Who is the best chaser though?
Deleted User wrote: » Agree that kid was brilliant. I did think that Bradders was taking his time asking the Chaser his questions! They’re all great quizzers, but I think Jenny is hard to beat v
Beat The Chasers is a brand new prime time spin on ITV’s smash-hit quiz show The Chase, challenging contestants to take on two, three, four or all five Chasers at once. Hosted by Bradley Walsh, this nail-biting 5-part series will be stripped across a week, starring all five of the nation's favourite quiz geniuses: Mark ‘The Beast’ Labbett, Anne ‘The Governess’ Hegerty, Paul ‘The Sinnerman’ Sinha, Jenny ‘The Vixen’ Ryan and Shaun ‘The Dark Destroyer’ Wallace. Bradley will call contestants down from the studio audience to compete. In the Cash Builder they’ll face five multiple choice questions, with the chance to bank up to £5,000. But get the first question wrong - they’re out! Next, contestants are given the option of playing between two and all five Chasers for increasing amounts of money, but with a decreasing time advantage against them. As the money goes up, so does the number of Chasers they must face. But those brave enough to take on all five Chasers could walk away with a huge cash prize. Play sees questions swap from contestant to the Chasers. But get a question wrong and their individual or team clock keeps counting down until a question is answered correctly. First to run out of time loses the game.