marno21 wrote: » The objection by the Green Party to the building is just comical though. I was under the impression that they encouraged sustainable dense development. Sure why not spread the planned uses of the building around the N40 and get people to drive there while we're at it.
cgcsb wrote: » lol, like seriously where do you define the boundaries of Dublin City Centre?
WoolyJumper wrote: » Just making the point that it is about a 10 minute walk from Busaras to O'Connell street. Likewise its roughly a 10 minute walk (maybe a little longer) from Kent to Patrick's street. I'm aware Busaras is city centre but it wouldn't be most people's main destination when heading into the city. It's likely they would be heading at the very least to O'Connell street if not beyond that. City Centre was probably a bad choice of words when I meant somewhere more central....at the same time there is no need to be pedantic.
who_me wrote: » I've seen strange definitions of what's considered central/city-centre in Dublin - was laughed at previously for calling O'Connell St. "city centre". (Seen the same in Cork, to be fair. Anything away from Patrick St/Grand Parade/Oliver Plunkett St. is no longer city centre.) Given how our cities are growing, I think our definition of "city centre" has to too.
ScrubsfanChris wrote: » Full size: https://i.imgur.com/M0PQdCt.jpg
opus wrote: » Was out for an early morning jog today & spotted that work has kicked off at the red place that's been derelict for as long as I can remember at the bottom of Sundays Well Road. Hope they put in good flood barriers
Shedite27 wrote: » Can't decide if a tower on the Port Of Cork site would a) be a lovely landmark b) ruin the view of the river splitting
chalkitdown1 wrote: » Shedite27 wrote: » Can't decide if a tower on the Port Of Cork site would a) be a lovely landmark b) ruin the view of the river splitting Ruin the view for whom? The birds? Surely it would enhance the split since it'd be sitting right in the middle of it?
rounders wrote: » That is a very blunt one sided opinion. I'm in favour of the development but I understand the point the poster is making. From that picture you won't be able to see One Albert Quay from that angle for example. No need for the birds comment
Deleted User wrote: » rounders wrote: » That is a very blunt one sided opinion. I'm in favour of the development but I understand the point the poster is making. From that picture you won't be able to see One Albert Quay from that angle for example. No need for the birds comment From that angle? Who's looking at that angle? That's the birds reference. And One Albert Quay is such a historic vista that it needs preserving? Who need An Taisce, with comments like these
marno21 wrote: » I'd rather see the 40 storey from the Lower Glanmire Road than the roof of a building that had floors chopped off for no practical reason.
TheChizler wrote: » There are numbers between 1 and 40. While I'm delighted there's big plans for the site I'm also not sure that I'll like the final result. Maybe it will be a bit imposing on that site narrowly framed by the river. Could work out fantastic either. I'm hoping it's not just a grand development for the sake of a grand development.
mrpdap wrote: » Fully agree. It’s a prime location, something spectacular would be wonderful but not grand for the sake of grand.
SleetAndSnow wrote: » https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=156574204&postcount=146 Gotta hand it to Cork City Council, at least they are trying to get the Prism built and remove the fear of tall buildings, unlike Dublin.
Nigel Fairservice wrote: » I hope it goes ahead. I think it would be a great statement driving taking the luas into the city.
rounders wrote: » That is a very blunt one sided opinion.
rounders wrote: » I'm in favour of the development but I understand the point the poster is making. From that picture you won't be able to see One Albert Quay from that angle for example. No need for the birds comment
Deleted User wrote: » Cork will be completely forgotten about if that ever happens as you will, all of a sudden, have a massive counter-point city in Belfast. A city as big as Dublin and at the complete other end of the country to Cork.
CHealy wrote: » You are vastly overstating the size of Belfast, that city is way closer in size to Cork than it is to Dublin.
cgcsb wrote: » Belfast Cork City: 340,200 125,657 Urban: 483,418 208,669 Metro: 671,559 399,216 The metro areas are closer in population, indicating Cork's suburbanisation is worse. Belfast City has almost 3 times the population of Cork City and the Metro area is only about 1.7 times the size of Cork. That's actually Crazy considering there were walls around Belfast City Centre and it was subject to curfew at sunset only 20 something years ago. You would think the opposite would be the case. Cork needs to move more people closer to the City.
Deleted User wrote: » Indeed I was apologies, saying that it is still 3 times Cork. Still will dwarf Cork for investment by EU, government, and business