ED E wrote: » If its that dramatic it sounds like cell breathing. A cell that covers 10km during the day may drop to 8km once full to spread the load around punting you to another cell which if you've a directional antenna really hampers you.
s0000 wrote: » Hi there, I am hoping someone might have some advice here, I am using 4G wireless broadband from three on B525s-23a router, the signal strength where I am (Kilcoole Co.Wicklow) seems to be pretty crap recently, it was 4mbps download and about 6mbps upload...so purchased an external antenna (ATK-LOG ALP LTE MIMO 2x2 Antenna 800-3000MHz, 10m cables, SMA plug) with 10m cables and mounted it to the chimney on the apex of the roof. I hooked it up and did some speed tests, I noticed that I am getting 5Mbps download and 35Mpbs upload.. 1. Can anyone offer any ideas why their is such a difference in the download and upload? 2. Can anyone suggest a way of determining the best position/orientation for the antenna?
smuggler.ie wrote: » 1. Everyone is downloading, not that much traffic on upload. 2. Locate your ISP nearest 4G capable mast on (click on red tags), point your antenna towards it.
s0000 wrote: » thanks ED E, I suppose what your saying is the 4G is inferior to the landline alternative (in Wicklow anyway) .. The marketing would have you believe that 4G wireless broadband is better than is really is.. Any suggestions on how I might be able to increase the download speed or at least make it consistent.. I had a one or two ideas myself.. but maybe it's a pointless effort if the cell capacity is that poor. 1. Pointing 1 antenna at 1 cell and the other antenna at another ( my setup has 2 separate antenna for vertical & horizontal diversity, so i would lose the diversity). 2. Getting a combiner and another antenna and pointing it towards another cell.
ED E wrote: » You're in Wicklow. There won't be any quiet cells. You might find one is 8/40 while the next one is 4/40 but they'll all be heavily loaded. In the past switching to Vodafone would have traded speed for caps but now they've raised their caps to come play in the mud with Three.
s0000 wrote: » Just wondering if anyone has tried to Break a three wireless broadband contract based on the ridiculously poor consistency of speeds.. I was getting 20mbps speed this morning and 1mbps download now (upload has been consistently 20mbps) Kinda ridiculous that three can even get away with saying they provide 4g Internet to be honest...
s0000 wrote: » thanks ED E, I suppose what your saying is the 4G is inferior to the landline alternative (in Wicklow anyway) .. The marketing would have you believe that 4G wireless broadband is better than is really is..
ED E wrote: » Certified repeaters are now legal.
gearoid! wrote: » You can check this page for various signal repeater kits. The manufacturer claims they are legal to use in Ireland/Europe.
Timmaay wrote: » ... Part the reason I'd like to have this in the home yard is I seem to have to regularly (every week or so) have to physically turn on and off the b593, which is a pain when I have to go over to the pumphouse.
Hococop wrote: » Just looking at these signal repeaters, tempted as my signal is still not great with the antenna, my only worry is they are expensive and I would hate if it ended up not working, just wondering if anyone has bought one and are they worth it?
ED E wrote: » The repeaters take the same input as an antenna. If that antenna is failing you its very unlikely a repeater will do any better.
Ah right, thought it would improve the signal good to know, might be the position of the antenna, might have another go at adjusting it and see can I get a better signal
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Theta-Mobile-Broadband-Antenna-Aerial-Booster-4G-LTE-MIMO/392308894048?hash=item5b576ea960:g:5esAAOSwfx9c9Yjt