tuxy wrote: » Peter Casey has accecpted the invitation to be a guest in travision. Casey is painful to listen to too so at least they have that common ground!
Kivaro wrote: » You mean a serious accident like the ones that we see staged all over the country by travellers? You know, the accidents where we have to pay ludicrous insurance premiums in order to pay for these scams.
Effects wrote: » Her mother had a serious accident and had a claim as a result. At least that's as much as I can remember.
tretorn wrote: » How does a traveller amass a fortune like that. What did her mother work at.
Sweet.Science wrote: » Fortune teller. All off the books .
Sweet.Science wrote: » Shes wasting her time on FB - twitter is where all the liberals are at.
Paddy Cow wrote: » Margaret has 7 kids. She believes in her "culture". What are the chances of her daughter finishing secondary school?
Deebles McBeebles wrote: » Open to correction on this but I think it kicks in when one of the kids turn 18. Its to replace the children's allowance.
Boom_Bap wrote: » So she lied in court is what you are saying. EDIT: and used her children as an excuse in this lie
Dante7 wrote: » Fair point. I wonder was it suspended at the time of the mother's will. I'm trying to work out the benefits of leaving the leaving the estate in trust until she was 35. Getting a council house sprang to mind, as trust fund would not be reckonable.
Odelay wrote: » Are the judges waiting for him to kill someone?
KrustyUCC wrote: » Don't know if it's a record but that 35 convictions a year since 2001
gerrybbadd wrote: » What's scary in this whole thing is, she has 7 kids. 7 people that, in a few years, will be doing the same shouting for houses that she is - she's setting the example. And you can be guaranteed that these 7 will have 7 children of their own each. 49 people looking for houses. It's like bacteria
tuxy wrote: » Has she given up on facebook or perhaps realised she was doing more harm to her case than good with all the public posts? I'll give everyone something else to readhttps://www.thesun.ie/news/3764209/irelands-dumbest-criminals-stole-car-tracking/ is 644 convictions a record?
Yoghurt87 wrote: » Interesting comments from the defendant when he was charged:https://www.clarepeople.com/2018/03/08/fk-you-alleged-hijackers-reply-to-new-charge/amp/
Paddy Cow wrote: » Margaret has 7 kids. She believes in her "culture". What are the chances of her daughter finishing secondary school? If she gets her forever home in Tallaght, she is teaching those kids that you don't need to work to get ahead, you just need to fill out some forms and SHOUT SHOUT SHOUT. If all 7 of those kids end up on welfare/housing list and each goes on to have 7 more kids, who on earth is going to pay for all this? Obviously they'll all want houses in Tallaght because that's where Mammy is and it would go against their human rights/culture to break up the family. It's absolute madness.
normanoffside wrote: » Poor old Bernard can't catch a break. Not even pavee point will hire him
normanoffside wrote: » Poor old Bernard can't catch a break. Not even pavee point will hire him Originally Posted by Bernard Sweeney An Traveller only organisation that is hired Settled people, excludes Travellers, will to pay the Settled people where the Traveller business was doing it for free. You know who you are and I wish you all the best....bit disappointed when you share your vision with people and you include them in all aspects of it. Then they just stopped engaging and that's ok...only to learn that their Traveller organisation is working with the first "Traveller only organisation", ....and just like that, "they" are doing the "podcasting" and podcasting for the event. Supporting the Traveller only business isn't good enough, because they are worry about "data protection" at a public event!, and clearly gave not much legal sense!. When it comes supporting Travellers, for whom you, who gets paid to do whatever about your passion to do good in the world etc etc. You guys who gets paid to support Travellers go away and hire Settled people?, where TraVision was going to do it for free. Our non funded Traveller business that seems to stand in contradiction as to why you're getting paid in the first place.....hiring more members of the settled community isn't what you are getting paid for. TraVision isn't just idea. Sindy Joyce Martin Ward TJ Hogan Julia Reilly Padraig McLoughlin Martin Collins Is this what we are fighting for?. Bernard Sweeney Irish Traveller
Originally Posted by Bernard Sweeney An Traveller only organisation that is hired Settled people, excludes Travellers, will to pay the Settled people where the Traveller business was doing it for free. You know who you are and I wish you all the best....bit disappointed when you share your vision with people and you include them in all aspects of it. Then they just stopped engaging and that's ok...only to learn that their Traveller organisation is working with the first "Traveller only organisation", ....and just like that, "they" are doing the "podcasting" and podcasting for the event. Supporting the Traveller only business isn't good enough, because they are worry about "data protection" at a public event!, and clearly gave not much legal sense!. When it comes supporting Travellers, for whom you, who gets paid to do whatever about your passion to do good in the world etc etc. You guys who gets paid to support Travellers go away and hire Settled people?, where TraVision was going to do it for free. Our non funded Traveller business that seems to stand in contradiction as to why you're getting paid in the first place.....hiring more members of the settled community isn't what you are getting paid for. TraVision isn't just idea. Sindy Joyce Martin Ward TJ Hogan Julia Reilly Padraig McLoughlin Martin Collins Is this what we are fighting for?. Bernard Sweeney Irish Traveller
Abba987 wrote: » 100000 is a lot of months rent
Abba987 wrote: » Well whatever's happened it's all gone very quiet since nobody supported her protest#4242;
Sweet.Science wrote: » People think she is just sitting there waiting to be handed a mansion. She said numerous times she would take a 3 bed house and the council havent done anything. She also said numerous times she has no problem paying rent.
Sweet.Science wrote: » Why should she have to rent privately ? She doesnt work yet has to find money from somewhere to line the pockets of a landlord. Only in this country. She is raising kids the least the government could do is provide a house for her to do it in.
tuxy wrote: » And her other 38 previous convictions?
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Tenant purchase scheme has been suspended for the last several years and there is no plans to reintroduce it anytime soon.