nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Margaret Cash steals €300 worth of clothes from Penneys and aftermath/etc!

jjmcclure

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/homeless-mumofseven-margaret-cash-appears-in-court-over-stealing-300-worth-of-clothes-from-penneys-37434491.html

Where are RTE now?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Sweet.Science

punisher5112 wrote: »

I wouldn't even bother replying to some of the most thickest of posts on here....

She wasn't contributing her part of the hap payment, signed on homeless so she won't have to ever pay again.

Why should she have to rent privately ? She doesnt work yet has to find money from somewhere to line the pockets of a landlord. Only in this country. She is raising kids the least the government could do is provide a house for her to do it in.

TitianGerm

Sweet.Science wrote: »

She was selfless and put motherhood before her career. Can only be applauded.

I just spat tea everywhere.... Career :pac:

ohnonotgmail

Sweet.Science wrote: »

She was selfless and put motherhood before her career. Can only be applauded.

what career would that be? She certainly did not put childhood before her criminal career.

qo2cj1dsne8y4k

Sweet.Science wrote: »

She was selfless and put motherhood before her career. Can only be applauded.

You had me going at the start, I’ll give you that

eviltwin

Sweet.Science wrote: »

She was selfless and put motherhood before her career. Can only be applauded.

Too much mate, too much

Stationmaster

Sweet.Science wrote: »

She was selfless and put motherhood before her career. Can only be applauded.

Has to be a strong early contender for post of the year.....

Kivaro

Sweet.Science wrote: »

She is on record stating she has no issue paying €30 a week

Her criminal record?

dan1895

Sweet.Science wrote: »

She was selfless and put motherhood before her career. Can only be applauded.

That's the stupidest thing I've ever read

hynesie08

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

what career would that be? She certainly did not put childhood before her criminal career.

Taxi driver, that's why her convictions don't count, it was work experience.....

Sweet.Science

If people knew the ins and out of that Penneys incident their minds would change

hynesie08

Sweet.Science wrote: »

If people knew the ins and out of that Penneys incident their minds would change

Enlighten us so?

Boom_Bap

Sweet.Science wrote: »

If people knew the ins and out of that Penneys incident their minds would change

She was framed

sligojoek

Sweet.Science wrote: »

It is expected from them and in now way surprising. Its their looney sympathisers that are the problem.

Oh the irony.

Sweet.Science

She arrived into the store and her cousin ( who she doesnt speak to anymore ) asked for a hand carrying bags to her car. When they left the shop security approached and she only found out then there was stolen goods in the bag.

I know people will choose not to believe me

eviltwin

Sweet.Science wrote: »

If people knew the ins and out of that Penneys incident their minds would change

What do you mean by that?

Boom_Bap

Sweet.Science wrote: »

She arrived into the store and her cousin ( who she doesnt speak to anymore ) asked for a hand carrying bags to her car. When they left the shop security approached and she only found out then there was stolen goods in the bag.

I know people will choose not to believe me

but but but, hasn't she already admitted to stealing the clothes because her children were cold?

HeidiHeidi

Sweet.Science wrote: »

She arrived into the store and her cousin ( who she doesnt speak to anymore ) asked for a hand carrying bags to her car. When they left the shop security approached and she only found out then there was stolen goods in the bag.

I know people will choose not to believe me

And who told you that, pray?

And you chose to believe them?

Plumbthedepths

hynesie08 wrote:

Enlighten us so?

Ahh don't encourage them.

Ush1

Those clothes were only resting in her account, I mean bag.

Sweet.Science

Boom_Bap wrote: »

but but but, hasn't she already admitted to stealing the clothes because her children were cold?

She may have fallen out with her cousin but she is hardly going to snitch on her. Come on .

Boom_Bap

Sweet.Science wrote: »

She may have fallen out with her cousin but she is hardly going to snitch on her. Come on .

So she lied in court is what you are saying.

EDIT: and used her children as an excuse in this lie

ohnonotgmail

Sweet.Science wrote: »

She arrived into the store and her cousin ( who she doesnt speak to anymore ) asked for a hand carrying bags to her car. When they left the shop security approached and she only found out then there was stolen goods in the bag.

I know people will choose not to believe me

the court didnt believe her either.

tuxy

Sweet.Science wrote: »

She may have fallen out with her cousin but she is hardly going to snitch on her. Come on .

And her other 38 previous convictions?

punisher5112

Oh this is getting better.....

Framed.....

Putting Childers and angle before career.....

I wonder is this why her convictions are less as they would be if she were working as a thief like the husband.

eviltwin

Sweet.Science wrote: »

She arrived into the store and her cousin ( who she doesnt speak to anymore ) asked for a hand carrying bags to her car. When they left the shop security approached and she only found out then there was stolen goods in the bag.

I know people will choose not to believe me

Course that's what happened....

The woman would steal anything not nailed down given half the chance.

And none of this has anything to do with her getting a house.

normanoffside

Come on lads he’s only having a laugh.

gerrybbadd

Sweet.Science wrote: »

If people knew the ins and out of that Penneys incident their minds would change

I know the ins and outs.

She went in empty handed, and walked out with a load of stolen loot

Sweet.Science

eviltwin wrote: »

Course that's what happened....

The woman would steal anything not nailed down given half the chance.

And none of this has anything to do with her getting a house.

I agree. Bygones be bygones. It was actually a big turnout outside SDCC considering the short notice. But i suspect there will be a media blackout hiding the truth

Credit Checker Moose

Whatever.

gerrybbadd

Sweet.Science wrote: »

I agree. Bygones be bygones. It was actually a big turnout outside SDCC considering the short notice. But i suspect there will be a media blackout hiding the truth

What truth is that now? Like the "Truth" she told the judge about robbing half of penney's stock?