Mutant z wrote: » I never suggested they did I was merely saying criminal convictions can be on any side of the political divide please don't try to take what I say completely out of context to something i never said at all.
ancapailldorcha wrote: » Everyone on the left has a criminal conviction? Source please.
Mutant z wrote: » Yes he has had his issues in the past which he's left long behind him and is now a law abiding citizen those who are left wing are not without past criminal convictions either but it doesn't make anything he says less merit. The fact that the state are so desperate to censor him must mean he has a reasonable point which those who have screwed up simply can't bear to take responsibility for so must shut those up who point out their huge mistakes.
Mutant z wrote: » those who are left wing are not without past criminal convictions either
Odhinn wrote: » You stated "He certainly conducts himself in a far more classy way than the likes of leftist twats such as Owen Jones". How many convictions has Owen Jones?
Grayson wrote: » So someone says the left ignore muslims who are homophobic. I say they don't. Your counter argument is a situation involving no muslims. Which involved a weird sect, which is really a subsect of a weird sect, of black israelites and a group of teens wearing MAGA hats. Does that mean my counter to that can be about slavery in the 1800's in the US? Or how Boris Johnson lied about bendy bananas. I'm just trying to see how completely unrelated my response can be because I have no idea how yours relates to people on the left criticising homophobia.
GinAndBitter wrote: » Have you read the thread recently on the Covington controversy? I'd say 95% of the outrage was directed at a smirking teen rather than at the black Israelites condemning faggòts and saying they should be dead. And surprise surprise the big story in the media was a smirking teen in a MAGA hat and not the blatant homophobia a few metres away.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » well there was the violence, the financial and immigration frauds, the public order offences and the drugs offence. No wait, they are all tommys convictions.
Grayson wrote: » They're not silent about homophobia and sexism when it's muslims doing it. The difference is that left wingers don't only focus on muslims. You won't find a person in this thread who hasn't condemned human rights abuses which have been committed by muslims.
Mutant z wrote: » Why drag up the past .........
GinAndBitter wrote: » Have you read the thread recently on the Covington controversy? I'd say 95% of the outrage was directed at a smirking teen rather than at the black Israelites condemning faggand saying they should be dead.
Mutant z wrote: » Criticising an ideology is perfectly reasonable imo i just don't understand the double standards of many on the left who are very quick to call out homophobia and sexism when it comes to white christians but remain remarkably silent about homophobia and sexism within islam which is far worse than anything ever from the west even at it's worse why the sudden silence when it comes to human right issues within islam.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » So any word on tommies little scam going on around his australian tour? The one he sold tickets for before getting a visa. A visa he has been refused. Doesnt seem to be any sign of refunds for those who paid. Where has the money gone?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Bored now.
GinAndBitter wrote: » You stated it was grooming you didn't say the behaviour fits the description, so you've climbed down a little from your previous opinion . Do you think he is a paedo a simple yes or no answer will suffice.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » no, i have said his behaviour fits that description. If the uk police want to investigate that is up to them. I'm sure they would take a complaint from a foreign jurisdiction seriously.
ohnonotgmail wrote: So you agree it can be said with the intention of forming an emotional connection.
GinAndBitter wrote: » No you accused someone of grooming, that's not what a discussion forum is for. Why don't you contact Bedfordshire if you think a crime has been committed.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » I am giving my opinion. Is that not what a discussion forum is for? Am i not allowed have an opinion?
GinAndBitter wrote: » Oh you think so. So you "think" something and it is enough to accuse someone.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » I think so. why else did he say it?
Deleted User wrote: » I have. I have also told a girl she was attractive without the intention to form an emotional connection. Jesus wept.
GinAndBitter wrote: » But is that what happened in this case?
ohnonotgmail wrote: really? so what is the purpose of it then? You've never told a girl she was attractive with the intention of forming an emotional connection?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » really? so what is the purpose of it then? You've never told a girl she was attractive with the intention of forming an emotional connection?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://www.boards.ie/applications/dashboard/design/images/banned.png)
