An Ciarraioch wrote: » The first poll gives a virtual repeat of 1983: Con 363 Lab 164 SNP 43 IG 41 NI 18 Lib Dem 16 Plaid Cymru 4 Green 1
An Ciarraioch wrote: » Update - 3% from both Tories and Lib Dems, 7% Labour, 1% presumably Other:http://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1098196101042196482
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » With those kind of figures the tories could romp home in the next GE. I don’t think the IG will take a labour seat but they could split the vote to allow tories win in any constituency. May has effectively been saved.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » So let’s see if any Tory voters defect in the polls. I expect not.
prawnsambo wrote: » Well you saw the tweets and retweets from Labour Youth. Pretty much the exact issue. Conflating somebody's Jewishness with hatred of Palestine or support for Israeli government policy.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » Do people say that? I've seen a fair amount of criticism of Corbyn and others conflating criticism of Israel with anti-semitism. In fact Ryan's resignation speech mentioned Israel. as in "And I cannot remain a member of the Labour party while this requires me to suggest that I believe Jeremy Corbyn – a man who has presided over the culture of anti-Jewish racism and hatred for Israel which now afflicts my former party – is fit to be Prime Minister of this country. He is not."
prawnsambo wrote: » No. And this is what I think is part of the disingenuous narrative around Israel and anti-semitism. Supporting the rights of Palestine and the Palestinian people and directly or indirectly condemning Israeli government policy is fine. But then the water gets muddied by people calling on Jewish people in the UK or the HoC to condemn Israel crosses that line. Because it's a bit like saying that Muslims who have lived all their lives in Ireland or the UK, should somehow be required to condemn Isamic fundamentalism, because y'know, they're the same thing until proven otherwise.
hill16bhoy wrote: » Deselection can only apply at the end of a term though and people have also been calling that Orwellian, when it really isn't. I don't agree that a party should be able to "own" a seat, but public discontent at somebody changing sides is understandable. In Ireland, Stephen Donnelly is a good case in point. I don't believe he should have been forced to resign his seat and seek re-election in a by-election however, no more than I did when he and Roisin Shortall and Catherine Murphy formed the Social Democrats.
lawred2 wrote: » Is it noteworthy that the defectors are all women?
lawred2 wrote: » Are these numbers of defectors big enough to make any difference?
robinph wrote: » I thought Con+DUP only gave a majority of 2? So only needed one to jump ship to tip the balance.
prawnsambo wrote: » But recall elections only go as far as state level. And the rules differ from state to state. Some have to pass judicial scrutiny. As for primaries, they are part of the elction process and therefore can only remove a sitting representative at the end of their term. Pretty much what can happen here or in the UK. Although it's very rare that a sitting TD would be removed from a constituency prior to an election. But it is possible. It may be a stretch to call it Orwellian, but I'm thinking of the pledge that's been going around social media recently as well. But the real issue is the notion that a party can 'own' a seat and therefore decide who sits in it and now is looking to increase that power to remove dissenters from them is stretching democracy to breaking point.
prawnsambo wrote: » No mention of them joining The Independent Group that I've seen yet, but their Twitter account is now following the three of them, so maybe they are.
Harry Palmr wrote: » It's really exiting (god I'm a nerd)
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » Defined by capitalists or indeed modernists when they deal with economic growth since the capitalist era.
I doubt that graph,
This is all good stuff, but was all driven by and large by leftwing ideologies.
I think that Brexit is lunacy,
He has imposed Tariffs yes..
in fact there is a growing body of economic position that globalisation hasn't worked,
“Over the last 25 years, more than a billion people have lifted themselves out of extreme poverty, and the global poverty rate is now lower than it has ever been in recorded history. This is one of the greatest human achievements of our time,” World Bank Group President Jim Yong Kim said
prawnsambo wrote: » Aaaaand they're off.